I Mostly Tell, Hardly Show

Status
Not open for further replies.

DwayneA

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
55
To me, it's just easier to "tell". That's how most of my submissions on the "Share Your Work Memorials and Autobiography" board are, all or mostly telling and hardly any showing. Maybe because it's hard for me to describe certain things in words such as what certain things sound like, what some thinks look like or remind me of, or facial expressions, voice tones, and actions.

Can someone help me?
 

shaldna

The cake is a lie. But still cake.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
7,485
Reaction score
899
Location
Belfast
Break it down sentance by sentance.

For instance, instead of saying, 'Jenny was sad.' tell us how we know that jenny was sad. Was she crying? Was she staring into space? Was she pushing her food around on her plate but not eating any of it.
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,767
Reaction score
4,662
Location
Scotland
From your question you obviously know what's missing in your writing, Dwayne. It's not that you don't know what to do, it's that you find it hard.

Well, join the club. It's not meant to be easy.
 

Fallen

Stood at the coalface
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
5,499
Reaction score
1,957
Website
www.jacklpyke.com
If it was easy, hun, everyone would be a professional writer.

A lot of it comes down to swapping abstract imagery (e.g. 'beautiful') and exchanging it for concrete language (rose, red, grass, tree, forest): to things you can easily picture in your mind. You can't picture 'beautiful' etc.

Mostly it just comes with practice. But you need to practice to get used to it. Try taking an old piece you've completed and playing with all the abstract language you havde in there.

But show and tell also plays in dialogue, so don't just concenrate on narration.
 

Linda Adams

Soldier, Storyteller
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 2, 2005
Messages
4,422
Reaction score
641
Location
Metropolitan District of Washington
Website
www.linda-adams.com
Pretty much, this is something you have to learn with practice--and it's not an uncommon problem. Things you can do to help yourself outside of simply writing:

1. Visit Share Your Work and critique for it. Some people will just see telling and point a finger like they've caught someone doing something bad. Instead, look at the instance where you found it and see if you can tell if it's appropriate or if the author is doing too much. Ask yourself why you think it's too much. Just by taking it out of the context of your own writing, you can often see things that aren't always obvious in your own.

2. Read your favorite authors and see how they wrote their stories.
 

Danthia

Try acting out your scenes. I know it sounds weird, but it'll force you to think about what is specifically is going on, not just what is happening. It puts you inside the character looking out, not looking down on them.

She was sad.

Act out "was sad." You can't do it. There is nothing that shows "was sad."

However... you can act out things that show sadness.

She cried.

You can pretend to cry.

She sighed and wiped her eyes.

You can do both these things.

Its a way of forcing yourself to look at things differently.
 

Tracy

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 9, 2006
Messages
348
Reaction score
107
Location
Ireland
I find that it helps me to realise that being a writer is actually being a visual artist. We're projecting images (and sounds and the other senses) onto the screen of the reader's mind. The reader is in total darkness - she sees only what we illuminate for her. And so ... what does she see in this scene? Describe that. What happens? Describe that so that she can see it (hear it etc) for herself.

Showing is just telling the facts Ma'am (of what happened, of who said what, of what the scene looked like).

Telling is about predigesting the information for the reader, giving it to her mashed up. It's not satisfying.

Showing is getting the reader to come to conclusions for herself: "Ah! So he's angry".
Telling is, well, telling her that he's angry :). It cuts the reader out of the creative loop, and the reader is very much a co-creator of any successful story.

As the others have said, it's not easy. But it is essential.

One trick I've done - when I write my first draft there is very little description in it, definitely not enough. And I accept that, and concentrate on plot and dialogue and all the other stuff like that. And then I devote one whole run-through on editing to putting in description. That really works for me, I find - take that idea if you find it useful.
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,767
Reaction score
4,662
Location
Scotland
Nicely explained! :)

I find that it helps me to realise that being a writer is actually being a visual artist. We're projecting images (and sounds and the other senses) onto the screen of the reader's mind. The reader is in total darkness - she sees only what we illuminate for her. And so ... what does she see in this scene? Describe that. What happens? Describe that so that she can see it (hear it etc) for herself.

Showing is just telling the facts Ma'am (of what happened, of who said what, of what the scene looked like).

Telling is about predigesting the information for the reader, giving it to her mashed up. It's not satisfying.

Showing is getting the reader to come to conclusions for herself: "Ah! So he's angry".

Telling is, well, telling her that he's angry. It cuts the reader out of the creative loop, and the reader is very much a co-creator of any successful story.

As the others have said, it's not easy. But it is essential.......
 
Last edited:

Cathy C

Ooo! Shiny new cover!
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 5, 2005
Messages
9,907
Reaction score
1,835
Location
Hiding in my writing cave
Website
www.cathyclamp.com
One trick I've done - when I write my first draft there is very little description in it, definitely not enough. And I accept that, and concentrate on plot and dialogue and all the other stuff like that. And then I devote one whole run-through on editing to putting in description. That really works for me, I find - take that idea if you find it useful.

My co-author does this! It works really well for her. I can't work that way. I see the scene in my mind FIRST and then write what I see. But this way works well for a lot of people. :)
 

Shadow_Ferret

Court Jester
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 26, 2005
Messages
23,708
Reaction score
10,661
Location
In a world of my own making
Website
shadowferret.wordpress.com
It's like the old joke, "How do you get to Carnegie Hall?"

Practice.

Telling was my biggest problem when I first started writing. You have to force yourself to describe things. Go outside. Look at a tree. Try to describe it like you were talking to a blind man. Describe the wind. Describe what you hear (not just birds singing, but HOW are they singing).

Practice. Practice. Practice.

Telling is natural to many of us, showing is unnatural. The only way to become comfortable with showing is by practice.

It's like Anton Chekhov said, "Don't tell me the moon is shining; show me the glint of light on broken glass."
 

CheyElizabeth

My horn can pierce the sky!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 16, 2009
Messages
736
Reaction score
113
My co-author does this! It works really well for her. I can't work that way. I see the scene in my mind FIRST and then write what I see. But this way works well for a lot of people. :)


That's the way I've decided to write my current WIP, and I love it. I just really want to see the entire book plotted out, conversations said, etc. Sometimes I type what he said, she said, he said, she said, then when I'm editing, I'll add the extra stuff they do while talking.

It helps a lot.
 

Lady Ice

Makes useful distinctions
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
4,776
Reaction score
417
Are you trying to insist to the reader that something is X without there being evidence for it in the text? Are you being really unsubtle? Does your writing come off as patronising?

That's how I try to figure out when I'm 'telling'. 'Telling' is when you make a statement without having any evidence to back it up:

'Billy murdered Danny'

If that was a murder trial, you'd have physical evidence, opinions...things that suggest the statement is true.

'Billy was angry'

That's not going to stand up in court.You haven't proven that Billy was angry- we have to just believe you.

If you're worried about significant facial expressions bogging it down, try indicating emotion through the dialogue they use:
'You can rot in hell, you psycho!'

He's clearly violently moved by this person. The action that follows that suggests how:

'You can rot in hell, you psycho!' Billy was sobbing.

So he's violently upset and hurt.

'You can rot in hell, you psycho!' Billy grabbed his knife and stabbed it into Danny's back.

Billy is violently angry.

The other type of 'telling' means not having enough description and so the reader cannot imagine the story. Things like just writing 'Billy was in a city' and showing none of the city, so really Billy could have been in a shed in a field for all the reader knows.
 

The Lonely One

Why is a raven like a writing desk?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 13, 2008
Messages
3,750
Reaction score
477
Location
West Spiral Arm
I feel there is a balance, but that a writer of fiction (which is concerned heavily with the imagining of scenes) should concentrate primarily on 'show' as his/her primary strength of prose.

Meaning (IMO), you can sometimes use abstract language to quicken pace through less important drama, but when it comes to the primary action your strength as a fictionist shows in how well we can imagine your scene/what impact it has on us/our senses.

I see fiction, as a whole, as taking abstract ideas and acting them out in concrete, dramatic scenes as representation of such ideas (read: 'themes'). That's why telling all the time is really just not up to par, and while the sentence-level writing might be beautiful, it won't, I feel, connect to anyone on a more sensory level.
 

cbenoi1

Banned
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
977
Location
Canada
> all or mostly telling and hardly any showing

Here's a trick someone once gave me a long time ago. Maybe it could be helpful to you. Pick a scene and underline each line that you think is important to the story. Better, underline with different colors, orange for the crucial ones, yellow for the lesser important ones. Setting different colors might help you determine priorities and how much that part needs be expanded. It's up to you.

Example:
I went to see my grand-mother before the sun went down. It was about to rain, so I brought my red cape along just in case. I sat down with her and asked her if she needed anything. She instead broke into tears and told me how she missed grand-pa. I got out of her house, devastated.

All telling. I picked up five things that could use some showing, with the red ones being those I felt were crucial to the story.

Phase 1: You expand on the story elements you have underlined, adding at least two new elements to the story that weren't previously told. There are no rules on what they are, where and how you place them. Just that they need to add to the conflict, description, or characterization. The only other rule is for every description, you add a new action or reaction, and that action/reaction goes in pairs. In other words, you either have description-reaction, description-action, reaction-action, or action-reaction, and you end up stringing those together. To simplify things further, consider dialogue as action - i.e. the character is doing something: speaking.

Let's just expand the first chunk "asked her if she needed anything" with one new story elements, and you get something like the following:

She held a portait with both arms on her chest. {description} I sensed something was wrong {reaction}[SUP](1)[/SUP].

"How are you today?" I said. "Do you need anything?" {action}

Here I have added one new story element with a description-reaction-action triplet, which is a combination of description-reaction with reaction-action. I could expand further on the portait. Maybe there is some obvious feature that stands out, like a gold frame or something. Be daring.

Here's the same text, expanded with annotations. {A}ction, {D}escription, {R}eaction.
I went to see my grand-mother before the sun went down. It was about to rain, so I brought my red cape along just in case. I sat down with her. {need to bridge the action sequence here}

She held a portait with both arms on her chest {D}. I sensed something was wrong {R}.

"How are you today?" I said. "Do you need anything?" {A}

She looked at me with watery eyes and said, "Oh I miss your grand-father so much." {A}

Spend paper tissue filled the wastebasket besides her, and the excess had spilled onto the floor. From a distance it looked like a big ice cream cone from another world. {D} My throat sored. I'm not used to seeing my grand-mother cry like that. {R} I plucked a new paper tissue from the box and gave it to her. {A}

"He died exactly five years ago, did you remember?" she said. {A}

I had completely forgotten about it. {R} I made a mental note to go to the cemetary on my way back. {A} The old man deserved that much. {R}

{Dialogue needs to be expanded. Ideas: what did she remember best about grand-pa? How the MC relates to that? Let's just put a placeholder for now}
We reminesced on grand-pa. She told me how she met him and how they fell in love at first sight. I told her about my fishing trips with him and the day we brought back that humongous trout. Good times.

We exchanged banalities for a few more minutes, and gave her the pound of butter she asked my mother. {A} I just didn't know what else to say or do. {R} The sun was about to set {D} and I wanted to walk back home during daylight and avoid any encounters with wolves. {R} With the pouring rain outside {D}, I put my red cape back on, then left her house.{A}
...

Phase 2: take notes where the text has kinks and smooth them out. Remove sentences that simply don't fit the story anymore. "I sat down with her" needs to be restated differently; the action sequence feels wonky. The dialogue needs to be expanded. There is a lot to be told about her feelings and how they relate to the MC.

Iterate until you feel the scene is complete, then pick the next scene, repeating the process over. Completion may be a difficult thing to judge. That's when betas and SYW can be useful.

But the thing is, invariably you will have added to the story where it counts and the boring part would have either stayed small or be eliminated completely. At each iteration, you swap 'telling' text with 'showing' where it actually counts. What you end up with is a draft that nails down the story.

Some people might be tempted to start editing at this point. My crappy example certainly needs much improvement. I'd usually wait until I have a chapter complete before, but that's up to you.

Hope this helps.

-cb
 
Last edited:

RJK

Sheriff Bullwinkle the Poet says:
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
3,415
Reaction score
440
Location
Lewiston, NY
Thanks DwayneA, you reminded me of a scene in my WIP that needed to be changed from tell to show. Earlier, I had Orca was upset, "You think she was abducted, don't you?"
Now I have Orca sat next to his partner staring out at the dark streets as they drove to the middle school. "You think she was abducted, don't you?"

I think it's better, do you?
 

ishtar'sgate

living in the past
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
465
Location
Canada
Website
www.linneaheinrichs.com
To me, it's just easier to "tell". That's how most of my submissions on the "Share Your Work Memorials and Autobiography" board are, all or mostly telling and hardly any showing. Maybe because it's hard for me to describe certain things in words such as what certain things sound like, what some thinks look like or remind me of, or facial expressions, voice tones, and actions.

Can someone help me?
Which is more fun to read but takes longer to think about and write?

Ted was ticked off when the umpire told him he was out. TELL
or
Ted dropped his bat, took a step forward and stuck out his chin.
"You gotta be kidding me. Hey Ump, you blind?"
The umpire crossed his arms and stood his ground.
Ted whirled to face the backcatcher.
"Well, back me up here."
The backcatcher shrugged and shook his head.
Muttering to himself, Ted marched to the dugout. SHOW

Apologies to baseball fans, I know nothing about baseball.:D

Writing the second one takes more thought and more work. Try practicing with examples like this to see how you can expand on a tell and make it a show.
 
Last edited:

DwayneA

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
55
should I try an exercise in showing and post it on the forum for everyone to see so I can see how it is? It could help me improve.
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,767
Reaction score
4,662
Location
Scotland
That's a tough one, Dwayne, but you'll be able to see how it is long before anyone else. :Hug2:

should I try an exercise in showing and post it on the forum for everyone to see so I can see how it is? It could help me improve.
 

Ketzel

Leaving on the 2:19
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,835
Reaction score
262
Thanks DwayneA, you reminded me of a scene in my WIP that needed to be changed from tell to show. Earlier, I had Orca was upset, "You think she was abducted, don't you?"
Now I have Orca sat next to his partner staring out at the dark streets as they drove to the middle school. "You think she was abducted, don't you?"

I think it's better, do you?

I'm not DwayneA but I have an opinion: It's better writing. It adds atmosphere, characterization, action and some continuity.

But! It doesn't, at least to me, convey the same thing as you were going for with "Orca was upset," because the action you are showing (sitting and staring) doesn't convey the impression of the character being upset. But see the difference, if for example, you said, "As they drove through the dark streets, Orca sat next to his partner biting his lower lip hard enough to draw blood. Just before they reached the middle school, he turned and said, "You think she was abducted, don't you?"

JMHO, of course.
 

DwayneA

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
55
I'm trying to think of something to write down for this exercise in Showing, but everytime I come up with something, it's telling.

What the heck is wrong with me? Why can't I do something so simple?
 

Stlight

ideas are floating where they will
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
2,604
Reaction score
1,069
Location
where you can put sugar sprinkles on lots of thing
Write the showing bit. Stop, look at it. Follow above suggestions, acting it out seems a good place to start. Then write it again. Repeat. Maybe you only change one word with each re-write, but you keep doing it. Another good step is get rid of the passive voice in the bit you're working. (Don't look at me that way, I adore the passive voice, but it tends to tell not show.)
 

Ketzel

Leaving on the 2:19
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,835
Reaction score
262
Passive voice is when the object of an action is used as the subject of the sentence. Clear as mud?

Example: All the cake was gobbled down..

The action in the sentence is the gobbling down, and the subject of the sentence is the cake that is being gobbled. Typically, passive sentences don't make any explicit reference to the actual actor (notice we have no idea who is gobbling).

An active re-write of the sentence would be "The hungry children gobbled down all the cake."

Too much passive voice can create ponderous text.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.