Am I the only weirdo out there that does this?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aubie

Live and let live
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
332
Reaction score
15
Location
Lovliest Village on the Plains
I'm relatively new to all of this (not to writing, just to the world of being able to talk to other writers), and I was wondering if anybody sits down and does their story telling like I do. It seems that I write the "skeleton" of the story first, meaning the beginning, climax, end, etc, then I go back and add the "meat" (backstory and such). Is this nuts? Or am I semi-normal? :0)

Thanks!
 

CaroGirl

Living the dream
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
8,368
Reaction score
2,327
Location
Bookstores
Sounds like you have an outline there and, yes, plenty of people outline (write the skeleton) before they add the meat. Pretty normal, I'd say.
 

Etola

Still looking for stars...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 10, 2006
Messages
2,867
Reaction score
429
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Hello there, and welcome! *waves*

I personally tend not to do much outlining, so I know I don't write the way you do. But it is a writing method I have seen described before, so I think you can safely assume you're not the only one :) There are many different writing methods, so don't worry about being "weird." It is all about the many and colorful ways we create method from madness! ;)
 

The Scip

...walks this way.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
1,733
Reaction score
347
Location
Here
Website
www.thescip.blogspot.com
There has been lots of outline vs. 'just write' discussion arond here. It sounds like you have a kind of semi-formal outline.
 

Phaeal

Whatever I did, I didn't do it.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
9,232
Reaction score
1,898
Location
Providence, RI
Is this nuts? Or am I semi-normal? :0)

The modus operandi may be interesting, but it's ultimately unimportant*. If the finished work is good, that's game, set, match.

Besides, why would you want to be normal? ;)



* Unless your modus operandi slows you down when you have a deadline in two weeks. But even then, it may be the only one that really works for you.
 
Last edited:

JayG

Banned
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
197
Reaction score
60
Location
Philadelphia Pa
Website
www.myspace.com
What you're saying is that you like to have the road-map before you go on the trip. Lots of people do. Some like to have the story come to them "out of the mist," so to speak, though.

Do you make a list of the various character's characteristics? Lots of writers do that (or build it as they write, to keep track of how the character will react in a given situation).

In fact, when asked, most of the successful multi-pubs said they plotted first. So you're in good company.
 

Lydia Sharp

for the love of love
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
275
Location
CLE / Wonderland
Website
www.lydiasharp.blogspot.com
I recently started using a screenwriters' beat sheet. It's like an outline, but not quite as detailed. It highlights the main plot and major turning points, and leaves you quite a bit of wiggle room. I'm in between a pantser and a plotter, as far as the writing process goes, so it's been an effective tool for me when starting new projects.
 

Cathy C

Ooo! Shiny new cover!
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 5, 2005
Messages
9,907
Reaction score
1,835
Location
Hiding in my writing cave
Website
www.cathyclamp.com
I do it in my head, but not on paper. I fill in the blanks in my mind by staring at the wall for hours and then write it all down. But yeah, it's a skeleton in my mind first.

My co-author does exactly what you do. Her first draft is, like, 50K and then fleshes out over several edits to become 100K. I can't even read it at the 50K stage. Makes me crazy because there's so much missing. :D

So, no. You're not alone!

I'm not quite sure what you mean by "pantser," but it conjures up one heck of an image of the writing 'process' o_O

A "pantser" is also called an "organic writer". It's an abbreviation of "seat of your pants." It means to sit down to write without a single clue WHAT you're going to write until the words start to flow. The creation process happens while you type (or write longhand). Some writers can do nothing else. To plot would be to kill the story.
 
Last edited:

CaroGirl

Living the dream
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
8,368
Reaction score
2,327
Location
Bookstores
I'm not quite sure what you mean by "pantser," but it conjures up one heck of an image of the writing 'process' o_O
Cathy said it! It's a thing. I know because I'm a pantser myself.
 

Aubie

Live and let live
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
332
Reaction score
15
Location
Lovliest Village on the Plains
Okay, I do that too. I didn't know there was a name for it!

You learn all kinds of neat stuff at this place. Me likes it :0)
 

Etola

Still looking for stars...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 10, 2006
Messages
2,867
Reaction score
429
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Ah, okay! That makes sense :D I am a bit of a pantser myself; I only start plotting if I get lost halfway through and need to figure out where I'm going.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
2,368
Reaction score
105
Location
The Best Place In The World...Absolute Write!!
I used to write my stories that way 4 years ago, now I just write it as each scene comes to my mind. Not sure if anyone understood me, though. Everyone has their own way to write their novel and I don't think there's an incorrect way to write a novel, so do what's easier and feels better to you. :)
 

ebennet68

Avoids editing by procrastinating
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
1,157
Reaction score
227
Location
North Carolina
I usually have a mental outline or skeleton, not on paper. Sometimes when I do that I lose the story and sometimes I don't. In the end it all turns out well. How? I don't know, it's a mystery. (Think Shakespeare in Love)
 

shaldna

The cake is a lie. But still cake.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
7,485
Reaction score
899
Location
Belfast
As the only normal person on this board I can tell you that by standards here you are on the more normal side of the line.
 

elissa

holding my breath
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
6,667
Reaction score
4,374
Location
in denial
Website
www.lissnkids.blogspot.com
I keep intending to write a skeleton and go back later and make it an actual draft, and sometimes I even outline all the scenes in the book--only to have it all change as soon as I start writing the scene. Write whatever way it works. And sometimes different things work for different stories, at least for me.
 

LynnKHollander

This space intentionally left blank
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 4, 2010
Messages
380
Reaction score
26
"I'm relatively new to all of this (not to writing, just to the world of being able to talk to other writers), and I was wondering if anybody sits down and does their story telling like I do. It seems that I write the "skeleton" of the story first, meaning the beginning, climax, end, etc, then I go back and add the "meat" (backstory and such). Is this nuts? Or am I semi-normal?" ~~Sounds reasonable to me. In fact,you're more organized than I am. I rewrite as I go, so some parts are smoother than other parts. Getting everything even may take me longer than the rough draft/final draft process because I'm doing everything at once.
 

JayG

Banned
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
197
Reaction score
60
Location
Philadelphia Pa
Website
www.myspace.com
• I'm not quite sure what you mean by "pantser," but it conjures up one heck of an image of the writing 'process'

Comes from the expression to drive by the seat of your pants.

But I like the title Misty better, because misties tend to just write, and let the story come at them “from out of the mist.” Heinlein claimed to do that—just put interesting characters with conflicting goals together, and let them take care of the story.

Actually, I suspect that those who practice that approach fall into the category of people who can hold the entire story in their heads, at once, and so can analyze each new development in terms of everything that went before, or is expected in the future. Such people can, without thought, know where to jump back to in order to add or change foreshadowing, as needed. So, they don’t hard-plot simply because they don’t have to.

One disadvantage of being a misty is that it’s easy to write yourself into a corner. The advantage is that if there’s a way out of a dilemma, your character will suggest it to you, making the twists and turns more spontaneous, and interesting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.