Before Barbie and Ken

jclarkdawe

Feeling lucky, Query?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
10,322
Reaction score
3,926
Location
New Hampshire
I am trying to repeat the mantra, "Beta readers are good. Beta readers are good. Beta readers are good." It's not working. And the worst of it is that my own stupidity is to blame. One of my beta's asked when Barbie was developed. You'd have thought I would have looked it up before using it.

I didn't.

Barbie came out in 1959, with Mattel acquiring the rights in 1964. Well, the character that would have been playing with Barbie and Ken would have been just on the short side.

Any ideas what to use as a substitute for a girl growing up in Wyoming during the 50s? Raggedy Ann and Andy? I need some sort of girlie item. This is being used in rebuttal to her being a tomboy.

Thanks for any help.

Jim Clark-Dawe
 

spike

Mostly Ignored
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 10, 2005
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
151
Location
Bath, Pennsylvania
Website
oddgoose.blogspot.com
If they were poor, she would have had homemade rag dolls, or corn husk dolls (if corn is a local crop).

If they had money, probably a Ginny type doll, or a porcelain doll.
 

alleycat

Still around
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
72,919
Reaction score
12,277
Location
Tennessee
Raggedy Ann sounds like a good option to me.

Girls of an even older time used to have China dolls. And if the setting it rural, you could have something like corn husk dolls.

Also, a further rebuttal would be the girl wearing petticoats to church on Sundays. Young girls back then used to wear several petticoats so their dress would "poof" out (sorry, I don't know the correct term for it). Or maybe a pink ribbon in her hair.

ETA: I was typing while spike was posting; I didn't mean to duplicate the reply.
 

Duncan J Macdonald

Plotting! Not Plodding!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,882
Reaction score
455
Age
69
Location
Northern Virginia
I am trying to repeat the mantra, "Beta readers are good. Beta readers are good. Beta readers are good." It's not working. And the worst of it is that my own stupidity is to blame. One of my beta's asked when Barbie was developed. You'd have thought I would have looked it up before using it.

I didn't.

Barbie came out in 1959, with Mattel acquiring the rights in 1964. Well, the character that would have been playing with Barbie and Ken would have been just on the short side.

Any ideas what to use as a substitute for a girl growing up in Wyoming during the 50s? Raggedy Ann and Andy? I need some sort of girlie item. This is being used in rebuttal to her being a tomboy.

Thanks for any help.

Jim Clark-Dawe

Try Toni

1949-1953 Toni dolls at the bottom of the page.
 

alleycat

Still around
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
72,919
Reaction score
12,277
Location
Tennessee
There's also Betsy Wetsy, which came out in 1934 (I thought she was older than Barbie, but I had to Google it).
 

Puma

Retired and loving it!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 21, 2006
Messages
7,340
Reaction score
1,540
Location
Central Ohio
Ginny Dolls, Shirley Temple Dolls, Toni Dolls (that's of the Toni permanent fame. I got a Toni doll about 1953 - 1955 so it should definitely work for you.) Puma
 

TheIT

Infuriatingly Theoretical
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
6,432
Reaction score
1,343
Location
Silicon Valley
Not sure of the era, but maybe Holly Hobbie (sp?) dolls? I had one when I was a little girl in the 70's. It was a simple rag doll with blond braids.
 

frimble3

Heckuva good sport
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
15,497
Reaction score
14,848
Location
west coast, canada
Porcelain dolls were being superceded by plastics in the '50's, so if your little girl has one, it would probably be a hand-me-down. Raggedy Ann has been around since the 1910's in various incarnations, also a likely choice. A home-made doll is more personal.
Holly Hobbie is from the '70's although made in a 'simple' style.
If you want a 'name-brand' doll, I'd go with "Ginny" or "Toni", 8" little girls with separate clothes, a more wholesome Barbie. Keep in mind that there were knock-offs and variations of all the popular dolls, so if you wanted, you could describe a no-name doll, and have her look at dolls in the toy-store window. And, in all eras, tons of 'baby' dolls, as opposed to 'little girl' dolls.
 

Keyan

ubiquitous
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
629
Reaction score
264
Baby dolls, definitely.

Saran-haired dolls. I think they came in in the early 1950s, and were a big deal because you could wash the doll's hair. (It was nylon and rooted in the plastic scalp.) Before that, they had wigs that were glued on and became pretty frowzy if the doll was played with a lot. Ebay has vintage ads for dolls like "Sweet Sue" ('Sweet Sue has Saran hair.... you can wash it, wave it, comb it, curl it! Sweet Sue She Walks') and Nanette and Tiny Tears. Oh, and bride dolls. Somewhat the same role as Princess dolls have now.

(Ebay has some useful stuff there, try searching on "saran" and "doll" and you'll see pictures.)

http://shop.ebay.com/sis.html?_kw=Revlon+Doll+Sweet+Sue+Doll+Saran+Hair+1950's+Doll+Vinyl+Doll

Barbie was originally targeted at older girls, who had "outgrown" dolls. I think maybe 12-15 or so.
 

johnnysannie

Banned
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
3,857
Reaction score
435
Location
Tir Na Og
Website
leeannsontheimermurphywriterauthor.blogspot.com
Baby dolls, Betsy McCall, and don't forget paper dolls. Before the Barbie and Ken era - even after - little girls played with paper dolls. Some were based on characters from books, some just paper dolls to dress up and play with.

I'm a late boomer, born in 1961 and I played with lots more paper dolls than I did Barbies. When I didn't have paper dolls - my mom usually got me a new "set" in either a booklet or small box each summer - I made my own by cutting out models from the Sears and Penney's catalogs.
 

Keyan

ubiquitous
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
629
Reaction score
264
Baby dolls, Betsy McCall, and don't forget paper dolls. Before the Barbie and Ken era - even after - little girls played with paper dolls. Some were based on characters from books, some just paper dolls to dress up and play with.

I'm a late boomer, born in 1961 and I played with lots more paper dolls than I did Barbies. When I didn't have paper dolls - my mom usually got me a new "set" in either a booklet or small box each summer - I made my own by cutting out models from the Sears and Penney's catalogs.

Oh yes, absolutely, paper dolls!
 

Fern

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,120
Reaction score
96
Poor Pitiful Pearl would have been around 1958 or so. I had a stuffed monkey about that time, looked like this one: http://cgi.ebay.com/Monkey-Rubber-faced-stuffed-vintage-doll-1950s-/230441230707

Sock monkies would have been popular, especially in households without a lot of money.

Like the others mentioned, paper dolls were a big thing with the kids. We couldn't wait to get our hands on the McCall's magazines to get the paper dolls out.

Teddy Bears too.
 

Fern

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
1,120
Reaction score
96
I need some sort of girlie item. This is being used in rebuttal to her being a tomboy.

Well, I missed that portion of your post - monkeys and bears probably do not fit the bill.
Ginny dolls would be more on the girlie side. Check out Madame Alexander and Horsman dolls. I think those are the two brands I remember my mom looking for in that timeline.
 

StephanieFox

Maybull the Bulldog
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
4,442
Reaction score
636
Location
MPLS
This is what I had as a little girl growing up in Iowa in the 1950s. Most dolls available were baby dolls.

http://www.dollinfo.com/pitifulpearl.htm

http://www.dollinfo.com/ibetwetsy.htm

http://www.dollinfo.com/featuredollwin01.htm

http://www.rubylane.com/shops/onceagainantiques/item/AD-00528?gbase=1
(These had skin that felt almost real.)


This might tell you more:
http://www.loti.com/fifties_toys/Dolls_of_the_50s.htm

No one I knew had porcelain dolls or corn-cob dolls, although I did read about these dolls in history books. They were already antiques. I had a Raggedy Ann doll, but that stayed on my shelf as a decoration most of the time.

I didn't play with these all that much since I had access to a real live pony on a friend's farm. I was more likely to play cowboys and cowgirls than with baby dolls. I had a lot of stuffed animals, mostly dogs, and some plastic horses.
 

StephanieFox

Maybull the Bulldog
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
4,442
Reaction score
636
Location
MPLS
Raggedy Ann sounds like a good option to me.

Girls of an even older time used to have China dolls. And if the setting it rural, you could have something like corn husk dolls.

Also, a further rebuttal would be the girl wearing petticoats to church on Sundays. Young girls back then used to wear several petticoats so their dress would "poof" out (sorry, I don't know the correct term for it). Or maybe a pink ribbon in her hair.

ETA: I was typing while spike was posting; I didn't mean to duplicate the reply.

In the 1950s, I didn't 'wear several petticoats.' I wore a dress with a poofy skirt and a poofy slip underneath. I also wore white gloves and a hat when going to an event (like church, synagogue, etc.) But, I really don't think that the cornhusk doll is gonna work. I mean, we had heard about pioneer girls having these and I think we did them as a Girl Scout project when studying American Indians and the pioneers. But I was not a pioneer girl. Really, I'm not that old.

This is the kind of thing I wore.
http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=40257142
 
Last edited:

johnnysannie

Banned
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
3,857
Reaction score
435
Location
Tir Na Og
Website
leeannsontheimermurphywriterauthor.blogspot.com
In the 1950s, I didn't 'wear several petticoats.' I wore a dress with a poofy skirt and a poofy slip underneath. I also wore white gloves and a hat when going to an event (like church, synagogue, etc.) But, I really don't think that the cornhusk doll is gonna work. I mean, we had heard about pioneer girls having these and I think we did them as a Girl Scout project when studying American Indians and the pioneers. But I was not a pioneer girl. Really, I'm not that old.

This is the kind of thing I wore.
http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?listing_id=40257142

I agree; no cornhusk dolls unless it was a novelty picked up in a souvenir shop somewhere.

We called those poufy skirts "crinolines" but it was really like a half slip with the poufy stuff.

Ditto on the white gloves/hat thing for church events or formal occasions.

It really wasn't quite the dark ages! We're Boomers, not Laura Ingalls Wilder!
 

rhymegirl

It's a New Year!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
21,640
Reaction score
6,411
Location
New England
Baby dolls, Betsy McCall, and don't forget paper dolls. Before the Barbie and Ken era - even after - little girls played with paper dolls. Some were based on characters from books, some just paper dolls to dress up and play with.

I'm a late boomer, born in 1961 and I played with lots more paper dolls than I did Barbies. When I didn't have paper dolls - my mom usually got me a new "set" in either a booklet or small box each summer - I made my own by cutting out models from the Sears and Penney's catalogs.

I agree about the paper dolls. I was born in the mid-50s. We didn't have a lot of money so couldn't afford many real dolls. I know I had a Raggedy Ann doll.
 

DeleyanLee

Writing Anarchist
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
31,667
Reaction score
11,425
Location
lost among the words
OK, I was talking to my mom, who was a girl in the 1940's.

She played a LOT with cut-out dolls of the Dionne quintuplets (they were a BIG deal then) and cut-out dolls of Shirley Temple, along with the occasional plastic Shirley Temple dolls. (Plastic is really expensive and rare until the late 40's because of the war effort.) Often, you'd get the base doll in one book and then there were "expansion wardrobes" in subsequent books that could be bought.

When I was a child in the 1960's, paper dolls were still popular. I remember playing with them and, actually, still have some of them.
 

Synonym

Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
24,038
Reaction score
4,492
Location
Kansahoma
Kewpie dolls were around, nearly everywhere. And it wouldn't be unheard of for a child to play with her mother's old dolls. I did.
 

StephanieFox

Maybull the Bulldog
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
4,442
Reaction score
636
Location
MPLS
We had that new-fangled E-lec-tricity so we had one o' them radios with pictures. I watched this:
Winky Dink And You 1953 – 1957
Get out your Winky Dink kit, because it’s time for Winky Dink And You—a show you didn’t just watch . . . you actually got to play! Winky Dink And You was the first interactive television show, allowing children the opportunity to be a part of the show by placing a clear plastic “magic window” on the television and drawing on it with crayons to save the animated stick figure Winky Dink from trouble.
 
Last edited:

Keyan

ubiquitous
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
629
Reaction score
264
OK, I was talking to my mom, who was a girl in the 1940's.

She played a LOT with cut-out dolls of the Dionne quintuplets (they were a BIG deal then) and cut-out dolls of Shirley Temple, along with the occasional plastic Shirley Temple dolls. (Plastic is really expensive and rare until the late 40's because of the war effort.) Often, you'd get the base doll in one book and then there were "expansion wardrobes" in subsequent books that could be bought.

When I was a child in the 1960's, paper dolls were still popular. I remember playing with them and, actually, still have some of them.

Yeah, my Mom had a Shirley Temple doll, too. I think that's one generation earlier than what Jim's looking for.
 

johnnysannie

Banned
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
3,857
Reaction score
435
Location
Tir Na Og
Website
leeannsontheimermurphywriterauthor.blogspot.com
Kewpie dolls were around, nearly everywhere. And it wouldn't be unheard of for a child to play with her mother's old dolls. I did.

I did, too.

And overall, most kids did not have anything approaching the number of toys that kids today have.

I had a few dolls, maybe two stuffed animals, and little things like metal play dish sets. Most of my "play dishes" were stuff my Granny washed and saved for me, like the metal cream cheese containers, old Dairy Queen plastic dishes, margarine tubs and the like, all kept in a former potato bag of string.
 

jeseymour

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Messages
1,098
Reaction score
127
Age
63
Location
seacoast New Hampshire
Website
jeseymour.com
Hey - what's wrong with being a tomboy? Okay, I'm younger than your character, but the only dolls I played with were my Johnny West and his horses. I never owned a Barbie. Not all girls are the same.
 

DeleyanLee

Writing Anarchist
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
31,667
Reaction score
11,425
Location
lost among the words
Yeah, my Mom had a Shirley Temple doll, too. I think that's one generation earlier than what Jim's looking for.

My half-sister, born in 1953 with a different mom, had one too. I was born in 1960 and got one. Shirley was universal for several decades. ;)

Could also be where we lived (the Midwest) that kept the affection for her. Don't know.