I'm struggling with what I see as a huge problem. I've got my 74,000-world novel essentially done (I keep going back to tweak things). But I'm having trouble coming up with a concise synopsis for a query.
The reason: it isn't a "here is John (or Jane) Doe and we learn to love him/her but something bad happens and he/she tries to fix it and a couple of complications arise and he/she solves the problem" type of story.
It's a book about three completely different people who share the same demanding profession, but in different cities. Because they are in a business that involves non-stop life-and-death situations, the book is structured to have each involved in a crisis and climax along the way (it's the nature of the profession). The three are not even tied together until the last chapter.
Now, I know one of the most juvenile things a writer can do is get a critique from Mom and Best Friend. But I have passed a couple of chapters on to others and the response has been unanimous so far: "please let me see more!" I'm not bragging, only telling you that there must be something here worth reading.
The problem is that the non-standard format may turn off agents/publishers (ten of whom have already taken a flyer).
I keep thinking of Tarentino's film "Pulp Fiction," and how it is non-standard, yet works very well. Why can't a similarly-plotted novel work?
Should I scrap the format and have all three characters work in the same city and interact with one another? Or is there a way of conveying the essence and heart of the story, the pathos and excitement as it is?
Thanks a bunch for any thoughts. You guys are life-savers!
The reason: it isn't a "here is John (or Jane) Doe and we learn to love him/her but something bad happens and he/she tries to fix it and a couple of complications arise and he/she solves the problem" type of story.
It's a book about three completely different people who share the same demanding profession, but in different cities. Because they are in a business that involves non-stop life-and-death situations, the book is structured to have each involved in a crisis and climax along the way (it's the nature of the profession). The three are not even tied together until the last chapter.
Now, I know one of the most juvenile things a writer can do is get a critique from Mom and Best Friend. But I have passed a couple of chapters on to others and the response has been unanimous so far: "please let me see more!" I'm not bragging, only telling you that there must be something here worth reading.
The problem is that the non-standard format may turn off agents/publishers (ten of whom have already taken a flyer).
I keep thinking of Tarentino's film "Pulp Fiction," and how it is non-standard, yet works very well. Why can't a similarly-plotted novel work?
Should I scrap the format and have all three characters work in the same city and interact with one another? Or is there a way of conveying the essence and heart of the story, the pathos and excitement as it is?
Thanks a bunch for any thoughts. You guys are life-savers!