... not weighin' in on whether the author in question is worthy of contempt. Couldn't, as I haven't read any of his stuff. Did hear something about the Da Vinci Code, though, which gave me the impression it was blasphemous, involvin' our blessed Savior in some sort of shameful encounter or the like. I ain't religious, myself, but being that I very much respect religions, I'm glad to hear people dislike Brown, I have to say.
Well, being a Christian myself - not that I'm going to expound, proselytize or preach here, but just putting it in context - I fully support Brown's right to write whatever the hell (no pun intended) he wishes.
(Or to lift the story straight from
The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail and blame the 'research' on his wife).
Let's assume for argument's sake God and Jesus are real. I believe they are, but just sayin'...they're well able to take care of anyone who offends them, themselves.
Do I believe Jesus married and had children? No. If he did, the Bible (being as it is an account of what we
need to know, not everything that Jesus did while on Earth) would mention it.
Do I think Dan Brown or anyone else can write whatever they please about Jesus? Yes.
Just as you have the right to call it blasphemous speculation, so to Brown has the right to call it entertainment.
/SP being serious off.
ETA: To be honest I don't feel right calling myself a Christian. I'd rather say 'believer'. Okay. Carry on.