Untrunking

Status
Not open for further replies.

lucidzfl

Back from the dead
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 13, 2009
Messages
2,757
Reaction score
517
So I'm up to about 20,000 words on the current incarnation of my book. Some of you know that I threw away around 40,000 words of this same book as all the events of that 40K words were events preceding the 20,000 I've written.

Technically speaking I could simply append the 20,000 words I have onto the preceding 40,000 as its simply a continuation. The reason I threw away the 40K was because I felt I had stalled and that my story really needed to start 20K words ago, not 60K. (Sorry for the math)

Heres my question. The concept of get right to the action was sort of what made me decide to trunk the original 40K. There was plenty of action ,don't get me wrong ,but at some point I decided the story was more about Mitch dealing with the loss of his wife and his descent into madness.

Now I've been going back and thinking about the original 40K. I could easily pare back the more boring scenes, and edit and slash it and reinsert it into the story.

I definitely have no problem "getting to the action" in the first 40K. The books opening chapter is the apocalypse. The 20K i've written now deals with the world as the apocalypse happened over a year ago. Its a character in the background, taken for granted.

So here is my dellima. If I start my book as I have it, with my current 20K words, my story is essentially a revenge tale as a man dips into madness over the loss of everything in his wife. Keep in mind, this 20K already STARTS with my MC being a killer, just not a nutjob killer.

If I start with the original 40K, its becomes an epic. Showing the transformation of the world itself and my MC himself. He goes from being a loving, caring husband to a survivor, to a recluse, to a man driven to find his wife who's been captured by slavers to... The 20K I've got now, which is the descent into madness.

Any of you guys have any advice? Revenge story vs Epic?

I should add that its also going to make the difference between a 75,000 word book and a 100,000 word book.
 

motormind

Banned
Flounced
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
557
Reaction score
41
Why not try both: have the revenge story, while delving into the main character's backstory through flashbacks, dialogue and inner monologue. I wouldn't worry about word count too much at this stage, since it all depends on how much want to flesh out that backstory and how much you want to use it for tension in the present tale.
 

lucidzfl

Back from the dead
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 13, 2009
Messages
2,757
Reaction score
517
Why not try both: have the revenge story, while delving into the main character's backstory through flashbacks, dialogue and inner monologue. I wouldn't worry about word count too much at this stage, since it all depends on how much want to flesh out that backstory and how much you want to use it for tension in the present tale.

Well I'm definitely not "worried" about the wordcount. I know for a fact I'll have at leats 75,000 words before editing even not counting the previous 40K.

I would really want to rip into that 40K though and pare it down if I decided to use it, so I'd say 25,000 to 30,000 when I was done.

What I'm really concerned with is the scope of the book. It really changes it from a tight, mental thriller to an epic, sweeping tale. The book would really be MUCH different if I included those preceeding words and I'm not really sure which I want to do.

Nothing will affect how I write the next 50K words though :)
 

bearilou

DenturePunk writer
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 5, 2009
Messages
6,004
Reaction score
1,233
Location
yawping barbarically over the roofs of the world
Any of you guys have any advice? Revenge story vs Epic?


Speaking strictly as a potential (!) reader?

Revenge would work so much better for me. Getting into epics and watching someone's downward slide takes time and investment I may not have. Jumping in and seeing him at his worst, gasping OMG WHAT AN ANIMAL and finding out through the story what happened to cause him to tip would, I think, engender more sympathy from me. And make a more compelling tale as I see him as he is with flashes as to what he was and finding out as I read along what exactly happened.

If that's not what you were asking, then disregard all this and just put me down as waiting to read this (regardless of epic or revenge approach) when it comes out!
 

lucidzfl

Back from the dead
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 13, 2009
Messages
2,757
Reaction score
517
Speaking strictly as a potential (!) reader?

Revenge would work so much better for me. Getting into epics and watching someone's downward slide takes time and investment I may not have. Jumping in and seeing him at his worst, gasping OMG WHAT AN ANIMAL and finding out through the story what happened to cause him to tip would, I think, engender more sympathy from me. And make a more compelling tale as I see him as he is with flashes as to what he was and finding out as I read along what exactly happened.

If that's not what you were asking, then disregard all this and just put me down as waiting to read this (regardless of epic or revenge approach) when it comes out!

No thats exactly what I was asking. I personally feel the story is more powerful when it opens the way it does now. In the first chapter of the book this guy who you don't know has just found the campsite where his wife is being held after 6 months of tracking her across the state.

When he finally gets to where she should be, she's already been executed and set on fire. He burns himself horribly trying to extinguish her body with a horse blanket and when he reaches down to remove her wedding band, her charred finger breaks off with it. Its visceral and hard hitting and I think immediately establishes sympathy for the character who you otherwise wouldn't know. Driven mad by this event he butchers the few surviving slavers with a machete.

Its a helluva punch to have in the opening chapter and I think nails the reader immediately. I think it makes you go, oh shit, what happened to this guy to make him do this? He must be sympathetic, right? I can't be rooting for a monster.

But there is a lot of really good stuff in the previous book too. It just... Ruins the suspense of the opening I list above if you see exactly HOW he got to that point.

I think both books could be very good, I'm just not sure which one I want to write.

PS. I don't know if it makes a difference or not, but his wife isn't really dead. That makes his slide into madness and psychosis all the worse, because he did it under the guise of getting revenge and when he finds out she was never killed it shatters his world. So does that fit better with the revenge story, or with the epic?
 

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
I think the real question is what do you want the book to be: a tale about a vengeful mad man or an epic tale of a tragic hero?

You can always reuse materials. When I cut 15,000 words of my novel, I was able to reuse, which made the main story stronger.

I mean, think of Dexter. The story didn't start with Dexter being a child. It stared with him being a grown man and making his next kill. Who knew how many kills he had done before, but then we slowly got to know his background and gain insight about him, and we sympathize.

Unfortunately, only you can answer the first question.
 

motormind

Banned
Flounced
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
557
Reaction score
41
I would really want to rip into that 40K though and pare it down if I decided to use it, so I'd say 25,000 to 30,000 when I was done.

What I'm really concerned with is the scope of the book. It really changes it from a tight, mental thriller to an epic, sweeping tale. The book would really be MUCH different if I included those preceeding words and I'm not really sure which I want to do.

Well, like I said: you can still use the epic bit as a background for the revenge tale and refer to it through flashbacks and the like. Then you have the best of both worlds.
 

lucidzfl

Back from the dead
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 13, 2009
Messages
2,757
Reaction score
517
Well, like I said: you can still use the epic bit as a background for the revenge tale and refer to it through flashbacks and the like. Then you have the best of both worlds.

That's what I've done so far. It is pretty interesting sprinkling tidbits of the back story in there.

Also, Maestro, you're right. I'm troubled by this.

Originally, I'd never concieved of the book as anything other than standalone.

The fact is though, as I've written it, I came up with ideas for sequels. Its an awesome world I've created and might really do well to have further adventures.

The revenge story however really should be standalone.

The epic version makes more sense for sequels.

Its really a conundrum!
 

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
So, make it a series like Dexter. Give him more reasons to kill and more storylines in that universe. But sprinkle in more and more back stories for each book? I mean, didn't Dexter's brother show up in season 2?
 

lucidzfl

Back from the dead
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 13, 2009
Messages
2,757
Reaction score
517
So, make it a series like Dexter. Give him more reasons to kill and more storylines in that universe. But sprinkle in more and more back stories for each book? I mean, didn't Dexter's brother show up in season 2?

No dexter's brother was killed in the season finale of season 1. Layla showed up in season 2.

FWIW, at the end of this book, he's got his wife back and he retires to the farm to be with the kids he just left.
 

maestrowork

Fear the Death Ray
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
43,746
Reaction score
8,654
Location
Los Angeles
Website
www.amazon.com
No dexter's brother was killed in the season finale of season 1. Layla showed up in season 2.

FWIW, at the end of this book, he's got his wife back and he retires to the farm to be with the kids he just left.

Have someone else kill the kids, and you have your sequel.

:)
 

Phaeal

Whatever I did, I didn't do it.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
9,232
Reaction score
1,898
Location
Providence, RI
I like the Dexter sprinkle in the backstory model. Though I always like epics, too. Sounds like either way could work.
 

Red-Green

KoalaKoalaKoala!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
4,392
Reaction score
3,782
Location
At the publishing party, whacking the piñata
Website
www.bryngreenwood.com
You won't know til it's all written. Or wait, maybe you will. I never know until it's all written. This is why I invariably end up with 50K words I don't need, but sometimes that's good--it gives you depth for the stuff you do keep. I never have a book come out "right" the first time. I always have to go back and reassess what I want it to be, so I guess I don't see that you need to decide right now what you want the book to be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.