I understand what each of you is saying, but consider for a moment the questions asked again and again on the message board. Some of those people are undoubtedly on the phone every day.
Consider for a moment the people who have legitimate questions and concerns.
Whether these people are "undoubtedly on the phone every day" or not, what recourse do they have when their emails to support are ignored?
I agree a 900 number is not a good practice but comparing the way most companies operate and the way PA operates is comparing apples and oranges.
Some people believe that PA is a legitimate and reputable publisher. PA and its defenders do their best to foster that impression (for instance, by claiming that P&E's negative rating of PA is outdated and urging new authors to ignore it).
Therefore, we point out the differences between reputable and legitimate publishers and PublishAmerica.
I though that is what this board is all about, looking at the differences in the way PA operates and others operate, then looking for an explanation. Trying to squeeze money out of people doesn't really add up.
Why does it not add up that PA is trying to squeeze money out of people?
Did PA have a different motive in
1. offering framed copies of royalty checks for $19.99 plus shipping and handling?
2. saying that they would consider correcting mistakes in books (specifically, smeared print) if the author purchased fifty or so copies of the book?
3. holding, what, three auctions for advertising space?
4. offering an author the option of not having (possibly inappropriate) advertising if he paid $300?
5. raising the prices of paperback books?
6. charging $4 for shipping and handling - per book?
I'm eager to read of alternative motivations for PA's actions, but then again, I've always loved speculative fiction.
PA has always been about trying to squeeze money from people.