Hi all. I'm editing my book and have cut and pasted some of the scenes (for the better of the story), but it means that some chapters are far longer than others, and some scenes now stretch several chapters whereas others will be one shortish chapter.
Do you think this may hinder me in any way? Or make the book less readable? I know there are no set 'rules' and that if it works then it works etc. But honestly, would it put you off reading a book?
Thanks in advance
Heh--this question comes up a lot. Basically, the answer is: a chapter should be as long as it needs to be and if it is then it shouldn't affect the reader negatively.
What it really comes down to is pacing. Do the longer chapters hinder the type of pacing you want for that portion of the book, or do they enhance it?
If several scenes are included in one chapter, do you have scene breaks to identify them? Readers can always stop at those if they want to.
Indeed, I see this question come up a lot too. And I agree with Isaac: your chapters should be as long as they need to be to get the job done. If that means that they're 30 pages long, write them 30 pages long. Conversely, if that means the chapter is 30 words long, write it as 30 words long. Whatever your work needs to tell the story properly is what you need to adhere to. I have never seen any rule stating that chapters need to be X-amount of words long, or they won't work.
One of my favorite books,
The Elvenbane by Andre Norton & Mercedes Lackey, has a first chapter that is more than thirty pages long. It took me a couple days to get up enough gumption to actually finish reading the chapter. But when I finished reading the book, I could see why that chapter had to be that length.
The only thing that should decide your chapter length, IMHO, is what the book itself needs, not what other people say or what some supposed convention of thought says. Story is king; tell it like it needs to be told.
Blessed Be!
