Michael Connelly Interview

gothicangel

Toughen up.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
7,907
Reaction score
692
Location
North of the Wall
From Writing Magazine (UK):

"Villians are the easiest characters to create, Michael finds: 'they don't have to be as believable as your main character. They can be over the top. You want your main character to connect with your reader and have an emphathetic connection. You want the complete opposite with your bad guy. When you're not worrying about the relationship with the reader, it's freeing in some ways. That makes it easier to draw a villain.'

That probably is why I've veered towards literary crime then . . .

Seriously though, this has irked me. I've worked hard to make my antagonist believable and sympathetic. I want him to connect with the reader, and the reader to understand and sympathise with him.

I most definitely don't like an 'over the top' villain.

Your thoughts please!
 

MarkEsq

Clever title pending.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 26, 2005
Messages
3,711
Reaction score
1,139
Age
59
Location
In the wilds of Texas. Actually, the liberal oasi
I agree. An over the top villain seems like it might be too close to a cliche, and I work hard to erase those from my work. I actually think a nuanced villain is the mot engaging and hardest villain to portray. In my own writing, the villain is not always made known until the end, so a black-eyed, snarling monster would ruin the whole story.
 

heyjude

Making my own sunshine
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
19,740
Reaction score
6,192
Location
Gulf coast of FL
I love love love Michael Connelly's books but I don't love this advice. I've seen other advice of his that I didn't love either.

For me, one of the best parts of a book is an unwilling attachment to the villain. Yes, there is a place and a time for the over-the-top villain, that's fun too, but give me a good "human" bad guy any day.
 

Melville

Reader first, writer second
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 26, 2009
Messages
233
Reaction score
25
Location
By a lake, in the woods
I haven't read the interview you mention but I have heard Michael Connelly speak a number of times. I suspect what he said was taken out of context since NONE of Connelly's villains are really over the top. They tend to be interesting, flawed and complex. Besides, Connelly doesn't spend much time with his villains (unlike, say, Sandford) as he pretty much accompanies his main character throughout the narrative whether in first person or a close third.