Where Should I Go?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lost in Europe

Registered
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Location
Sweden
I recently completed a memoir that my mother began to write five years ago, but passed away before completion. I have many questions about releasing the information that is in this manuscript.

First and foremost, the book details the daily life of living in a Chicago Outfit safe house and the quandary of surviving in a hostile environment when liberal society views you as a pariah.

I received the unfinished manuscript from our family attorney, after my mother passed away, with a note from her asking me to finish the story. I ran into a problem three years after deciding to go ahead with it. I could not take off from where she left off, I could not take off at all. I started from the beginning and told the story through my eyes. That is where the problem begins.

My mother attempted to tell the story in a naive way, but reality tells differently. My manuscript details many additions to events that took place that were never finalized in the media. I did not realize how far we were hung over the edge until I started to write this book.

Legal advice firstly. Many of the stories I told in the manuscript have been heavily investigated by the F.B.I. and local law enforcement, but the complete truth will never be fully realized until this book is complete. I can legally validate the majority of the stories, some I cannot. Most of the people that were involved in this era are either dead or in witness protection. Where do I stand documenting this information, from a legal standpoint?

My manuscript is under copyright protection in Europe, which consists of affixing the copyright symbol on your manuscript and signing it. I worked as a promotional producer for FOX back in '96 and I dealt with copyright in the past but we had an attorney that handled all copyright matters. The U.S. Copyright Office allows me to electroniclly file a copyright. Does anybody have any advice on this?

What is the editing process? Reading through many threads I can honestly say that I wish I had the writing ability that most of you posses. I can live with the fact that my writing skills are sub-par, but I would like to get my manuscript as perfect as humanly possible. If my approach plate calls for 2,350 feet at the middle marker, I hit it is at 2,350, or I have failed as a pilot. Does anybody have advice on editing services that may actually be honest?

I understand that the newbie section would probably be able to answer most of these questions but I have so many of them. Don't be mad, I spent seven years as a flight instructor. I have been asked it all. I will try and answer any question that I am asked, including; How many words are in your book.

I understand from past experience that paying a 15% commission to an agent is preferable to beating the pavement trying to sell something that in reality does not exist. Does anybody have advice on preferable agents to handle this genre?

Portions of this story have already been told from many different mediums, including the blue screen. I am the first telling it the way it really happened. Any advice would be truly appreciated.

Thanks guys. 71,387
 

Gatita

Girl reporter
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
256
Reaction score
18
Location
Back in Cali from Brrrr!
I can legally validate the majority of the stories, some I cannot. Most of the people that were involved in this era are either dead or in witness protection. Where do I stand documenting this information, from a legal standpoint?

First of all, welcome!

As an investigative reporter, I've written a fair amount about people involved in organized crime.

But I'm not quite sure what you mean by "legally validate."

If you're concerned about libel, here's the short version: As a rule, you can't defame the dead. You shouldn't accuse a living person of committing a crime who hasn't already been convicted of it -- unless you have documented proof, and even then, I'd run it by a lawyer.

If you've interviewed someone who's saying nasty things about another person who's still alive, I'd make sure you have it "on the record," as in the quote runs with the accuser's name, no anonymous sources. Again, a lawyer should check it out, especially if the person is being accused of a crime. Your language must be careful and err on the side of caution, and no doubt once you get an agent or editor, they will want it all vetted by attorneys.

Meanwhile I'd suggest you familiarize yourself with US libel law as best you can and make your manuscript as clean as you can.

Here are some basics, from my union: http://www.cwa-union.org/source/how-tos/page.jsp?itemID=29050802


I'd be very careful about "outing" people who are in witness protection if their identity isn't already public record. Not for legal reasons as much as ethical ones. Not to say don't ever do it, but do think through any possible consequences. Might someone seek retaliation on this person?


As far as copyright, in the US a work is considered copyrighted as soon as you write it. Agents don't like to see a copyright symbol on manuscripts, it will be copyrighted anyway when the final version is published, so you don't want to tangle up your manuscript with additional rights complications.


Finally, there are lots of agents who handle nonfiction crime stories. Check the resources on this board or you could start with http://www.agentquery.com and maybe search for "true crime" or memoir as your genres...

Oh, and um... be careful!
 

Lost in Europe

Registered
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Location
Sweden
Gatita, thank you so much for your response. Libel laws I understand, at least at a pauper's level. The man that I have included in my manuscript briefly came out of witness protection to work as a consultant during the filming of a movie that portrayed the situation that I speak of. He also co-authored a book about his life and how he was involved. The problem lies here; He admits to a crime that I know he did not commit. Furthermore, he takes credit for it in order to expand his fictional role. Do I defame his character if I refute his involvement in the crime that I document in my manuscript?

As far as being careful? I grew up in this mess. Thank you so much for your help, anymore would be greatly appreciated.
 

Gatita

Girl reporter
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
256
Reaction score
18
Location
Back in Cali from Brrrr!
Wow, that's an interesting twist -- so you want to prove he DIDN'T commit the crime? I don;t think you'd have to worry much about libel in that case. Could there be a question of defaming the person who DID commit it?

Sounds like a great book!
 

Lost in Europe

Registered
Joined
Jun 26, 2009
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Location
Sweden
The person that did commit the crime was murdered in 1986. The perpetrators that murdered, well...the perpetrator, were finally sentenced to life in prison for the murder of the first perpetrator in December last year. As you can see, my life is complicated!

This manuscript is not all about the fore said crime. It is about...The Everything.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.