I’m in high school( Junior year) and I’m trying to decide what I’d like to major in. (I know, it's early-sih)
I’ve come the conclusion that I want to major in Psychology. But I’ve always wanted to do art ( studio ) and Writing. ( creative)
I don’t think you can actually be taught how to do the above things.
( Can learn them though)
Anyways, I want some opinions on this and in another writer. Is it a good idea to minor or major in writing ?
Yes, absolutely, it's a good idea to major in writing. If you like writing and have a knack for it, there actually is a place for you in the world and in the job market. I guarantee you, you will be AMAZED at how many bad writers there are IN COLLEGE--lots of well-educated people are mediocre or even flat-out bad writers. When I was your age I wanted to be a writer, but I assumed I wasn't good enough. Why? Because I was reading Oscar Wilde and Shakespeare and tons of excellent modern writers and thinking, "Wow, I could never do anything this good"--and it never occurred to me, "Wait, what I'm reading is the final draft, the best, most attentively edited, most refined and wonderful possible version of what they wrote; when they started, the first draft probably sucked."
It was years before it really sank in that Wilde and Shakespeare and all the others wrote first drafts that weren't that great, and it was the long work of rewriting and rewriting and rewriting that ultimately made it great. (There's a myth that Kerouac wrote
On the Road in 21 days, but in fact he worked on it for nearly a decade; what took him 21 days was typing up the second-to-last draft after that decade of work.) It also didn't occur to me for many years that it made no sense for me, at 17, to compare my writing to things that famous geniuses wrote when they were twice or three times my age. I was comparing my first or second drafts of stories written when I had no experience to the final draft of stories written by published writers with decades of experience under their belts--so of course I came to the false conclusion that I could never measure up.
Basically, reading great works of fiction, great essays, memoirs etc., is fabulous in terms of building your awareness of how language and stories work, but it's useless for giving you a perspective on yourself as a writer. It wasn't until I started an MFA in Creative Writing and became a TA for undergraduate writing courses (creative writing and freshman comp) that I discovered, "Wow, most people really don't have any knack for writing at all!" If I compared stuff I wrote at their age to the stuff my students wrote, then all of a sudden I realized I actually was very good at it. And I'm sure lots of them were better at [insert subject here: engineering, drawing, designing buildings, math, computer programming, etc.] than me; we all have different skills. But it makes no more sense to compare stories you write at 17 or 20 to great works of fiction than it does for a 17-year-old aspiring engineer to compare her science fair project to the Golden Gate Bridge. You've got to compare apples to apples: your early drafts at age 17 to the early drafts of other 17-year-olds, and so on. It's true that occasionally someone very young will write and publish a good book, but that's extraordinarily rare; most great writers were not yet great at that age.
I mention all this--the basic fact that writing well is a skill most people don't have, and it's something that you get better at with time and practice--just so I can point out that you actually can get better at it by taking classes, and you actually can get a job with it. I got a job as a grantwriter solely because I had the MFA in Creative Writing, and another one as a copywriter. Also, writing jobs can't be outsourced to the third world the way many other jobs can (e.g. software programming, accounting, etc.)--because writing jobs require native speakers of the right kind of English [e.g. American here, British over in Britain]. I strongly recommend that you get this book:
http://www.danpink.com/wnm.html He argues quite convincingly that the way the economy is going, right-brain occupations like design, writing, psychotherapy and art are the jobs that will remain here in the US in the future, while left-brain jobs such as software engineering, accounting, etc. ship out to India.
As for taking classes, here's what I think: a person with a knack for writing or art can become extraordinarily good by taking writing or art classes. A person who doesn't have the knack--i.e. someone with average or below-average native talent--can become competent, but not extraordinarily good, by taking classes. Practice and intelligent feedback are excellent tools, and that's what classes give you. And, of course, getting a degree with a major or minor in writing or art also gives you some cred; the grantwriting job I mentioned earlier came to me because someone on this amazing NASA-funded science project decided they needed a writer to do their grant proposals, and happened to know I had an MFA. "Hey, you're a writer, right? Can you do this grant for us?" And voila.
I also completely agree with other posters that you should do what you love--life is too short to spend 40 hours a week working in a field you don't like. I just wanted to chime in with a different side of the pro-writing message.