Ok, this may seem like a silly question but if I'm adapting my comic book into a movie myself (even though the comic is just a script atm, but I plan to have it drawn up soonish) do I need to include:
Based on the comic series by blah blah
I'm not sure if i need to include it or not since they're both written by me?
Cheers
It is actually very important.
A comic book falls (or at any rate *may* fall) into the same category as a novel.
That is, the underlying literary rights remain vested with *you.*
Just as if you wrote a novel and it became the basis for a movie.
In order for that to happen, somebody has to be the "movie rights" from you. But even after they've done that, you continue to own the underlying rights to the novel. You can write your own sequels. You can continue to earn money off of its publication. It's still yours.
The same is often true in respect to a graphic novel where the creator owns or at least co-owns the underlying rights.
Frank Millar has sold the *movie* rights to 300, and was paid to right the screenplay, but he still owns the underlying rights to the graphic novel.
If he'd written an original screenplay called 300 -- that wouldn't be the case. He would have sold it, a studio would have bought it, and in buying it, would, under normal circumstances, have acquired *all* rights to it, of every kind.
It's better to retains rights than to give them up.
Of course, that means that you will actually have to do more than simply have an unsold script for a graphic novel, any more than having an unsold novel from which you've derived an unsold screenplay.
You need to actually get the thing drawn and published, in some form, if only on-line.
In fact, as a means of promoting the project, developing it first as a graphic novel (providing that the material is appropriate and it's something that you are interested in doing) has proven to be a successful strategy for a number of writers.
NMS