Am I cutting the legs out from under myself by not allowing my 14-year-old MC a love interest throughout the book?
It's not that I'm opposed to young love... she's just got a lot on her plate. She's fixated on a riddle left to her in her grandmother's will... struggling with a situation with her uncle that she doesn't understand... finally making friends throughout the book (which is the answer to the riddle in the end). And then there is another subplot that revolves around high barn drama.
I've decided that if throwing in some boy hasn't occurred to her, it's perfectly fine; it wouldn't have occurred to me either. I think it would complicate things for no good reason (I'm already doing a fair bit of rock-throwing). And horse-crazy girls take longer to notice boys anyway.
But how important is the old boy(or girl)-crazy thing to the YA readership? Will they miss the steamy kissing scenes or the fluttering heartbeats?
It's not that I'm opposed to young love... she's just got a lot on her plate. She's fixated on a riddle left to her in her grandmother's will... struggling with a situation with her uncle that she doesn't understand... finally making friends throughout the book (which is the answer to the riddle in the end). And then there is another subplot that revolves around high barn drama.
I've decided that if throwing in some boy hasn't occurred to her, it's perfectly fine; it wouldn't have occurred to me either. I think it would complicate things for no good reason (I'm already doing a fair bit of rock-throwing). And horse-crazy girls take longer to notice boys anyway.
But how important is the old boy(or girl)-crazy thing to the YA readership? Will they miss the steamy kissing scenes or the fluttering heartbeats?

