Question on How to Present a Character (300 y/o Dutch-speaking ghost) and his Motives

Status
Not open for further replies.

Corpus Thomisticum

Life Stares Back at Me
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
85
Reaction score
22
Location
New Hampshire, USA
Website
www.tomekjankowski.com
Greetings,

I have a dilemma, and though I've asked elsewhere I'd like as much feedback as possible so I'll do so here as well.

All feedback is appreciated. I am taking a stab for the first time at a full-length fiction piece, a satire of sorts, which has been immensely fun so far but I am having trouble figuring out how to best present a character, a main character in the sense that he drives the story but one who lurks in the background of the story.

Put bluntly, he's dead, a ghost, but the story is more about those who interact with him. Being a ghost, his ability to interact with the other (living) characters is obviously very restricted, and indeed that's part of the fun as the living characters interpret the few small bits of his communications that somehow get through by filtering them through their own cultural prism(s) of what a ghost is, what it could possibly want, etc., further fowling an already very challenged communication process to the extreme frustration of the ghost. To emphasize this disconnect, but also because there's a historical dimension, I've made my ghost a 17th century Dutchman who meets his demise before the English take Nieuw Amsterdam/New York. To this end I am having him only speak Dutch. (I speak several languages but not Dutch; I recruited a Dutch university student for translations.) Now, he only has a few lines in the entire story, maybe ten total in 200 pages, but in putting this together I've unpleasantly discovered a disconnect of my own which needs resolution:

I really love the use of a foreign language to emphasize the communication disconnect between the dead protagonist and the various (English-speaking) living characters who parade through his "home", but I'm not sure how best to provide the translations of what the ghost is saying to the reader. At the end of the story, a communication connection will be made when an Indonesian side character is accidentally present and stuns all present when she understands the ghost. (Indonesia was, until 1949, the Dutch East Indies, and many Indonesians today still learn Dutch or study in the Netherlands.) So there's how it all wraps up - but in the meantime, I want to somehow let the reader in on some of the fun of what the ghost is saying, but at the same time I don't want to lose that sense of disconnection, of foreign-ness between the characters. Here are my options as I see them, but please feel free to add any:

1. Just have the ghost communicate in Dutch, and provide footnotes with translations. Again, the ghost's lines are mostly throw-away lines and not so important themselves as his frustrated reactions to the living characters' obvious misinterpretation of his intent, often to the extent of complete obliviousness that a sentient being is trying to communicate with them.

2. I've thought of *not* translating the ghost's few statements at all, leaving them just hanging out here in Dutch for the reader to wonder what they could mean right along with the characters. This is very appealing to a devious side of my nature, but besides fearing I may just tick some readers off, the ghost is saying *something*, and it's definitely more enjoyable knowing what he says. His frustration drives the fun.

3. Maybe I could not translate the ghost's statements on the page, but provide a list of translations in the back of the book. This seems a bit too gimmicky, and flipping back and forth between pages is never a good way to keep up the flow of a story.

4. I could go with option number 2, but provide another release valve in mid-story to provide a glimpse into at least some of the ghost's statements. In one scene I created a (living) character who is a maintenance man, a Dutch immigrant, who during a routine inspection in the c. 1940s -- the story spans three centuries -- is confronted by the ghost. This character is very down-to-Earth and not rattled at all, but rather it is the ghost's turn to be surprised when in a cynical (and frustration-driven) attempt to scare the maintenance man, he finds this gritty working class character responding to him with a fountain of Dutch profanity. I could insert a quick sort of dialogue venting some of the earlier Dutch statements but I want to make sure it falls short of resolution; the Dutch maintenance worker is simply not interested in the situation and saunters on in his duties, again leaving the ghost frustrated but too surprised to react on the spot.

Anyway, those are my thoughts. Again, any and all input is very welcome. Thanks!
 

psykeout

should be writing instead...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 17, 2008
Messages
294
Reaction score
47
Location
Virginia
Personally, I think that option 1 is probably going to be the easiest. Even though they are throw-away lines, readers are going to be curious what the ghost is saying. If you're not going to translate it, they're going to be slightly peeved that you put it in there, but won't tell them what the ghost said.

Flipping back and forth is never a good idea and reminds me of the old Choose Your Adventure novels. While they were slightly entertaining as a child, they would lose their flair in this type of medium.

So, even though they're throwaway lines (to you), the reader is going to want to connect with the character. Especially since he's the main character.
 

RJK

Sheriff Bullwinkle the Poet says:
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
3,415
Reaction score
440
Location
Lewiston, NY
If your ghost has ben around for 300 years, wouldn't it be logical that he learned english during that period, or is the living to dead communication just as difficult?
 

Corpus Thomisticum

Life Stares Back at Me
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
85
Reaction score
22
Location
New Hampshire, USA
Website
www.tomekjankowski.com
Part of what drives the story is that the ghost is as unable to penetrate the changing reality of the living around him as they are of his world. I'm leaving him very time-bound in his 17th century world, aware that things are changing in the world of the living but never being able to get a good grip on them.
 

brad_b

Knight Errant
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
11,059
Reaction score
5,028
Location
Somewhere in my mind... it echoes in here ...
I agree with TnD, leaving the reader in the dark of what the ghost is saying will frustrate your reader at your expense. Footnotes on translation are better than putting them at the back of the book but still interrupts the reader's train of thought. Perhaps you can put the ghost's dialogue in Dutch and then add a tag that generalizes the feeling he was trying to get across.

Example: "Dutch quote", the (ghost) couldn't understand why the irate maintenance man ranted when he was only trying to tell him 'generalization'.

If the ghost's dialogue isn't overly long the use of italics might be a consideration for the translation, though italics can be a bothersome thing when overused.

I read Umberto Eco's The Name of the Rose and bought a Spanish/English and a Latin/English dictionary so I could translate some of the lines and quotes he used. I admit I probably wasn't in his target audience but knowing what the foreign phrases meant did much for my understanding of his writing. The point is it's probably a good idea to let the reader in on what the ghost is saying.
 

NeuroFizz

The grad students did it
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
9,493
Reaction score
4,283
Location
Coastal North Carolina
Do it in the way you consider the best option. Get the story done. Give it a read in its entirety to see how it works in total context, then get it out to beta readers to see how it works for others who read with a critical eye. If these lines are truely "throw-away" lines, they shouldn't have a major impact on the story except that they are a symbol of the ghost being stuck in a previous century. Once you get to the beta-reading/editing phase, it will be easy to make changes to get that part of the story in shape.

Personally, I don't like footnotes in a novel. I don't like to have to refer elsewhere in a book to get explanations or translations. I want to fly through the story without having to climb out of the minds and skin of the characters. If you can provide throw-away lines in Dutch but with contextual clues coming from the surrounding prose and dialogue, most readers will at least get the hint of what the foreign phrase entails. That would be a good way to get around this--provide those contextual cues (and clues) that allow the reader to get the sense of what is said in the other language.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.