Since I was critical of the first book, I thought in fairness, I should say that the story grew on me.
It's interesting how much an author can grow during a series. The initial story is told from Thomas Covenant's perspective, and in each subsequent book, more POV are brought into the story, balancing it out, and also diminishing Thomas Covenant's often irritating self-damnation, because there's really this desire to reach through the book and slap him into reality.
But there are also parts of the story that I think border on brilliant. Thomas Covenant's problems in the real world (referring to this world) could be a book in itself. In fact, I think that's what drew me to stay with these books- connecting to Thomas Covenant like a comic super hero- never appreciated and maligned by the people he saves. But also he takes credit for every one else's self-destruction.
At any rate, I'd say it was worth fighting through what I considered maddening elements in Book One.
It's interesting how much an author can grow during a series. The initial story is told from Thomas Covenant's perspective, and in each subsequent book, more POV are brought into the story, balancing it out, and also diminishing Thomas Covenant's often irritating self-damnation, because there's really this desire to reach through the book and slap him into reality.
But there are also parts of the story that I think border on brilliant. Thomas Covenant's problems in the real world (referring to this world) could be a book in itself. In fact, I think that's what drew me to stay with these books- connecting to Thomas Covenant like a comic super hero- never appreciated and maligned by the people he saves. But also he takes credit for every one else's self-destruction.
At any rate, I'd say it was worth fighting through what I considered maddening elements in Book One.
