I'm plotting book #2 and have a question:
In book #1 the villain tried to kill the MCs but obviously did not succeed. Now in the second book the villain is going to try again. Does this make book #2 less of a stand-alone? I'll explain what happened in book one, of course, so in that sense it will definitely be stand-alone. But I'm just wondering since the villain carries over from book #1, and also because book #2 basically picks up where 1 left off (although the ending wrapped up neatly and didn't cliff-hang).
~ madison, new at writing sequels...
In book #1 the villain tried to kill the MCs but obviously did not succeed. Now in the second book the villain is going to try again. Does this make book #2 less of a stand-alone? I'll explain what happened in book one, of course, so in that sense it will definitely be stand-alone. But I'm just wondering since the villain carries over from book #1, and also because book #2 basically picks up where 1 left off (although the ending wrapped up neatly and didn't cliff-hang).
~ madison, new at writing sequels...