I will take that under advisement.
So I guess then, the question begs, how much can we use before we have to get permission?
For instance, one of the women I know was attacked by her husband with a baseball bat while she was 9 months pregnant with their child.
He broke 26 of her bones, killed the kid - if I have a scene in the movie with that in it, do I need to get her permission? (I already have it, in writing).
I guess I just wanted to "do right" by these women, if you know what I mean, but at what point am I just screwing myself by being a walking lawsuit target?
Also, how much can I bring in from my own life, with my own ex-husband? Obviously I'm not going to use the same character name, but what if it *does* actually make it big? Could he then turn around and say "Hey wait a minute, I remember that night I threatened to kill your kid - now I want royalties?"
Or if I have a scene that is an amalgam of three or four incidents, could he then turn around and say "this scene is a mish-mash of about four different evenings where A, B, C & D happened, now gimmie the rights?"
I can certainly stop asking from now on, and is there anything I should do in the meantime to CMA?
Well, the best thing that you can do in this situation is to consult an enteratainment attorney, because his advise is going to be advise that comes from someone who is paid to know and no one around here, me included, is really in a position to give you legal advise -- because none of us are lawyers -- and it seems that that's what you're really asking for -- legal advise.
What you've gotten from your friend seems to be something close to "life rights" -- but have legitimacy within the business, life rights have to be drafted in a particular form. If they're not drafted in that specific form, they aren't useful -- because, in fact, what you are really getting when you get life rights from somebody isn't the right to use the events from a person's life but rather then right to *fictionalize* the events from that person's life. That, more than anything else, is going to be the source of most lawsuits.
We make movies all the time that dramatize events from real life and people either can't sue or sue and loose -- but if you take events from somebody's life and alter then so that that person doesn't come off looking so good -- then you can be in trouble. That's why that clause is so critical -- and from the point of view of an adaptor, so critical.
But again, you seem to have started off in a "half-on/half-off" sort of way here. If the story you're telling is simply a pastiche with various things being based on various events mixed up from a bunch of different people that you know -- well, lots of people do that.
Unless the character in your story is *actually* supposed to be, for instance, your husband -- then it isn't your husband. You're not telling his story. That you're taking events that are similar to events in your life is beside the point. They're also, obviously, similar to things that have happened to many other people.
Only you are describing the events in such a way as to render them *uniquely* identifiable -- then they might as easily apply to any number of other people. And that's how you should be describing them.
That being said, especially since you've actually gotten rights from somebody -- you should still run this all by an entertainment attorney before you actually go out with this script.
Because we are not lawyers.
NMS