The link worked fine for me, but I found the stats a little sad. One in four kids read actual books
I'm not sure that's what it means. Because teachers read to kids and assign books for kids to read. The question is, how much more do kids read on their own?
The stats make sense to me as a teacher. At first grade, kids have just learned how, they're still excited about it, and the amount of "other stuff" they have to do is still small. By middle school and high school, if they have teachers who pile on the non-reading homework and they're involved in any sort of sport or other activity, then how much time do they even have left to call their own? Then they have friends to text, email to check, video games to play, TV to watch... They have to really love reading to find the time to do it. Their lives are so full that there isn't time to do everything they'd like, and something gets left out.
If we don't want reading to be the thing that gets left out, there are things we can do.
#1 of course is write books that are so compelling and fun that they can't resist.
#2 is complain long and loud about programs like No Child Left Behind that turn school into a testing grind, and work with our children's schools to make sure that reading is encouraged and celebrated.
Let me give you an example. At my school, there's a 6th grade teacher who should have retired a long, long time ago. His idea of encouraging reading? Kids can only read books that have won the Newberry, and they have to write a 3-5 page book report about each one, due every 3 weeks. The teacher next door uses Accelerated Reader, the computer program that awards points to kids for passing quizzes on the books they choose to read. Kids set their own goals, choose their own books, and take their quizzes when they are ready.
Which teacher is fostering a lifelong love of reading, and which one is trying to stab a wooden stake through its heart?