ONOMATOPOEIA

Status
Not open for further replies.

childeroland

What happened to my LIFE?!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
2,764
Reaction score
120
Forgive me if this is the wrong thread -- searched for this word but couldn't find it on the forum -- maybe my browser's acting up. A quick question: Should one just describe the sound itself or use onomatopoeic words in conjunction with sound descriptions. What do fiction book editors prefer? Any help appreciated. Thanks. :)
 

Danger Jane

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 11, 2005
Messages
7,921
Reaction score
5,006
Location
Rome
It entirely depends on the context, the tone, the narrator, the noise...there is no preferable option.

ETA: Not all onomatopoeia is "WHAM! The book hit the table." There are more subtly onomatopoeic words that mimic the sound without feeling juvenile or comedic.
 
Last edited:

LeeFlower

Lurker Extraordinaire
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 3, 2006
Messages
502
Reaction score
92
Location
Washington's District of Columbia
Website
annalee.dreamwidth.com
I think it really depends on context and tone and the effect you're going for. Some stories call for onomatopoeia while others are far better off without it. The trick is figuring out which yours is, which I know is way easier said than done. I'm working on a YA action/adventure right now where I'm trying to sort out whether to use it or ditch it.
 

icerose

Lost in School Work
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Messages
11,549
Reaction score
1,647
Location
Middle of Nowhere, Utah
Don't annoy or confuse your readers are the words I live by. If you use it, use it very sparringly. I read a book once where every single giggle, punched stomach, and hiss, and other wordless sounds were written out. It was obnoxious. Might as well put it in caption and added pictures it was so often.
 

Riley

They won't let me be good
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
526
Reaction score
113
I think the younger the audience, the more onomatopoeia will be tolerated. I remember some middle grade novels I used to love whose dialogue would often run like this:

"ARRRRGGGGGHHH!"

"AUUUUGGGGGHHHHHHH!"

Sometimes the sounds would run for several lines. Considering older readers, however, I think they'd find the sounds to be annoying unless they were inserted frugally and in an unobtrusive manner.

CRASHBOOMBANG

as opposed to

The lamp crashed on the floor. Note that words we often use as onomatopoeia are actually just. . .for lack of a better phrase, words. We say a car crashed when it could be a car CRASHED, for example.


ETA: But now that I'm thinking of it, onomatopoeia today seems to be moving toward the realm of the absurd/humorous. So if you're going for humor, maybe you should use it? I don't know. I tend to use it sparingly and only when I'm trying to exaggerate something in a form of, say, hyperbole.
 
Last edited:

Gillhoughly

Grumpy writer and editor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
5,363
Reaction score
1,763
Location
Getting blitzed at Gillhoughly's Reef, Haleakaloha
Read the section aloud to people. If they laugh and it's not a funny scene, then rewrite.

Sometimes I've used "bang" and "boom", but they're appropriate to the mood of the scene and in italics.

I once had to edit a story--a deadly serious drama--that opened with this as the first line:

"AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!"

Someone was getting murdered, and that's what the hero heard.

I pointed out the the writer that it was:

A) unintentionally funny;

B) could be mistaken for the climax of a nookie scene;

C) if so, then still unintentionally funny.

The writer fixed it.
 

Matera the Mad

Bartender, gimme a Linux Mint
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
13,979
Reaction score
1,533
Location
Wisconsin's (sore) thumb
Website
www.firefromthesky.org
When I think of onomatopoeia, I am not thinking of (badly) spelled-out sounds but of words that have the same "flavor" as the sounds they describe. Thunder, rumble, hiss, yelp, shriek, hum -- words that are chosen as much for their sound as for their definition. Using long strings of vowels and consonants is not onomatopoeia, it is just... bleh. It is not bad to make up a word for a sound if a character is speaking or thinking about a sound -- it's the character's right to say and thing things as he or she sees fit. ;) "Creetchy-critchy" is how my MC describes the sound of small rodents gnawing on bones.
 

CaroGirl

Living the dream
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
8,368
Reaction score
2,327
Location
Bookstores
Onomatopoeia are those WORDS which sound like that which they describe. "Ahhhhh" is not onomatopoeia. "Babble" is.

IMO, using onomatopoeia is far more effective than trying to describe a sound by mashing together a bunch of letters.
 

NeuroFizz

The grad students did it
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
9,493
Reaction score
4,283
Location
Coastal North Carolina
Thank you, Caro. And to back that up, write words, not sounds. Exceptions are allowed, of course, as when there are dialogue exclamations, but as was pointed out by Gill, these should be used infrequently and in a way that doesn't evoke the wrong reaction from readers.
 

dpaterso

Also in our Discord and IRC chat channels
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
18,805
Reaction score
4,600
Location
Caledonia
Website
derekpaterson.net
This song cheers me up every time I play it:

Onomatopoeia every time I see ya
My senses tell me hubba
And I just can't disagree
I get a feeling in my heart that I can't describe
It's sort of lub, dub, lub, dub
A sound in my head that I can't describe
It's sort of zoom, zip, hiccup, drip
Ding, dong, crunch, crack, bark, meow, whinnie, quack
Onomatopoeia in proximity ya
Rearrange my brain in a strange cacophony
I get a feeling somewhere that I can't describe
It's sort of uh, uh, uh, uh
A sound in my head that I can't describe
It's sort of whack, whir, wheeze, whine
Sputter, splat, squirt, scrape
Clink, clank, clunk, clatter
Crash, bang, beep, buzz
Ring, rip, roar, retch
Twang, toot, tinkle, thud
Pop, plop, plunk, pow
Snort, snuk, sniff, smack
Screech, splash, squish, squeek
Jingle, rattle, squeel, boing
Honk, hoot, hack, belch

~Todd Rundgren - "Onomatopoeia"
http://www.musicsonglyrics.com/T/toddrundgrenlyrics/toddrundgrenonomatopoeialyrics.htm

-Derek
 

ACEnders

Self-Banned
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 27, 2007
Messages
601
Reaction score
660
Location
Too close to the city
Website
strugglingwritersblog.blogspot.com
I think the younger the audience, the more onomatopoeia will be tolerated.

I think I agree with this.

for some reason, I remember when one of my sister's learned this word in school. I don't think I'd really known it until then, and I don't hear this word often now. It just always makes me think of my little sister.:Hug2:

Sorry...off topic I know. Just had to share the memory.
 

Susan Gable

Dreamer of dreams, teller of tales
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
3,110
Reaction score
755
Location
Pennsylvania
Website
www.susangable.com
I think ONOMATOPOEIA is a cool word, all by itself, never mind what it is or does. <G>

There's some in the book I just finished because the hero is a comic book artist as well as an art therapist, and in the opening scene, one of the kids he's working with wants to know how to spell ker-pow. LOL. Reminds me of the old Batman show, with all those little sound bubbles that would popup.

SMASH CRASH BLAMMO

LOL.

ONOMATOPOEIA - a very cool word, and a cool concept. But, as pointed out, like all other techniques, one that should be used sparingly. Like a strong spice.

Susan G.
 

aonarach

Not all who wander are lost
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 29, 2008
Messages
86
Reaction score
17
Location
Lorain, OH
i agree onomatopoeia should be used sparingly, but in the same sense that i would not want to lick cardboard too often. i find they dull the scene. IMO, one of the things that's great about books is that readers' imaginations complete the construction of the authors' worlds. every reader hears/sees/feels things differently. if a writer tells me CRASHBOOMBANG the lamp fell (to steal Riley's example) then i feel like the writer has dumbed it down, like he/she doubts my imagination. and the one thing you'll hear over and over if you ask for a guideline when writing YA is "don't dumb it down." i think you can get away with the oversimplification of onomatopoeia in YA books, but (and this is just one opinion) their imaginations stretch even further than adults, so stretch them!
 

Gillhoughly

Grumpy writer and editor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
5,363
Reaction score
1,763
Location
Getting blitzed at Gillhoughly's Reef, Haleakaloha
I looked up the definition and the vocal of AHHHHHH! qualifies, since the intent was to write out a sound. Doesn't matter if it's from a throat or tires screaming on pavement.

Of course writing something like:

"This way!" he hissed, waving.

reads better than

"Sssssssss!" He waved.

(Unless it's Voldemort or one of his pals.
icon10.gif
)


I've used the device in serious stuff, usually in an action scene and only sparingly.

Reading things aloud usually fixes the problem of overuse. Reading it aloud in a scenery-chewing manner REALLY fixes the problem!

So the unlikely, but fun to say, word has been around since 1577. The mind boggles that someone holed up in a room with a Latin dictionary and said, "Hey, I need a word for this kind of thing. It might come in handy for a crossword puzzle in the future!"
 

Phaeal

Whatever I did, I didn't do it.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
9,232
Reaction score
1,898
Location
Providence, RI
And always remember and never forget, if you use "hiss" as a verb of attribution, the dialogue to which it's attached must contain at least one sibilant, that is, an "s" or possibly a "sh." Drawn out "Z"s would be better served by the verb "buzz."

Fusssy, fussssy, fusssssy, she hissed.
 

icerose

Lost in School Work
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Messages
11,549
Reaction score
1,647
Location
Middle of Nowhere, Utah
The bigger books I've seen it in that actually worked was "The Talisman" By Stephen King and someone else, sorry I have a terrible memory.
 

kct webber

Squirrel, Sekrit type, 1 ea.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 16, 2006
Messages
5,323
Reaction score
1,164
Location
In the booshes.
How NOT to use ONOMATOPOEIA: "The Magic of Recluce" by Modesitt. I'll never understand how his editor let him get away with it. Read it... IF YOU DARE! :tongue
 

IceCreamEmpress

Hapless Virago
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
6,449
Reaction score
1,321
How NOT to use ONOMATOPOEIA: "The Magic of Recluce" by Modesitt. I'll never understand how his editor let him get away with it.

Because he's Modesitt and that's how he rolls. (It doesn't work for me, either, but I'm sure his years of experience and success cow his editors.)
 

childeroland

What happened to my LIFE?!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
2,764
Reaction score
120
Thanks, guys. I read it out loud to a friend, who did indeed laugh her a$$ off, so out go the 'Aaaaaaaar's (just kidding -- that wasn't the 'word').
 

David I

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 15, 2007
Messages
851
Reaction score
186
Many of our most vivid verbs are onomatopoetic, either strongly or weakly so: shatter, crash, swerve, judder, sigh, thrash, flounder, sprawl, groan, moan.

Outright sound effects can be overdone--what can't?--but onomatopoeia is useful as long as it doesn't call too much attention to itself too often.

Sometimes somebody just "walks" across a room, and that's fine. But if they sashay, flounce, limp, stagger, or stumble across that room, then the sound of the word will reinforce that image more than the dictionary meaning of that word alone.

And if you disagree with me, I'll thwack you on the head.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.