Re: Gee...double ban...I'll get two t-shirts
Donna Brown wrote:
<blockquote>On the other hand, people who don't know "its" from "it's" may still have something to say. I think it's rather nice and democratic that they now have a forum for saying it, without paying vanity prices for the privilege. </blockquote>
There's no question that they have something to say. None at all. The point is that <em>Publish America isn't doing their job, a job they claim to do</em>. And if people simply want to have their book in print, then why pay the Publish America premium? They can have their book printed directly by Lightening Source, the same printer P.A. and most other POD houses use. Or, they can go to their local small POD printer, and have a few copies printed on exactly the same equipment.
<blockquote>These are people who will never be published by a traditional house, so nobody else is going to give their work a good edit, either.</blockquote>
That may be true, but not because the authors can't distinguish it's from its, or spell or have creative approaches to subject-verb agreement; if that were the case, neither Fitzgerald or Delany would have been published, nor would Anne Rice. That's why not just anyone can be a successful acquisition editor.
<blockquote>As an author, I figure it's my business, not my publisher's, to make sure my work is readable and grammatically correct. If it's not, no traditional publisher (be it a magazine or book publisher) is likely to bother with it.
</blockquote>
Would that that were the case; unfortunately, it isn't. People do mistake it's and its, people do commit infelicities of syntax and grammar (all of us miss the details of our own text) and play fast and loose with usage; that's why genuine, professional publishers use production editors, line editors, copy editors and proofers. Trust me, even academic authors writing usage and grammar text books need editors.
P.A. doesn't seem to do much more editing than a cursory pass in digital form; I very much doubt they print hard copy for editing, or proofing (which real editors insist on), and the "galleys" are PDF--incorrectly produced PDFs, by the way, lacking all metadata and work flow data. Their editors don't even follow the standard conventions for proofing and copyediting. They're charging a premium price for a lower grade product, and passing the expense on to their authors; that's not what real publishers do. Real publishers sell books. They sell them to libraries, and bookstores. They don't make their authors do the selling. Real publishers pay advances and royalties, for books that have been properly edited and typeset. Frankly, I don't see anything P.A. does that authors couldn't do for themselves--and yes, that includes obtaining an ISBN and being listed at Ingrams and at Amazon--and authors could do it for less money, and retain all their rights.
For authors who truly don't need an editor, who truly know that their buyers will be willing to pay a premium price, who don't expect to see their books on the shelves of bookstores, P.A. might well make sense--but that isn't the market P.A. is reaching for, nor the way they present themselves.