- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Messages
- 8,142
- Reaction score
- 2,669
- Location
- In cahoots with the other boo-birds
- Website
- www.staciakane.com
I'm not hiding anything, but it certainly looks as though you are.
TINSTAAFL:…….. There is no such thing as a free lunch
I'm sorry, could you explain what your reply has to do with my post? I told you my names and my publishing credits (well, the major ones; I also have small press credits--for which I was also paid--but you seem only interested in the Big Six so I gave you what you wanted). I told you exactly what you quoted, which is that I am not hiding anything. I'm being open and honest, entirely so.
You, on the other hand, are now claiming you signed a confidentiality agreement with one of the Big Six, before being offered a contract which you then refused, and you have implied that part of the reason you did not accept that offer was because they wanted the advance back if the book did not earn out (you do realize you've still never even confirmed for us that is not true, right?).
Having a book in your hand does not make you published if you paid for that book to be printed. You are printed. You do not have professional writing credits; quite frankly, I consider your publishing lecture cruises to be highly unethical. Nowhere on your difficult-to-navigate website do you mention that you paid to have your books published. In fact, you present yourself as a publishing/book marketing expert with real credentials, and charge innocent people a lot of money for your advice.
And if the sort of information you give on these very expensive cruises is along the lines of "Major publishers make you give the advance back if you don't sell enough copies", then you do aspiring writers a grave disservice by deliberately feeding them misinformation. You make them vulnerable to fraud and scams; you are morally, IMO, an accomplice to theft.
(Am I the only one having flashbacks to "She lives in Canada. You wouldn't know her"?)
Oh, and by the way...
I believe it has been proven what I said, “that publishers can and do attach strings to their offers. Read some of the posts.
Expecting the author to actually provide the manuscript that's been paid for is hardly a "string." When you paid Tate to print your book, surely you would have wanted your money back if they hadn't actually printed the books? Would you have considered that a "string attached" to the 4k you gave them? Or is it simply the deal; you paid them for a service, and you expect them to provide it. My publishers pay me for a product; if I fail to provide it they get their money back. Just like with every other financial transaction in the world. Calling it a "string" is hyperbolic at best.
Last edited: