• This forum is specifically for the discussion of factual science and technology. When the topic moves to speculation, then it needs to also move to the parent forum, Science Fiction and Fantasy (SF/F).

    If the topic of a discussion becomes political, even remotely so, then it immediately does no longer belong here. Failure to comply with these simple and reasonable guidelines will result in one of the following.
    1. the thread will be moved to the appropriate forum
    2. the thread will be closed to further posts.
    3. the thread will remain, but the posts that deviate from the topic will be relocated or deleted.
    Thank you for understanding.​

Space: Possible Marker of Life Spotted on Venus

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,747
Reaction score
15,174
Location
Massachusetts
https://www.eso.org/public/news/eso2015/

ESO said:
An international team of astronomers today announced the discovery of a rare molecule — phosphine — in the clouds of Venus. On Earth, this gas is only made industrially or by microbes that thrive in oxygen-free environments. Astronomers have speculated for decades that high clouds on Venus could offer a home for microbes — floating free of the scorching surface but needing to tolerate very high acidity. The detection of phosphine could point to such extra-terrestrial “aerial” life.

“When we got the first hints of phosphine in Venus’s spectrum, it was a shock!”, says team leader Jane Greaves of Cardiff University in the UK, who first spotted signs of phosphine in observations from the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT), operated by the East Asian Observatory, in Hawaiʻi. Confirming their discovery required using 45 antennas of the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile, a more sensitive telescope in which the European Southern Observatory (ESO) is a partner. Both facilities observed Venus at a wavelength of about 1 millimetre, much longer than the human eye can see — only telescopes at high altitude can detect it effectively.

The international team, which includes researchers from the UK, US and Japan, estimates that phosphine exists in Venus’s clouds at a small concentration, only about twenty molecules in every billion. Following their observations, they ran calculations to see whether these amounts could come from natural non-biological processes on the planet. Some ideas included sunlight, minerals blown upwards from the surface, volcanoes, or lightning, but none of these could make anywhere near enough of it. These non-biological sources were found to make at most one ten thousandth of the amount of phosphine that the telescopes saw.

To create the observed quantity of phosphine (which consists of hydrogen and phosphorus) on Venus, terrestrial organisms would only need to work at about 10% of their maximum productivity, according to the team. Earth bacteria are known to make phosphine: they take up phosphate from minerals or biological material, add hydrogen, and ultimately expel phosphine. Any organisms on Venus will probably be very different to their Earth cousins, but they too could be the source of phosphine in the atmosphere.

While the discovery of phosphine in Venus’s clouds came as a surprise, the researchers are confident in their detection. “To our great relief, the conditions were good at ALMA for follow-up observations while Venus was at a suitable angle to Earth. Processing the data was tricky, though, as ALMA isn’t usually looking for very subtle effects in very bright objects like Venus,” says team member Anita Richards of the UK ALMA Regional Centre and the University of Manchester. “In the end, we found that both observatories had seen the same thing — faint absorption at the right wavelength to be phosphine gas, where the molecules are backlit by the warmer clouds below,” adds Greaves, who led the study published today in Nature Astronomy.

Another team member, Clara Sousa Silva of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the US, has investigated phosphine as a “biosignature” gas of non-oxygen-using life on planets around other stars, because normal chemistry makes so little of it. She comments: “Finding phosphine on Venus was an unexpected bonus! The discovery raises many questions, such as how any organisms could survive. On Earth, some microbes can cope with up to about 5% of acid in their environment — but the clouds of Venus are almost entirely made of acid.”

...
 

Cobalt Jade

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 21, 2015
Messages
3,327
Reaction score
1,483
Location
Seattle
Exciting! And two women were the discoverers!
 

talktidy

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 14, 2014
Messages
896
Reaction score
86
Location
Fabulous Sweyn's Eye
I would be inclined to scoff at life on Venus -- isn't the surface temp something like 500 degrees Celsius? -- were it not that I remembered those black smokers at the bottom of our oceans, and other extremophiles inhabiting equally unlikely niches.

If this phosphine signal is not produced by life, then it seems it require some previously undiscovered process to produce it. Scientists are rubbing their hands with glee, regardless of what may prove to be the answer.
 

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,747
Reaction score
15,174
Location
Massachusetts
It’s certainly possible (likely?) to be due to chemistry we don’t yet understand, but if it’s biological in origin, I think the assumption is that the life is airborne, up where the pressure and temps are lower?
 

Woollybear

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 27, 2017
Messages
9,857
Reaction score
9,923
Location
USA
I believe the idea is that Venus's surface was once more hospitable to life, and that remnants of life might persist high in its atmosphere (not on the surface), where the ambient temperature, moisture, and pressure lie closer to our understanding of the physical boundaries of life.

My personal skepticism re: this report stems from a past report--the hype at a press conference eight or ten years ago, about bacteria in Mono Lake that "could use arsenic instead of phosphorous in its DNA." They rushed the press conference and ultimately had to backtrack the claim. I have not followed the research on that bacterium, if any ability to use arsenic has been independently verified.

Did a little googling on the phosphorous cycle yesterday, and it just seems like the detection of phosphine is a thin piece of evidence to conclude there may be life. On the other hand, the presence of phosphine does go into the column of 'possible evidence for life.'

Bacteria that live in air. It's a thing.
 
Last edited:

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,747
Reaction score
15,174
Location
Massachusetts
Did a little googling on the phosphorous cycle yesterday, and it just seems like the detection of phosphine is a thin piece of evidence to conclude there may be life. On the other hand, the presence of phosphine does go into the column of 'possible evidence for life.'

Yeah, it’s definitely in the “can’t rule it out, but unlikely category”. The researchers involved were, I gather, reluctant to even suggest the possibility until they exhausted other known mechanisms to explain it? Still doesn’t mean it’s life, just that if it isn’t, we need those new mechanisms.