• This forum is specifically for the discussion of factual science and technology. When the topic moves to speculation, then it needs to also move to the parent forum, Science Fiction and Fantasy (SF/F).

    If the topic of a discussion becomes political, even remotely so, then it immediately does no longer belong here. Failure to comply with these simple and reasonable guidelines will result in one of the following.
    1. the thread will be moved to the appropriate forum
    2. the thread will be closed to further posts.
    3. the thread will remain, but the posts that deviate from the topic will be relocated or deleted.
    Thank you for understanding.​

Biology: Why are plants green?

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,742
Reaction score
15,164
Location
Massachusetts
Plants ignore the most energy-rich part of sunlight because stability matters more than efficiency, according to a new model of photosynthesis.

Quanta Magazine said:
From large trees in the Amazon jungle to houseplants to seaweed in the ocean, green is the color that reigns over the plant kingdom. Why green, and not blue or magenta or gray? The simple answer is that although plants absorb almost all the photons in the red and blue regions of the light spectrum, they absorb only about 90% of the green photons. If they absorbed more, they would look black to our eyes. Plants are green because the small amount of light they reflect is that color.

But that seems unsatisfyingly wasteful because most of the energy that the sun radiates is in the green part of the spectrum. When pressed to explain further, biologists have sometimes suggested that the green light might be too powerful for plants to use without harm, but the reason why hasn’t been clear. Even after decades of molecular research on the light-harvesting machinery in plants, scientists could not establish a detailed rationale for plants’ color.

Recently, however, in the pages of Science, scientists finally provided a more complete answer. They built a model to explain why the photosynthetic machinery of plants wastes green light. What they did not expect was that their model would also explain the colors of other photosynthetic forms of life too. Their findings point to an evolutionary principle governing light-harvesting organisms that might apply throughout the universe. They also offer a lesson that — at least sometimes — evolution cares less about making biological systems efficient than about keeping them stable.

The mystery of the color of plants is one that Nathaniel Gabor, a physicist at the University of California, Riverside, stumbled into years ago while completing his doctorate. Extrapolating from his work on light absorption by carbon nanotubes, he started thinking of what the ideal solar collector would look like, one that absorbed the peak energy from the solar spectrum. “You should have this narrow device getting the most power to green light,” he said. “And then it immediately occurred to me that plants are doing the opposite: They’re spitting out green light.”

In 2016, Gabor and his colleagues modeled the best conditions for a photoelectric cell that regulates energy flow. But to learn why plants reflect green light, Gabor and a team that included Richard Cogdell, a botanist at the University of Glasgow, looked more closely at what happens during photosynthesis as a problem in network theory.

...
 

ChaseJxyz

Writes 🏳️‍⚧️🌕🐺 and 🏳️‍⚧️🌕🐺 accessories
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2020
Messages
4,524
Reaction score
6,203
Location
The Rottenest City on the Pacific Coast
Website
www.chasej.xyz
That makes a lot of sense! I know power grids/generators have to do some really crazy stuff to handle sudden spikes and dips. I always love seeing complex biological problems ending up having very simple solutions.
 

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,122
Reaction score
10,882
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
Cool article. This is something I've wondered about too--why most plants on planet earth have pigments that absorb light from the lower-energy part of our sun's emission spectrum and reflect the highest energy wavelengths. Why not have red or blue foliage and absorb green and yellow wavelengths? Or why wouldn't plants just be black and absorb all the available light energy? I figured it was because too much energy might be "bad," but I could never find an explanation anywhere to answer this question when an occasional astute student asked.

It also raises the question of what photoautotrophic organisms on planets around different kinds of stars might look like. It's been hypothesized before that "plants" on red dwarf type stars would in fact be black, because the energy level would be much lower.
 
Last edited:

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,822
Reaction score
6,576
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
I'm tweaking my sci-fi novel in the final edits and I found this a couple weeks ago:

Space.com - Colorful Worlds: Plants on Other Planets Might Not Be Green

And just as I was describing my strange world on another planet the post about green plants pops up.

I'm a specialist, infectious diseases, so I need help with the biology of plants. Help me out here. Are plants on other planets going to be green? Or is it also possible they evolved with different mechanisms for photosynthesis?

Say my planet orbits a star similar to the Sun, it sounds like then most plants would be green. But if the star the planet orbited was different. Would that make it harder for humans to colonize that planet?
 
Last edited:

The Second Moon

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 12, 2018
Messages
3,414
Reaction score
397
Website
mimistromauthor.com
I'm tweaking my sci-fi novel in the final edits and I found this a couple weeks ago:

Space.com - Colorful Worlds: Plants on Other Planets Might Not Be Green

And just as I was describing my strange world on another planet the post about green plants pops up.

I'm a specialist, infectious diseases, so I need help with the biology of plants. Help me out here. Are plants on other planets going to be green? Or is it also possible they evolved with different mechanisms for photosynthesis?

Say my planet orbits a star similar to the Sun, it sounds like then most plants would be green. But if the star the planet orbited was different. Would that make it harder for humans to colonize that planet?

I find this stuff fascinating. I wrote a story in which the characters travel to the mirror world. The sun there is a different color (red, I think) so the plants there are a very very dark green (almost black). Thanks for sharing MaeZe.
 

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,742
Reaction score
15,164
Location
Massachusetts
I'm tweaking my sci-fi novel in the final edits and I found this a couple weeks ago:

Space.com - Colorful Worlds: Plants on Other Planets Might Not Be Green

And just as I was describing my strange world on another planet the post about green plants pops up.

I'm a specialist, infectious diseases, so I need help with the biology of plants. Help me out here. Are plants on other planets going to be green? Or is it also possible they evolved with different mechanisms for photosynthesis?

Say my planet orbits a star similar to the Sun, it sounds like then most plants would be green. But if the star the planet orbited was different. Would that make it harder for humans to colonize that planet?

You could world-build a different photosynthetic biology. The “why green?” article suggests that your exo-plants would need a different way to smooth out energy spikes, but I don’t think readers really know or care? “The black trees of New Tantallon...” isn’t going to need a full back story to be plausible.

As for the star, yeah, most stars are smaller & dimmer than ours. That means their habitable zone where water is liquid will be closer to them. Years of their habitable worlds will be shorter. Many of those worlds may be tidal-locked so there’s a hot “ever-day” and a cold “ever-night” side. On such worlds, “the sun” is going to loom large overhead. And maybe since those stars are dimmer, their worlds’ plants optimize for taking all available energy, and are black? All kinds of cool things to describe!
 

ChaseJxyz

Writes 🏳️‍⚧️🌕🐺 and 🏳️‍⚧️🌕🐺 accessories
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2020
Messages
4,524
Reaction score
6,203
Location
The Rottenest City on the Pacific Coast
Website
www.chasej.xyz
Are plants on other planets going to be green? Or is it also possible they evolved with different mechanisms for photosynthesis?

Say my planet orbits a star similar to the Sun, it sounds like then most plants would be green. But if the star the planet orbited was different. Would that make it harder for humans to colonize that planet?

I assume that the life on these other planets aren't going to be related to LUCA/Earth life at all, so there's no reason they HAVE to work on the same biological processes as ours do. Now of course with convergent evolution there is PROBABLY going to be a clade of some sort of sessile organism that absorbs light if the planet gets a lot of it like ours does...but maybe it prioritized something else when doing whatever it did. Or maybe they captured some other single-cell organism to be their energy generators long, long ago. I don't think there's any hint of green life in Barlowe's Expedition, just various reds and browns. So your plants can be whatever color you want, really. I don't know how much you're hammering out the nitty-gritty biochemistry of your life but I wouldn't sweat it too much.

How do your humans want to colonize? Do they want to do something akin to Snaiad and just sort of have their little enclaves and leave the rest of the world untouched? Do they want to be like Pern and bring their own animals and adapt/engineer them to fit the new environment? Or do they want to be like the Qu in All Tomorrows and totally reshape the planet to their liking? The more different the native life is, the more difficult it would be to live a symbiotic life and not disturb things, but if they're going to do whatever they like to make the planet feel like home then it won't really matter, things like atmosphere and gravity will be bigger issues, but if you aggressively terraform then not even that matters. And I'm sure you know that the human body is just jam-packed with all sorts of critters, yeasts, microbes etc it needs to stay alive and healthy and those things will be shed into the environment of the new planet and might cause all sorts of issues. But again I don't know how much you want to get into the weeds here.