See, this is what we don't understand. You guys are lovely and yet the awful keeps on happening.
See, this is what we don't understand. You guys are lovely and yet the awful keeps on happening.
Flint? That Flint? They've seen more than share of pain, on all sides:
See, this is what we don't understand. You guys are lovely and yet the awful keeps on happening.
We don't understand it either.
There used to be Trumpers in these pages, and I wish they were still here, so they could explain the thinking behind what they like about Trump.
A short clip that I saw mentioned in reddit. Purports to be from Minneapolis, taken by homeowners standing on their porch, watching police (or national guard; not clear) marching down their street. Orders to “get inside” are ignored (legally, could be ignored — the curfew applies to public spaces, not your own property) and very quickly escalate to “Light ‘em up!” and firing of non-lethal (but still dangerous) rounds at the homeowners.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvYpSubrqrc
If this was police, it’s a further indictment of our militarization of those. This should have been a simple warning to get inside or face arrest (setting aside the legality of that order), but instead jumped to this.
These guys locked arms to protect an officer in Louisville, KY, after he was separated from his crew. #Riots2020
But see this too:
I really truly believe that the response and behavior of law enforcement is a key determinant.
Hmm, what do you think they would say? At other sites I visit, the explanations from Trumpers never cohabit with facts.
See, this is what we don't understand. You guys are lovely and yet the awful keeps on happening.
HuffPo: As protests rage across the country over the death of George Floyd at the hands of police in Minneapolis, the Justice Department is once again brushing aside its mandate to bring broader reform to troubled police departments that have lost ― or never had ― their community’s trust.
Since President Donald Trump took office, his appointees at the Justice Department have all but eliminated the federal government’s police reform work. The Civil Rights Division’s police practices group has shrunk by half, and it hasn’t opened any major pattern-or-practice investigations that could rein in police departments that regularly violate constitutional rights.
The Trump administration effectively killed a collaborative reform initiative created by DOJ’s Office of Community Oriented Policing Services that allowed cities to voluntarily implement reform, a move that left the local officials who had partnered with DOJ feeling abandoned.
Under Attorney General William Barr and former Attorney General Jeff Sessions before him, the Trump Justice Department has subscribed to a “bad apples” view of policing that dismisses systemic problems in local police departments that make unconstitutional policing routine. Sessions rolled back police reform even though he conceded he hadn’t actually read any of the DOJ police department investigations he described as “anecdotal.” Barr recently said that communities that don’t show more respect for law enforcement “might find themselves without the police protection they need.”
The problem with the 'bad apples' theory, is that people assume it's a few bad apples just festering, that need to be plucked out.
The 'bad apples spoil the whole barrel' really means that those few bad apples are spreading their badness, their infection and bacteria, to the surrounding apples. So, in the end the whole barrel needs to be disposed of, and the barrel cleaned out or disposed of.
Especially if the 'bad apples' are running the place, contacting lots of apples.