- Joined
- Oct 24, 2011
- Messages
- 23,128
- Reaction score
- 10,900
- Location
- Where faults collide
- Website
- doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
Yes, it needs to be done. The reason is because the boy, over the course of several years of imprisonment, goes through cycles of escape attempts, subsequent failures, and punishments- this conditions him and thus empty threats won't work. What's interesting is that some kids become more rebellious while others become more withdrawn, when subject to such conditions. In this case, he develops a sort of gambler's fallacy mindset- "this time, it's different!"- and so he never really learns his lesson. This is because he has hope that he only needs to escape once to have all the problems disappear, rather than expected failure. So the threat of disability or some other extreme thing would be needed because the man has to do something to avoid prison and get his daughter back.
That's an interesting phenomenon. Never to actually hurt someone, but with so many threats, it becomes reality. In the story, the boy has his parent's teachings conflict with what he confronts, which leads to a twisted morality- one of the escape attempts involves holding the man's daughter at knifepoint.
Psychological trauma can be just as damaging as physical trauma, especially (but not only) for children.