Two Republican Senators Dumped Stock after early coronavirus briefings

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,128
Reaction score
10,899
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
https://www.motherjones.com/coronav...stocks-coronavirus-legal-violation-stock-act/

In the final days before the coronavirus pandemic crashed fully onto American shores, Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC), the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, publicly tried to paint a rosy picture of our chances to fight the virus. He wrote op-eds and released statements, even going so far as to say the US was “lucky” to have a framework “that has put us in a better position than any other country to respond to a public health threat, like the coronavirus.” But, as first reported by NPR on Thursday, he was telling well-connected constituents that the United States was going to get clobbered.

But that’s not all Burr was doing.

According to reports Thursday afternoon from campaign finance watchdog Open Secrets and ProPublica, Burr and his wife also began selling stocks on February 13. A lot of stocks, in fact. According to OpenSecrets, the Burrs sold between $581,000 and $1.5 million in publicly traded stocks—and didn’t buy any new ones. And they didn’t sell just any stocks. They unloaded huge chunks of shares in companies that would soon see their stock prices crater as a result of the coronavirus chaos

https://www.thedailybeast.com/sen-k...L7JtSdOWfG_u4VsIB_2iH8IVnlXMu23vV9iqcRg8QfVok

Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-GA) reported the first sale of stock jointly owned by her and her husband on Jan. 24, the very day that her committee, the Senate Health Committee, hosted a private, all-senators briefing from administration officials, including the CDC director and Anthony Fauci, the head of the National Institutes of Health of the United States, on the coronavirus.

“Appreciate today’s briefing from the President’s top health officials on the novel coronavirus outbreak,” she tweeted about the briefing at the time.

That first transaction was a sale of stock in the company Resideo Technologies worth between $50,001 and $100,000. The company’s stock price has fallen by more than half since then, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average overall has shed approximately 10,000 points, dropping about a third of its value.

It was the first of 29 stock transactions that Loeffler and her husband made through mid-February, all but two of which were sales. One of Loeffler’s two purchases was stock worth between $100,000 and $250,000 in Citrix, a technology company that offers teleworking software and which has seen a small bump in its stock price since Loeffler bought in as a result of coronavirus-induced market turmoil.

I am trying to verify the stories from outlets with less of a slant than Mother Jones or The Daily Beast. I'm not sure why the mainstream news outlets aren't touching this. Even Fox did a piece on Burr. Such conduct is illegal as well as immoral, isn't it. Or is there no version of "insider trading" laws that apply to elected officials?

Assuming this is true, it's utterly disgusting.
 

cornflake

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
16,171
Reaction score
3,734
Drain that swamp.
 

frimble3

Heckuva good sport
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
11,670
Reaction score
6,571
Location
west coast, canada
This is clearly real, which is why I am surprised outlets like NPR, the NYT, and the WaPost haven't touched it yet. Maybe they are digging deeper?
They have got a much longer list of politicians doing this, and are going diligently through it?
 

mccardey

Self-Ban
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
19,332
Reaction score
16,083
Location
Australia.
Tacky Tacky Tacky. Srsly.

Very tacky.
 

Prozyan

Are you one, Herbert?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
2,326
Reaction score
658
Location
Nuevo Mexico
You can add Feinstein and Inhofe to the list. That said, its doubtful any of the people are personally managing their own portfolios.
 

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,765
Reaction score
15,221
Location
Massachusetts
You can add Feinstein and Inhofe to the list. That said, its doubtful any of the people are personally managing their own portfolios.

But those fund managers would have to have been informed by Senators or staff getting these same briefings, right?
 

regdog

The Scavengers
Staff member
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
58,075
Reaction score
21,013
Location
She/Her
Arrest eveyone one of them, charge them with insider trading and jail them.
ETA: And fine them every single penny of profit they got.
 
Last edited:

CarpeScriptum

Born to be Mild
Kind Benefactor
Registered
Joined
Mar 9, 2020
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Location
East Coast
You can add Feinstein and Inhofe to the list. That said, its doubtful any of the people are personally managing their own portfolios.

Almost undoubtedly not. Loeffler specifically said she and her husband did not.

It's also worth looking at the timeline. On Feb 6 NPR tweeted that there were 28,000 cases in China. Burr sold his stock a week later. What additional information would one need beyond a 28,000 case epidemic to realize that maybe something was about to go seriously wrong?
 

ElaineA

All about that action, boss.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
8,582
Reaction score
8,525
Location
The Seattle suburbs
Website
www.reneedominick.com
Almost undoubtedly not. Loeffler specifically said she and her husband did not.
While I agree they likely do not, her husband IS the head of the NYSE, and she WAS placed on the committee overseeing the NYSE. That alone means their holdings should have gone into a blind trust. <--ETA, see post below. She says their trades are blind.

It's also worth looking at the timeline. On Feb 6 NPR tweeted that there were 28,000 cases in China. Burr sold his stock a week later. What additional information would one need beyond a 28,000 case epidemic to realize that maybe something was about to go seriously wrong?
Yes, what additional? Hmm....and yet, somehow, it didn't happen that way. Our brokerage didn't act to save our IRA/Roth retirement fund, now sitting at a 25% loss (even with us heavily in bonds because of our ages). So either Loeffler's brokers are particularly brilliant/insightful/lucky, or were privy to information the general trading public didn't have, and they acted on it. Which seems more likely?

By the way, these aren't mutual funds being sold (and bought) by these Senators. They're individual stocks. David Perdue of GA dumped millions of Caesar's stock on Feb 28 and picked up Pfizer and DuPont.

The sickening thing is Barr won't let DOJ invistigate, and this will all be swept under the rug. Meanwhile people like my husband and I, people without taxpayer-paid pensions and Gold Standard healthcare-for-life, are left with our life's savings seriously depleted, just when we need to start using it.
 
Last edited:

Prozyan

Are you one, Herbert?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
2,326
Reaction score
658
Location
Nuevo Mexico
I don't care if its red or blue. They all should have their portfolios placed into a blind trust when they take the oath of office.
 

ElaineA

All about that action, boss.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
8,582
Reaction score
8,525
Location
The Seattle suburbs
Website
www.reneedominick.com
DiFi's husband sold $500K of a biotech stock. Not sure about the activity in general around his trading, but dumping biotech *appears* different from dumping Caesar's. Still, if there's no there there, an investigation should be welcome.

Loeffler is claiming her trades are blind, so same goes for them. Invite the investigation, open the books, be transparent.
 

cbenoi1

Banned
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
977
Location
Canada
Arrest eveyone one of them, charge them with insider trading and jail them.
ETA: And fine them every single penny of profit they got.

Given the state of the GOP, that would be akin to handing out speeding tickets at a NASCAR race.

-cb
 

regdog

The Scavengers
Staff member
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
58,075
Reaction score
21,013
Location
She/Her
Almost undoubtedly not. Loeffler specifically said she and her husband did not.

It's also worth looking at the timeline. On Feb 6 NPR tweeted that there were 28,000 cases in China. Burr sold his stock a week later. What additional information would one need beyond a 28,000 case epidemic to realize that maybe something was about to go seriously wrong?

Her broker must have extrodanary psychic abilitites because before the mandated work from home and school from home, they bought stock in companies that specialze in telecommuting and telecommuting software.
 

Kjbartolotta

Potentially has/is dog
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
4,197
Reaction score
1,049
Location
Los Angeles
I don't care if its red or blue. They all should have their portfolios placed into a blind trust when they take the oath of office.

Not disagreeing on this point, but DiFi's husband sold his cancer research stocks at a low back in January, so it's pretty clearly a different thing. And it will get amplified and spun as a distraction from the more clear-cut and obvious larceny, and there's not much there there. Also, Feinstein was not at the Republicans-only hearing in Feb. that lead to the sell-off.
 
Last edited:

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,128
Reaction score
10,899
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
Not disagreeing on this point, but DiFi's husband sold his cancer research stocks at a low back in January, so it's pretty clearly a different thing. And it will get amplified and spun as a distraction from the more clear-cut and obvious larceny, and there's not much there there. Also, Feinstein was not at the Republicans-only hearing in Feb. that lead to the sell-off.

This is an important distinction.

However, if it turns out she had inside information that changed her and her spouse's buying and selling behavior, she should pay the price for that.

And every elected official who has access to information (that could affect the stock market) before it becomes known to the general public should have their holdings in a bling trust, and when it appears that their brokers/agents are privy to information they should not have, that needs to be investigated. And those brokers should be nailed to the wall too, if it turns out they are treating the investments of their wealthy or powerful clients differently than they are handling "the masses'" retirement accounts.

The really loathsome thing Burr did, imo, was issue different statements privately and publicly.

On Feb. 27, when the United States had 15 confirmed cases of COVID-19, President Trump was tamping down fears and suggesting that the virus could be seasonal.

"It's going to disappear. One day, it's like a miracle. It will disappear," the president said then, before adding, "it could get worse before it gets better. It could maybe go away. We'll see what happens."

On that same day, Burr attended a luncheon held at a social club called the Capitol Hill Club. And he delivered a much more alarming message.

"There's one thing that I can tell you about this: It is much more aggressive in its transmission than anything that we have seen in recent history," he said, according to a secret recording of the remarks obtained by NPR. "It is probably more akin to the 1918 pandemic."

The luncheon had been organized by the Tar Heel Circle, a nonpartisan group whose membership consists of businesses and organizations in North Carolina, the state Burr represents. Membership to join the Tar Heel Circle costs between $500 and $10,000 and promises that members "enjoy interaction with top leaders and staff from Congress, the administration, and the private sector," according to the group's website.

His warnings were highly specific and dire, but his public comments were much optimistic.

But in his public comments about the threat of COVID-19, Burr never offered the kind of precise warning that he delivered to the small group of his constituents.

On Feb. 7, Burr co-authored an op-ed that laid out the tools that the U.S. government had at its disposal to fight the coronavirus.

"Luckily, we have a framework in place that has put us in a better position than any other country to respond to a public health threat, like the coronavirus," Burr said in a statement on March 5.

He pressed a CDC official in early March as to why the nation's pandemic surveillance capabilities had fallen short despite the millions in funding he had helped secure for that purpose through PAHPA.

But despite his longtime interest in biohazard threats, his expertise on the subject, and his role as chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Burr did not warn the public of the government actions he thought might become necessary, as he did at the luncheon on Feb. 27.

In attendance, according to a copy of the RSVP list obtained by NPR, were dozens of invited guests representing companies and organizations from North Carolina. And according to federal records, those companies or their political committees donated more than $100,000 to Burr's election campaign in 2015 and 2016.

https://www.npr.org/2020/03/19/8181...-questions-about-private-comments-on-covid-19

Seems like that swamp someone promised to drain is now up to all our necks...
 
Last edited:

darkprincealain

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
3,395
Reaction score
1,978
Location
Nowhere. Now here.
I still think Feinstein’s decision maker(s) for that blind trust need to be looked at for insider trading violations. Profoundly carefully.
 

CarpeScriptum

Born to be Mild
Kind Benefactor
Registered
Joined
Mar 9, 2020
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Location
East Coast
Yes, what additional? Hmm....and yet, somehow, it didn't happen that way. Our brokerage didn't act to save our IRA/Roth retirement fund, now sitting at a 25% loss (even with us heavily in bonds because of our ages).

Loeffler et al are using money managers who actively trade their accounts. Obviously I don't know if your brokerage provides that service to you for your retirement accounts. I'm pretty sure some do, but I don't know how active they are compared to the sort of entity the president of the NYSE is likely to employ to run his blind trust. I would think most brokerages are providing rebalancing services at most, rather than active trading.

So either Loeffler's brokers are particularly brilliant/insightful/lucky, or were privy to information the general trading public didn't have, and they acted on it. Which seems more likely?

I'd say those folks are probably quite good at what they do.

It's a painful financial time, for sure, and the uncertainty of how long this will go on makes it even more so.
 

darkprincealain

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
3,395
Reaction score
1,978
Location
Nowhere. Now here.
Why her specifically? What stands out to you?

I didn’t say her. I said her decision maker(s). Plenty of the time these blind trusts are fine, but I just wonder how blind it is. As well, the republican senators and whoever else decided to dump stock after this briefing or rumor started. I’m not suggesting Feinstein herself did anything wrong. I’m sorry if it looks like I said she did.
 

cbenoi1

Banned
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
977
Location
Canada
Selling stocks in consumer goods companies in this economic environment is not a crime. The writing was on the wall the markets were going to take a dip and consumers would become more conservative and drop luxury goods and services.

What IS suspicious here is when people buy stock that they know - by some miracle that smells like insider trading - is going on the rise.

Like this move:

SENATORS' STOCK SALES UNDER FIRE AFTER CORONAVIRUS TANKED MARKETS
https://www.wktv.com/content/news/568976922.html

Loeffler and her husband sold 27 stocks between January 24 and February 14 at a value of $1.28 million and $3.1 million, according to Senate financial disclosure records. They also purchased three stocks for between $450,000 to $1 million, including shares in Citrix, a software company used for teleconferencing that's one of the few that's gained value amid the coronavirus outbreak. Citrix's stock was $122.03 on February 14, the day it was purchased, and closed at $125.31 on Thursday.


-cb
 

CarpeScriptum

Born to be Mild
Kind Benefactor
Registered
Joined
Mar 9, 2020
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Location
East Coast
It's worth looking at what was said, when it was said, and what the subject was of each statement.

Google tells me that Burr's "co-authored" article (written with Lamar Alexander, a fact rarely mentioned in any of the coverage) can be found here:

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/cor...ing-to-protect-you-sen-alexander-and-sen-burr

It is entitled "Coronavirus prevention steps the U.S. government is taking to protect you". And that's what the article is about. Its subject is not "How bad is the virus and what can we expect?" That article was published on February 7, and discusses what the government was doing.

Three weeks later, at the social club luncheon on February 27, Burr was more concerned, and expressed greater concern.

Well weren't we all more concerned by then? On February 7 there were 317 COVID-19 cases outside China. By February 27 there were 4,300 and rising. It would have been strange if louder alarm bells hadn't been sounded at that point.

When three weeks go by between statements in a situation worsening as rapidly as this one, it's to be expected that those statements will differ in character, with the second expressing more concern.
 
Last edited: