JK Rowling in row over court ruling on transgender issues
I suppose it doesn't matter. JKR has by any measure lost a lot of cultural cachet in the 2010s, with only a set of increasingly dire adult Harry Potter spinoffs and tweets to her name in recent years. I suppose it doesn't matter that for so many people she was the writer for kids for fifteen years. For marginalised kids, for kids who struggled to read, for kids who needed escapism for whatever reason. She had a huge LGBT+ fanbase. Others will take her place. The royalties will dwindle. The tweets might not, but.
Sad, expected. It's previously been kind of general knowledge, I think, that JKR doesn't exactly have progressive ideas about transgender people. But this is the first time, (again, I think), she's blasted out a tweet with so many TERF shibboleths. Conflating being transgender with cross-dressing, biological essentialism, framing inclusivity of gender diverse people as being somehow anti-female. She's not dumb. She knows that this case was about someone who was anti-trans enough to make her workplace an uncomfortable place for others, and got fired for it. She knows it wasn't just about "stating sex is real", whatever the hell that means. JK Rowling is anti-trans. She's a bigot.Having not tweeted since November, JK Rowling broke her Twitter silence to speak out in support of a researcher who lost an employment tribunal case for using “offensive and exclusionary” language on Twitter.
Rowling tweeted about Maya Forstater, who lost her job at an international thinktank after a series of tweets, including one in which she said: “Men cannot change into women.”
Rowling, who has 14.6 million followers, said in the tweet: “Dress however you please (…) But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real?” She referenced the case using the hashtag #IStandWithMaya.
I suppose it doesn't matter. JKR has by any measure lost a lot of cultural cachet in the 2010s, with only a set of increasingly dire adult Harry Potter spinoffs and tweets to her name in recent years. I suppose it doesn't matter that for so many people she was the writer for kids for fifteen years. For marginalised kids, for kids who struggled to read, for kids who needed escapism for whatever reason. She had a huge LGBT+ fanbase. Others will take her place. The royalties will dwindle. The tweets might not, but.
Last edited: