I am looking for help about what could be going on here. I'm seven months and 200+ queries in. I've queried everything from large agencies to boutiques. I have been using alternate query letters (A vs. B testing). I have gotten three reads. All of those said no, because they "can't get into the voice" in my manuscript. To me, that means "poorly written." No further critique than that.
However, my manuscript has been beta read by (mostly non-friend) Southern readers, each of whom was asked a specific set of questions about voice, plot, characters and believability. All have been very enthused. It has been read by a successful Southern novelist who has had 10 books published (one made into a movie) but is no longer active. The novelist, also enthusiastic, offered a valuable critique and the manuscript is better for that. The first chapters have been critiqued online by other authors. A sample: "Honestly, this is a great piece, and there's not too much to criticize."
It's an adult crime mystery written primarily for men in present tense and is set in the modern South, where I have lived for 37 years. The characters are authentically drawn from people I've met in my career as a journalist and also from friends. I'm a journeyman reporter and editor who has been writing for 45 years and is currently employed as a writer/editor at a Southern university.
There is an extreme disconnect between the little bit of agent feedback I have received and what my beta readers say and I don't quite know what to do about it. I'm also concerned that that a 200 to 3 ratio may indicate a query letter problem. I have been querying mostly in traditional form: Plot hook, my background, manuscript offer, sample if the guidelines ask for one. My queries have been reviewed by a successful traditionally published author, as well.
I've been a sales director and commissioned salesperson before, so I feel I have some insights into the agent's side of things.
I don't want to self-publish but that is where this appears to be going unless I can figure out the disconnect. So please, any and all help will be appreciated. Thank you.
However, my manuscript has been beta read by (mostly non-friend) Southern readers, each of whom was asked a specific set of questions about voice, plot, characters and believability. All have been very enthused. It has been read by a successful Southern novelist who has had 10 books published (one made into a movie) but is no longer active. The novelist, also enthusiastic, offered a valuable critique and the manuscript is better for that. The first chapters have been critiqued online by other authors. A sample: "Honestly, this is a great piece, and there's not too much to criticize."
It's an adult crime mystery written primarily for men in present tense and is set in the modern South, where I have lived for 37 years. The characters are authentically drawn from people I've met in my career as a journalist and also from friends. I'm a journeyman reporter and editor who has been writing for 45 years and is currently employed as a writer/editor at a Southern university.
There is an extreme disconnect between the little bit of agent feedback I have received and what my beta readers say and I don't quite know what to do about it. I'm also concerned that that a 200 to 3 ratio may indicate a query letter problem. I have been querying mostly in traditional form: Plot hook, my background, manuscript offer, sample if the guidelines ask for one. My queries have been reviewed by a successful traditionally published author, as well.
I've been a sales director and commissioned salesperson before, so I feel I have some insights into the agent's side of things.
I don't want to self-publish but that is where this appears to be going unless I can figure out the disconnect. So please, any and all help will be appreciated. Thank you.
Last edited: