• This forum is specifically for the discussion of factual science and technology. When the topic moves to speculation, then it needs to also move to the parent forum, Science Fiction and Fantasy (SF/F).

    If the topic of a discussion becomes political, even remotely so, then it immediately does no longer belong here. Failure to comply with these simple and reasonable guidelines will result in one of the following.
    1. the thread will be moved to the appropriate forum
    2. the thread will be closed to further posts.
    3. the thread will remain, but the posts that deviate from the topic will be relocated or deleted.
    Thank you for understanding.​

How scientists detected water on a potentially habitable exoplanet for the first time

Jason

Ideas bounce around in my head
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 26, 2016
Messages
6,011
Reaction score
1,036
Location
Nashville, TN
https://thenextweb.com/syndication/...ially-habitable-exoplanet-for-the-first-time/

With more than 4,000 exoplanets – planets orbiting stars other than our sun – discovered so far, it may seem like we are on the cusp of finding out whether we are alone in the universe. Sadly though, we don’t know much about these planets – in most cases just their mass and their radius.

Understanding whether a planet could host life requires a lot more information. At the moment, one extremely important piece of information that is missing is the presence, composition, and structure of their atmospheres. Signs of atmospheric water, oxygen and methane would all be signs that a planet may support life.

Now we have for the first time managed to detect water vapor in the atmosphere of an exoplanet that is potentially habitable. Our results have been published in Nature Astronomy.

A planet’s atmosphere plays a vital role in shaping the conditions inside it – or on its surface, if it has one. Its composition, stability, and structure all provide important clues about what it is like to be there. Through atmospheric studies, we can, therefore, learn about the history of the planet, investigate its habitability and, ultimately, discover signs of life.

The primary method that we use when examining exoplanets is transit spectroscopy. This involves looking at starlight as a planet passes in front of its host star. As it transits, stellar light is filtered through the planet’s atmosphere – with light being absorbed or deflected based on what compounds the atmosphere consists of.

The atmosphere, therefore, leaves a characteristic footprint in the stellar light that we try to observe. Further analysis can then help us match this footprint to known elements and molecules, such as water or methane.

At the moment, the study of exoplanets atmospheres is limited, as this kind of measurement requires very high precision, which current instruments were not built to deliver. But molecular signatures from water have been found in the atmospheres of gaseous planets, similar to Jupiter or Neptune. It has never before been seen in smaller planets – until now.

K2-18 b was discovered in 2015 and is one of the hundreds of “super-Earths” – planets with a mass between Earth and Neptune – found by NASA’s Kepler spacecraft. It is a planet with eight times the mass of the Earth that orbits a so-called “red dwarf” star, which is much cooler than the sun.

However, K2-18b is located in the “habitable zone” of its star which means it has the right temperature to support liquid water. Given its mass and radius, K2-18 b is not a gaseous planet, but has a high probability of having a rocky surface.

We developed algorithms to analyze the starlight filtered by this planet using transit spectroscopy, with data provided by the Hubble Space Telescope.

This enabled us to make the first successful detection of an atmosphere with water vapor around a non-gaseous planet, which is also located within the habitable zone of its star.

In order for an exoplanet to be defined as habitable, there is a long list of requirements that need to be satisfied. One is that the planet needs to be in the habitable zone where water can exist in liquid form. It is also necessary that the planet has an atmosphere to protect the planet from any harmful radiation coming from its host star.

Another important element is the presence of water, vital for life as we know it. Although there are many other criteria for habitability, such as the presence of oxygen in the atmosphere, our research has made K2-18b the best candidate to date. It is the only exoplanet to fulfill three requirements for habitability: the right temperatures, an atmosphere and the presence of water.

However, we cannot say, with current data, exactly how likely the planet is to support life. Our data are limited to an area of the spectrum – this shows how light is broken down by wavelength – where water dominates, so other molecules can unfortunately not be confirmed.

First of many?
With the next generation of telescopes, such as the James Webb Space Telescope and the ARIEL space mission, we will be able to find more information on the chemical composition, cloud coverage, and structure of the atmosphere of K2-18 b. This will help us understand just how habitable it is.

These missions could also make it easier to make similar detections for other rocky bodies in the habitable zones of their parent stars.

That would certainly be exciting. With K2-18 b being 110 light-years away, it is not really a planet we could visit – even with tiny robotic probes – in the foreseeable future.

Excitingly, it is probably just a matter of time before we find similar planets that are closer. So we may be well on our way to answering the age-old question of whether we are alone in the universe after all.

This article is republished from The Conversation by Angelos Tsiaras, Research Associate of Physics and Astronomy, UCL under a Creative Commons license.
 
Last edited:

noranne

the possibilities are endless
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
1,037
Reaction score
113
Location
Chicago, IL
Website
nora-bailey.com
This is a very cool discovery, but the article posted here is a bit misleading. K2-18b certainly is an exoplanet in the habitable zone, and water vapor was detected, but a potentially habitable exoplanet? Nope. It's got a big volatile envelope--that is, it's more like a smaller version of the ice giants in our Solar System than it is like a big version of Earth.
 

Jason

Ideas bounce around in my head
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 26, 2016
Messages
6,011
Reaction score
1,036
Location
Nashville, TN
This is a very cool discovery, but the article posted here is a bit misleading. K2-18b certainly is an exoplanet in the habitable zone, and water vapor was detected, but a potentially habitable exoplanet? Nope. It's got a big volatile envelope--that is, it's more like a smaller version of the ice giants in our Solar System than it is like a big version of Earth.

Interesting insight there. I'm a bit out of my element though when it comes to the exoplanets. If only there was someone around who had a PhD in Astronomy and Astrophysics from a respectable institution like the University of Chicago who we could go to in order to get a more qualified opinion on this topic, specifically with exoplanets.

Or something like that...

:)

The dangers of posting a link to your homepage! Impressive credentials Nora! :Hail:

Check it out y'all - a real life Jodi Foster! (lame reference to her performance in Contact)...

My only other thought here is tol simply say good luck with the final phase of the program. Does it count that astronomy was the only course my Freshman year I didn't skip (and surprisingly got an A in with the greatest of ease....wonder if there's a causal correlation there LOL)? How about that I can find Orion, the Big Dipper, the Pleiades, and Polaris sans assistance on most nights? No? Oh well... :)
 
Last edited:

Kjbartolotta

Potentially has/is dog
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
4,197
Reaction score
1,049
Location
Los Angeles
Red dwarfs are just full of surprises. And there are sooooooooooo many of them.
 

dickson

Hairy on the inside
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 12, 2017
Messages
3,447
Reaction score
4,142
Location
Directly over the center of the Earth
I recall learning at an astronomy colloquium last year that, to date, not a single photon emitted by any atmospheric constituent of any exoplanet has ever been detected. Detection achieved exclusively by exploiting absorption from the background star. Unsurprising once you think about it, but a striking factoid all the same.
 

noranne

the possibilities are endless
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
1,037
Reaction score
113
Location
Chicago, IL
Website
nora-bailey.com
I recall learning at an astronomy colloquium last year that, to date, not a single photon emitted by any atmospheric constituent of any exoplanet has ever been detected. Detection achieved exclusively by exploiting absorption from the background star. Unsurprising once you think about it, but a striking factoid all the same.

This is mostly true. But there actually are a few planets that we have directly detected with their own photons! These planets are generally huge and very far from their host star, and the light we detect is actually directly emitted from them because they are quite hot. So from those planets we've definitely detected photons from their atmospheres.

But certainly that is a very different case than what is being considered here and in most current atmospheric spectra. It won't be too long in the future (hopefully!) before we can do direct imaging of small, cool planets in reflected light.

Not bad considering it was only 20-some years ago that we confirmed the detection of exoplanets at all!
 

noranne

the possibilities are endless
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
1,037
Reaction score
113
Location
Chicago, IL
Website
nora-bailey.com
Interesting insight there. I'm a bit out of my element though when it comes to the exoplanets. If only there was someone around who had a PhD in Astronomy and Astrophysics from a respectable institution like the University of Chicago who we could go to in order to get a more qualified opinion on this topic, specifically with exoplanets.

Haha thank you so much! I must add a disclaimer that I am just a PhD candidate, certainly not an expert. But I love exoplanets and I'm always happy to try to answer any questions about the field or talk about it!
 

Jason

Ideas bounce around in my head
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 26, 2016
Messages
6,011
Reaction score
1,036
Location
Nashville, TN
Fair enough, but let's just say that by the time you've reached that level of candidacy, the oral defense is pretty much the last step to completion. Not that it's a rubber stamp at all, but by now, you've gained the respect of your field and unless you really f*** things up, odds are in your favor moving forward. I'm guessing at UC, that's an even higher potential for completion than my Master's in B.S.ing (Well, technically Poly Sci, but they're pretty much the same anymore... :) )