WTF--emotional and physical abuse of women during childbirth

Barbara R.

Old Hand in the Biz
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
1,963
Reaction score
242
Location
New York
Website
www.barbararogan.com
I gave birth in 1987 in Brooklyn. The resident Ob-gyn tried to tie my hands down so I wouldn't contaminate the sheet covering me.

To this day I still can't believe it. They used to do that to women prisoners giving birth, but it was declared in humane and outlawed. I was not a prisoner. At the height of labor, I had to fight with that putz to prevent him tying me down. My private doctor, who'd naturally demanded payment in advance, arrived an hour or so after the birth.

My first child, born in Israel, was delivered in hospital by a midwife, with a doctor checking in. It still hurt, of course, but at least I knew the medical staff was on my side.
 

Splendor

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
111
Reaction score
13
I gave birth in 1987 in Brooklyn. The resident Ob-gyn tried to tie my hands down so I wouldn't contaminate the sheet covering me.

To this day I still can't believe it. They used to do that to women prisoners giving birth, but it was declared in humane and outlawed. I was not a prisoner. At the height of labor, I had to fight with that putz to prevent him tying me down. My private doctor, who'd naturally demanded payment in advance, arrived an hour or so after the birth.

My first child, born in Israel, was delivered in hospital by a midwife, with a doctor checking in. It still hurt, of course, but at least I knew the medical staff was on my side.

Shame on these doctors and medical staff.
 

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,130
Reaction score
10,901
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
I gave birth in 1987 in Brooklyn. The resident Ob-gyn tried to tie my hands down so I wouldn't contaminate the sheet covering me.

To this day I still can't believe it. They used to do that to women prisoners giving birth, but it was declared in humane and outlawed. I was not a prisoner. At the height of labor, I had to fight with that putz to prevent him tying me down. My private doctor, who'd naturally demanded payment in advance, arrived an hour or so after the birth..

My God. Stories like this aren't as rare as some people think. I think one culprit is the emphasis on health care delivery as a disconnected process, rather than an interaction with the patient. Doctors want to get in and out to do their job as quickly and "efficiently" as possible, as if they were working on a car instead of a human being. Efficiency does matter in health care, of course, but not if it dehumanizes patients.
 
Last edited:

shadowsminder

writing in the shadows
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 26, 2018
Messages
487
Reaction score
93
Location
USA
Website
shadowsinmind.carrd.co
I've yet to fully recover from the trauma of giving birth, so I'm not going into many details. That was only this decade. The most frustrating part was that I've since been reading about studies that show that all of my instincts were correct. My child and I might deal with the consequences of the staffs' decisions for the rest of our lives.

And I keep reminding myself to feel lucky, because it could've been worse. I knew people at the time who'd had it worse. What's important is that my child survived. I survived.

Yeah, it could've been worse. It could've also been much, much better.

On a related note, hospital food is terrible if you have allergens or sensitivities. Some of the ingredients are considered so unsafe for vulnerable patients that those ingredients are banned on other countries. Here, they're pushed on patients discouraged from bringing in outside food. Patients are expected to deal with the adverse effects on their own.

Meanwhile, formula is pushed on breastfeeding parents, even at the relatively breastfeeding-friendly hospitals, who, apparently, balance out the unhealthy behavior by shaming formula-feeding parents?

The USA needs major shakeups in how medical practioners are educated and employed.
 

thethinker42

Abnormal Romance Author
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 30, 2006
Messages
20,760
Reaction score
2,707
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Website
www.gallagherwitt.com
From about 2004 to 2008, my husband and I thought we wanted kids, but ultimately realized we were happier being childfree. There were a lot of factors that went into the decision, but I'm not gonna lie -- the topic of this thread very much factored in. I spent a lot of time on parenting message boards during that time, and read literally hundreds of birth stories, and there was just.... so much abuse. So much. It was horrific. And the women who were seriously traumatized by it were belittled because "you got a healthy baby out of it, so you have no reason to complain."

The way laboring women are treated is terrifying. Especially since we're military, and military doctors scare me on the best of days. My own civilian and military OB/Gyns were verbally (and in one case, physically) abusive. I miscarried at a military hospital, and the corpsmen in the ER were abusive through the entire thing. I had literal nightmares about what would happen if and when I ever got pregnant and stayed that way.

If we had ultimately decided to have kids, I suspect we would have pursued adoption because of this. Giving birth in an American medical facility - military or civilian - sounds utterly terrifying. More and more, I'm hearing people express the same sentiment, especially my friends who are pregnant -- they're legit scared of giving birth, and not because it's gonna hurt.
 

PiaSophia

Balkan writer of feminist horror stories
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 8, 2019
Messages
631
Reaction score
27
Location
Netherlands
Website
www.pia-sophia.com
As some of you may know, I work as a midwife myself. Working in a hospital, where OB-GYNs dominate the birthing culture, I could tell you many terrifying stories about how women are mistreated. But one woman I will never forget. Background information: this was in an academic hospital in The Netherlands, I was a 2nd year midwifery student.

The night shift had been rather calm. There were two women in labour, both about to meet their firstborn. One of the women was African (let’s call her ‘lady X’), the other Caucasian (I will be referring to her as ‘lady Y’). Lady X didn’t speak Dutch, as she just got here a few months ago, lady Y was right there in her hometown and surrounded by familiars. The births both weren’t going very smooth. Lady X’s baby was in serious distress: it’s heart monitor showed that a caesarean section was the only way to get out safely. It was a matter of minutes that could determine both baby’s and mother’s life or death. It was serious, yet no one told her and she labored through the contractions bravely. Lady Y had been laboring for a long time, close to 24 hours, and still wasn’t fully dilated. She had asked for a caesarean section as she was tired and felt she couldn’t do it anymore. Her baby was doing perfectly fine, as it’s heart monitor showed, and there was no sign that any rush was needed.

The gynaecologists sat calmly in their observation room, drinking their coffee or whatever it was they were drinking, and talking about the current events in the delivery ward. As it was such a calm night shift, there was only one team available to perform C-sections. Thus, only one woman could be helped in the operation room to deliver her baby at the time. I remember feeling agitated: why were they so calm when it was clear that one baby was experiencing serious stress? As a young student, I thought they probably knew better and that I was probably exaggerating. Until I heard the following conversation:

Dr. 1: “Who are we going to do first?” (why was that even a question?!?!)
Dr. 2: “I guess we’ll do lady Y first, she’s been at it longer.” (still, lady Y’s baby was doing great)
Nurse: “Sir, have you seen lady X’s heart monitor?” (clearly worried)
Dr. 1: “Yeah, yeah…”
Dr. 2: “She doesn’t understand anyway.”
And they both walked to the operation room and calmly operated on lady Y while lady X’s baby was fighting for it’s life.

I am glad to tell you that both babies were born alive and left the hospital healthy and well, and both ladies were in cloud nine with their bundle of joy as they recovered from this serious operation. But this situation never left my mind ever since. I wish I had the courage to speak up to the nasty doctors, but I didn’t. It's heartbreaking that this is happening all throughout the entire f-ing world.
 

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,130
Reaction score
10,901
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
Horror stories abound. Birthing is a unique process in modern medical settings. It is a potentially life-threatening condition, where women benefit from state-of-the-art medical equipment, monitoring, and knowledge, but there is also a risk of "over medicalizing" the process to the point where the mother is regarded as a passive recipient of care, rather than an active participant in something that is also natural and necessary.

However, the original article mentioned that there is as serious issue with abusive midwives in less technological settings, so traditional approaches to birthing do not always result in better treatment of women.
 
Last edited:

cbenoi1

Banned
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
977
Location
Canada
Don't know if this warrants its own thread, but I stumbled on this:

Ohio bill orders doctors to ‘reimplant ectopic pregnancy’ or face 'abortion murder' charges
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...eme-abortion-bill-reimplant-ectopic-pregnancy


A bill to ban abortion introduced in the Ohio state legislature requires doctors to “reimplant an ectopic pregnancy” into a woman’s uterus – a procedure that does not exist in medical science – or face charges of “abortion murder”.

This is the second time practicing obstetricians and gynecologists have tried to tell the Ohio legislators that the idea is currently medically impossible.

The move comes amid a wave of increasingly severe anti-abortion bills introduced across much of the country as conservative Republican politicians seek to ban abortion and force a legal showdown on abortion with the supreme court.

Ohio’s move on ectopic pregnancies – where an embryo implants on the mother’s fallopian tube rather than her uterus rendering the pregnancy unviable – is one of the most extreme bills to date.

“I don’t believe I’m typing this again but, that’s impossible,” wrote Ohio obstetrician and gynecologist Dr David Hackney on Twitter. “We’ll all be going to jail,” he said.



-cb
 

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,773
Reaction score
15,242
Location
Massachusetts
The Christian Taliban is alive and well.
 

lizmonster

Possibly A Mermaid Queen
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
14,751
Reaction score
24,799
Location
Massachusetts
Website
elizabethbonesteel.com

Brightdreamer

Just Another Lazy Perfectionist
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
13,077
Reaction score
4,679
Location
USA
Website
brightdreamersbookreviews.blogspot.com
Yeah, a lot of people are pointing out that's not actually possible to do. If they try to enforce this, they will kill people. Not that they care, of course.

The point is to punish women - and if it drives doctors out of business for practicing medicine instead of faith healing, well, so much the better to the American Taliban.
 

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,130
Reaction score
10,901
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
Don't know if this warrants its own thread, but I stumbled on this:

Ohio bill orders doctors to ‘reimplant ectopic pregnancy’ or face 'abortion murder' charges
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...eme-abortion-bill-reimplant-ectopic-pregnancy






-cb

Yet another trial balloon, I'm guessing. A test to see how far they can go in the courts and on which grounds the law is struck down (assuming it is). That will allow them to fine tune future attempts until they find wording that is as restrictive and brutal as possible without triggering the "life and health of the mother" exception.

Or it could be just another crazy, misogynistic, biologically ignorant Republican who wants utter control over women's babymaking apparatus.

It's a coin flip these days.
 

RedRajah

Special Snowflake? No. Hailstone
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 23, 2010
Messages
3,923
Reaction score
2,444
Website
www.fanfiction.net
Gotta make more "Christian soldiers" for the war machine, dontcha know. Just a hop, skip & a jump from criminalizing those who actually want to be sterilized.
 

neandermagnon

Nolite timere, consilium callidum habeo!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Messages
7,325
Reaction score
9,558
Location
Dorset, UK
The Christian Taliban is alive and well.

Islam allows abortion at any stage in pregnancy if it's necessary to save the mother's life. (It also allows abortion before 42 days* for other reasons, because Islam teaches that the soul enters the baby at 42 days* and before that, abortion is seen as amputating part of the mother, not killing an individual.)

*sometimes 126 days depending on how you interpret the wording, but I'm assuming the Taliban follow the stricter interpretation

This post isn't to defend Islamic extremists. (ETA: I have nothing against mainstream Muslims, but obviously the Taliban are extremists and I'm not defending the Taliban or other extremists.) We've all seen the horrors they can inflict. The purpose is to point out that on this issue, the Ohio legislators in question are significantly more extreme.
 
Last edited:

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,130
Reaction score
10,901
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
The Bible says nothing about abortion, one way or the other, which is interesting given how detailed it is in enumerating penalties for women for other "crimes" of a sexual nature. Jewish tradition is also that the life of the mother takes precedence over the life of the fetus.

https://rcrc.org/jewish/

The Evangelical Right's obsession with abortion is a relatively recent phenomenon, and it was created by the GOP in the late 70s to shift the focus of conservative White Southerners, who had begun to enter politics en masse after the Supreme Court decision known as Green vs. Connoly (which outlawed tax exemptions for segregated charitable schools--a refuge for White Southerners who didn't want their kids attending the desegregated public schools). The GOP needed to grow its base and saw White Evangelicals as a group with potential if they could give them something to rally around other than the (as it was regarded at the time, anyway) "done deal" that was desegregation.

https://www.npr.org/2019/06/20/7343...es-evangelicals-history-on-the-abortion-issue

The Catholic Church has also shifted their position on abortion over time, though they've always opposed it. They were originally more concerned about it enabling women to get away with "sexual sin," but wasn't regarded as taking a human life until quite recently.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12178868

It's interesting how decisions made rather cynically, for political reasons, can become so entrenched within such a short time.

Interestingly, White Evangelicals, Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses are the only groups that statistically support making abortion illegal in all or most cases today. Even Roman Catholics are very divided on the issue,

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-ta...roups-vary-widely-in-their-views-of-abortion/

https://www.people-press.org/2019/0...legal-abortion-oppose-overturning-roe-v-wade/

and the majority of US Catholics do not favor overturning Roe V Wade.

One thing that is interesting is the majority of Americans expect that elective abortion will remain largely legal in the US over the next 30 years. They are more confident than I am. The big question I have is whether or not there will be a huge backlash politically if the Supreme Court does partially or completely overturn Roe V Wade, and all abortions become serious crimes in at least some states.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/30/facts-about-abortion-debate-in-america/

Note that this is a bit of a dog leg from the original topic of the thread, but forced pregnancy could be considered a form of abuse, and it certainly doesn't come from respect for women.
 
Last edited: