Anti-gun violence ad: "Back to School Essentials"

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,652
Reaction score
14,888
Location
Massachusetts
I couldn't help noticing that the ad didn't mention restricting guns, but rather "knowing the signs" of an impending school shooting in order to prevent it.

Even the mild admonition of this ad, as though they were reminding us to bring an umbrella in the rainy season, will upset the ammosexuals that hold sway over one of our two political parties.

If it doesn't make americans abands their evil cult of violence, it's just brutal.

Let's face it, most Americans have decided that dead children water the tree of 2nd Amendment Liberty, and are okay with that. If they weren't, they wouldn't be voting for the people they vote for.
 

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,083
Reaction score
10,783
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
The biggest flaw in our political system is the way ultra-wealthy lobbies can block changes the overwhelming majority of Americans, including most gun owners, want.

The NRA works for gun manufacturers, first and foremost, and it's the big businesses that call the shots in the US.

To put it another way, why yes, Virginia, profits are more important than the lives of you and your fellow children.
 
Last edited:

Xelebes

Delerium ex Ennui
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Messages
14,205
Reaction score
884
Location
Edmonton, Canada
I was listening to Beau from the Fifth Column's arguments, as a person of the left and stalwart supporter of the 2nd amendment, and while he points out there are toxic cultural elements about the gun culture, he seems to not recognise that the 2nd amendment's lore is highly poisoned out of context. In that, I think there is a much bigger issue than gun violence that is resulting in this gun violence but the economic dependency on this gun violence to justify further economic dependence. That is, we need the gun manufacturers because they create jobs and demand for steel and other parts of the industrial goods.

The 2nd amendment as the story is told nowadays is a fiction used to justify the continuation of using the arms industry as a means of propping up the economy. And the same logic is used as America and the Soviet Union used in their mass accumulation of nuclear arms. Sure they want to keep building arms because it keeps the industrial capacity to keep producing lanthanides, actinides and other rare earth metals. And so while the capability to produce these elements and the ability to do tests on these metals were interesting, the question of what all these nuclear weapons were going to do remained. Were we going to use them in a war? Hence we get the mental gymnastics the US produced. The "rational man" was concocted as a way of effusing praise onto the inquiring minds in hopes that if the inquiring minds saw themselves as rational, they could assume that the men building these weapons were "rational". And if they were rational, they could create the just-so stories that would convince us "mutually assured destruction" was a sensible policy and that we could continue to build nuclear weapons.

This is of course an older problem. The Arms Races between Germany and Britain, and Italy and Austria-Hungary were economic policies concocted to deal with the pains of the Long Depression. The realpolitik employed by the likes of Bismarck, Disraeli and Gladstone which ultimately led to the Great War was simply a decision to get the factories working again after noblemen lost their most value in their most critical assets, their livestock. That is, escalation was preferable over organic growth when it came to economic policy.

Because the economic policy of escalation has been around for so long, it seems inconceivable to many folks that de-escalation can exist as a policy. Not as a means of brokering peace, because that is too far-fetched, but as a policy that we can have economies sustain themselves without having to escalate. Individuals in the United States who are wrapped up in escalation policy end up not being able to see that de-escalation is important.

And as a result, we are a-massing arms to water the tree of liberty because. . . we can't find reverse? We can't find another gear? And so this video reminds us, that on the local issue of massacres in our schools that de-escalation needs to be thought possible. On the larger scale, de-escalation needs to be sold at this scale so that we can get it on this smaller scale.
 

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,083
Reaction score
10,783
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
Now here's something interesting:

https://www.nbcnews.com/business/bu...king-ar-15s-civilian-sale-says-there-n1056561

This doesn't appear to be motivated by mass shootings.

Colt will suspend production of AR-15 rifles for civilian sales, saying there's an "adequate supply" of the high-powered weapons already in the market, the famed gun manufacturer said Thursday.

The gun-maker, based in West Hartford, Connecticut, said its decision is purely market-driven and made no mention of any public pressure over the AR-15's use in several mass shootings in the United States.

"The fact of the matter is that over the last few years, the market for modern sporting rifles has experienced significant excess manufacturing capacity," Colt President and CEO Dennis Veilleux said in a statement.

Don't think it will make much difference. As they say, there are already plenty on the market, and anyway, there are plenty of other companies that make similar rifles.
 

BlackKnight1974

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 11, 2019
Messages
233
Reaction score
18
Location
Down Range
Now here's something interesting:

https://www.nbcnews.com/business/bu...king-ar-15s-civilian-sale-says-there-n1056561

This doesn't appear to be motivated by mass shootings.



Don't think it will make much difference. As they say, there are already plenty on the market, and anyway, there are plenty of other companies that make similar rifles.

Speaking (as a Brit), it seems a bit cynical by Colt to me. Whenever reform is threatened, US gun owners invariably stock up on AR-15s, 30 round magazines etc etc, and historically, as fears mount over "shortages", numerous companies respond by gouging prices to maximise their profits.

Currently, although there are discussions as regards to reform, there is no impending ban and a very crowded marketplace. Colt are clearly positioning themselves to sell to the military and law enforcement where they can maximise profits by selling to wholesale contracts - however there is no mention as to whether they will continue to sell components to other AR-15 manufacturers. I'd be surprised if they aren't.

And that's before you get to the desirability of having "For Law Enforcement and Military Use Only" stamped on the side...
 

Kjbartolotta

Potentially has/is dog
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
4,197
Reaction score
1,049
Location
Los Angeles
Speaking (as a Brit), it seems a bit cynical by Colt to me. Whenever reform is threatened, US gun owners invariably stock up on AR-15s, 30 round magazines etc etc, and historically, as fears mount over "shortages", numerous companies respond by gouging prices to maximise their profits.

I recall the stockpiling phase that started under Obama, this is a tactic with a history
 

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,083
Reaction score
10,783
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
Speaking (as a Brit), it seems a bit cynical by Colt to me. Whenever reform is threatened, US gun owners invariably stock up on AR-15s, 30 round magazines etc etc, and historically, as fears mount over "shortages", numerous companies respond by gouging prices to maximise their profits.

Currently, although there are discussions as regards to reform, there is no impending ban and a very crowded marketplace. Colt are clearly positioning themselves to sell to the military and law enforcement where they can maximise profits by selling to wholesale contracts - however there is no mention as to whether they will continue to sell components to other AR-15 manufacturers. I'd be surprised if they aren't.

And that's before you get to the desirability of having "For Law Enforcement and Military Use Only" stamped on the side...

I suspect you are right.