About that Cats trailer....

Richard White

Stealthy Plot Bunny Peddler
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 27, 2005
Messages
2,995
Reaction score
606
Location
Central Maryland
Website
www.richardcwhite.com
I always loved how Macavity was a torch song (which is why it's my favorite song, as well as Demeter who helps sing it). I wonder what they're going to do with it in the movie.
 

ElaineA

All about that action, boss.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
8,582
Reaction score
8,525
Location
The Seattle suburbs
Website
www.reneedominick.com
Incoming Unpopular Opinion:

While I agree that the CGI is pretty creepy, I'm actually super excited for the movie. Cats has been my favorite musical since I was like 7 and the cast seems amazing. I don't even care that Taylor Swift is in it, I actually think she might do a decent job (maybe not great, but decent.)

Okay, running to hide from all the pitchforks now.

I don't even agree it's creepy. I don't understand the fuss, so I'll just stand here with you in the Defense Against Pitchforks brigade.

KJ. You're a dog. Human butts with tails should be your thing.

:roll::roll::roll:
 
Last edited:

frimble3

Heckuva good sport
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
11,674
Reaction score
6,577
Location
west coast, canada
I'm not going to see it anyway - I watch musicals for the music, so my previous downloads of the soundtrack will do me fine.
Why would anyone think that, having paid for big expensive actors and singers, the producers would make any choices that wouldn't make their faces as obvious as possible? (But the tails, especially the ones twitching between the legs - were there no editors? It's CGI, not an unfortunate live performance - it could have been fixed!)

And, now that CGI is getting better and better, wait 'til the next big jump: sticking dead actor's faces on live actors. Recasting from beyond the grave!
Or the reverse: You know how the remake of 'Casablanca' never happens because there's no Humphrey Bogart to replace Humphrey Bogart? Now it could be done. The only barrier between us and that is who owns the rights to these stars' likenesses, and how greedy they are.
There have been tests in the past, in product ads - brace for the real thing.
 
Last edited:

Brightdreamer

Just Another Lazy Perfectionist
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
13,074
Reaction score
4,673
Location
USA
Website
brightdreamersbookreviews.blogspot.com
And, now that CGI is getting better and better, wait 'til the next big jump: sticking dead actor's faces on live actors. Recasting from beyond the grave!
Or the reverse: You know how the remake of 'Casablanca' never happens because there's no Humphrey Bogart to replace Humphrey Bogart? Now it could be done. The only barrier between us and that is who owns the rights to these stars' likenesses, and how greedy they are.
There have been tests in the past, in product ads - brace for the real thing.

You say that as if it's not already happening *gestures at Star Wars*

They also used a dead actor in Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow for the villain, IIRC. The tech is here, and it's going to be used. I expect this is a new frontier in contracts: posthumous rights. Sort of like how so many shows are dirt cheap in reruns because they came before residuals were a thing, I expect we'll see a lot of earlier classic actors/actresses used and overused.

Getting back on topic, this one hits all sorts of odd vibes, not just in the uncanny valley. There are conceits that are just easier to swallow in a stage play (and in the original T. S. Eliot poems) than when hyper-realistically portrayed, and humanized cats in an ostensibly real world are just one of them. Barring absolutely spectacular reviews, I'm giving this a pass. And I'm a cat lover.
 

Calla Lily

On hiatus
Staff member
Super Moderator
Moderator
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
39,307
Reaction score
17,490
Location
Non carborundum illegitimi
Website
www.aliceloweecey.net
This thread is the first I've heard of the movie. I saw the musical twice in the 1980s in 2 different cities and it was charming and fun. So I watched the trailer--liked the sets and wasn't too weirded out by the CGI. Then whoever's singing Grizabella cracked on 'Touch me; it's so easy to leave me'.

No. I'm shelving this with the Phantom of the Opera movie--they have to find singers who can act. I lust after Gerard Butler, but he's no Michael Crawford. Betty Buckley killed it as Grizabella. I'm not watching this movie.
 

BenPanced

THE BLUEBERRY QUEEN OF HADES (he/him)
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
17,874
Reaction score
4,667
Location
dunking doughnuts at Dunkin' Donuts
Getting back on topic, this one hits all sorts of odd vibes, not just in the uncanny valley. There are conceits that are just easier to swallow in a stage play (and in the original T. S. Eliot poems) than when hyper-realistically portrayed, and humanized cats in an ostensibly real world are just one of them. Barring absolutely spectacular reviews, I'm giving this a pass. And I'm a cat lover.

And the stage production is singing and dancing actors in make-up and costumes. Why couldn't they have done that for this film? Or considering the centuries of animated anthropomorphic cats, from Felix to Krazy Kat to Tom to Garfield, they couldn't have created animated cats and had the actors voice the characters? Oh, right. Because of centuries of killer special effects in movies that can completely replace singing and dancing actors in make-up and costumes. :sarcasm
 

Albedo

Alex
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 17, 2007
Messages
7,376
Reaction score
2,958
Location
A dimension of pure BEES
I've seen Cats in its Broadway run, as a teenager. And I remember nothing about it, nothing, except the sense of crawling discomfort when one of the cats looked directly at me. (I seem to remember them coming out into the audience, but that might have been a fever dream I had a few nights later?)

And frankly, that wasn't the Uncanny Valley. The cats on stage weren't terrifying to look at, just weirdly disinhibited. Someone upthread had their finger on why these CG creations are so deep in the valley. They're not humans dressed as cats, and they're not anthropomorphic cats, neither of which would be discombobulating. They're just the wrong mix of traits of both. Human cranial structure, but with the ears moved to the top of the head. Naked human bodies with a thin covering of CG fur, with boobs and butts but no genitals or nipples. It's all so ... confusing.

that said, I'm not inherently opposed. A weird, uncomfortable but catchy body horror musical might be just what 2019 needs.
 
Last edited:

Sage

Supreme Guessinator
Staff member
Moderator
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
64,723
Reaction score
22,724
Age
43
Location
Cheering you all on!
I've seen Cats in its Broadway run, as a teenager. And I remember nothing about it, nothing, except the sense of crawling discomfort when one of the cats looked directly at me. (I seem to remember them coming out into the audience, but that might have been a fever dream I had a few nights later?)

The original Broadways production of Cats had them climbing over the seats in the audience
 

Ari Meermans

MacAllister's Official Minion & Greeter
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
12,861
Reaction score
3,071
Location
Not where you last saw me.
I've seen Cats in its Broadway run, as a teenager. And I remember nothing about it, nothing, except the sense of crawling discomfort when one of the cats looked directly at me. (I seem to remember them coming out into the audience, but that might have been a fever dream I had a few nights later?)

And frankly, that wasn't the Uncanny Valley. The cats on stage weren't terrifying to look at, just weirdly disinhibited. Someone upthread had their finger on why these CG creations are so deep in the valley. They're not humans dressed as cats, and they're not anthropomorphic cats, neither of which would be discombobulating. They're just the wrong mix of traits of both. Human cranial structure, but with the ears moved to the top of the head. Naked human bodies with a thin covering of CG fur, with boobs and butts but no genitals or nipples. It's all so ... confusing.

that said, I'm not inherently opposed. A weird, uncomfortable but catchy body horror musical might be just what 2019 needs.

Those are the aspects I find most deeply disturbing as well. There's also the question: why, oh why, are the major male characters wearing human clothing but the major female characters are not? Judi Dench as Old Deuteronomy and Jennifer Hudson as Grizabella are wearing what looks to be fur coats, but still FUR much like in the stage musical. I don't get it and I have an inherent need to understand . . . well, there seems to be an underlying message there I'm not getting. What can I say?

ETA: I'll be passing on this one. I have too many fond memories of the original musical.
 
Last edited:

Dom Perkins

The Idahoan Horror Writer
Registered
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
44
Reaction score
1
Location
Idaho, USA
The whole trailer looks like a fever dream. How much bath salts does it take to convince yourself this was a good idea?