Question about "Expenses" clause in offer contract

mafiaking1936

Nihil debetur. Nihil debens.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2017
Messages
370
Reaction score
100
Location
...from inside the house!!!
I received an offer of representation from a fledgling agency, but there are multiple red flags setting off my spidey sense. I don't know which aspects are truly shady or just me being paranoid. One clause in the contract they sent is entitled "Expenses," and has the following text:

Author shall be responsible for all costs and expenses related to [AGENCY]’s
efforts to pursue publication of the Work (“Expenses”). Such Expenses may include,
but are not limited to, photocopying, postage, and travel expenses. Such Expenses will
be incurred in [AGENCY]’s sole discretion; provided, however, that (i) [AGENCY] shall not incur
travel expenses without prior approval of Author and (ii) Expenses shall not exceed
five hundred dollars ($500.00) without prior approval of Author. In the event that
Author is unavailable or that [AGENCY] believes it is reasonably necessary, [AGENCY] may, in
[AGENCY]’s sole discretion, advance funds to cover Expenses. Author shall reimburse
[AGENCY] for any advanced funds within thirty (30) days after [AGENCY] notifies Author of the
occurrence of an advance.

Is this normal? What does this mean? I don't intend to pay a dime to publish my work, that's what a vanity press is for. I don't expect a small agency to pay for me to travel to a signing or something, but I could see how this clause could be abused by an unscrupulous company. Thanks for any insight!
 

lizmonster

Possibly A Mermaid Queen
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
14,758
Reaction score
24,816
Location
Massachusetts
Website
elizabethbonesteel.com
Yep, they're there. There's only one reported experience, and it's pretty positive, so I was a bit surprised at this.

You could always ask if they'd strike that clause, and see how they respond. You may be pleasantly surprised; I've had places cheerfully strike clauses in contracts, even when I assumed my requests would be contentious.

But I wouldn't sign this contract as-is.

AFAIK, an agency should get paid when you get paid. Any travel or postage or whatever expenses they incur while doing their job is part of their business expenses, and should be covered (more or less) by the flat percentages they get from their authors.

Do you have an agent involved? That might be another avenue of assistance.
nvm insufficient caffeine. :)
 
Last edited:

cool pop

It's Cool, Miss Pop if You're Nasty
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 20, 2009
Messages
660
Reaction score
131
Location
Texas
One positive claim posted about a company on a public message board hardly means the place is reputable. You gotta do extensive homework before signing with people. The person who posted this "positive" claim could be someone who has no idea how an agency is suppose to work or could be someone connected with said agency. You can't use the B&B section alone as proof that a pub or agent is reputable. I've been lurking on AW for years. You won't believe how many people have posted good things and even adamantly defended shady and bad publishers/agents right here on AW so take what you read with a grain of salt. B&B is a great resource but not meant to take the place of research or advice. It's always important to do your homework beyond that.

You have to research the agency, find out what books they've sold, what authors they've worked with, their selling history. It isn't hard because most agents report their sales in industry papers and outlets. You can even Google and might find authors the agency represents and then see if they've had any books sold and to whom.

Even PublishAmerica has had "good reports", means diddily squat because they're awful.

Ergo, this agency sounds shady as hell.
 
Last edited:

Marissa D

Scribe of the girls in the basement
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 22, 2011
Messages
3,071
Reaction score
365
Location
New England but hankering for the old one
Website
www.marissadoyle.com
That clause is partly a carryover from the old days of photocopying and submitting hard copy mss. to editors--I've had something similar in agency contracts, but was never charged by my agents for anything...but I've never seen travel worked into it before. That would be a dealbreaker for me; if they're not in NYC, then travel is simply a part of doing business for them and shouldn't be pinned to any one author.
 

Jeneral

Cat wrangler
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
1,512
Reaction score
274
Location
Florida
Like Marissa said, this clause seems to be pretty standard, leftover from the hard copy days. I've seen it in a few different agency agreements. The travel bit makes me side-eye it though. I'd strike that part.
 

Curlz

cutsie-pie
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 5, 2016
Messages
2,213
Reaction score
382
Location
here
Travel expenses are not standard and it's disturbing that an agent can charge you, for example, to travel to another town to meet an editor (allegedly) and flog your work at a dinner for which you should foot the bill.
 

mafiaking1936

Nihil debetur. Nihil debens.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2017
Messages
370
Reaction score
100
Location
...from inside the house!!!
Thanks for the advice everyone, I have a lot to think about. Another weird thing is, they sent the offer without doing "the call," so I have no idea what they want rewritten or revised, etc. I think I should absolutely require that first before I agree to anything. I hate this because realistically, this might be the only shot I get.

Edit: Here's a draft of my possible reply to this:

Dear [AGENT],


Thank you very much for your offer of representation. Please forgive the lateness of my reply, but I have been out of the country for the last week with limited communication. [This is true, I'm not BSing] You have given me a lot to think about. Most parts of the contract you sent are not disagreeable to me, [Also true, except for the 'expenses' part and one or two other bits] but before I commit to anything I would like to go over the revisions you would like me to make in greater detail to be sure than I am capable of delivering the product you require. It is my understanding that it is standard industry practice to have a telephone discussion prior to any agreement, to make expectations clear and to make best possible use of both your time and mine before additional work is done. Is there a day and time that you would be available? I unfortunately have several meetings and additional travel coming up, [True] but if you are not in a hurry I am happy to work something out.


Thank you once again, and I am looking forward to discussing my novel with you further.

I intentionally avoided using contractions to send the message that I intend to be severely businesslike. Good idea? Bad?
 
Last edited:

Siri Kirpal

Swan in Process
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
3,152
Location
In God I dwell, especially in Eugene OR
Sat Nam! (Literally "Truth Name"--a Sikh greeting)

Be up front about your problems with the clauses. They may well be relict from the bad old photo copy days, but then again... Say what your problems are in that letter, and then say you'd like an answer on whether they'll strike those clauses first...and then you might be interested if you have a phone call first. This may sound hard line to you, but really, if they're going to balk at removing the bad guy clauses, you don't want to do business with them.

Blessings,

Siri Kirpal
 

frimble3

Heckuva good sport
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
11,686
Reaction score
6,592
Location
west coast, canada
Travel expenses are not standard and it's disturbing that an agent can charge you, for example, to travel to another town to meet an editor (allegedly) and flog your work at a dinner for which you should foot the bill.
Or, make a tour of all the bookfairs and conventions on your dime. Heck, I'll bet there are bookstores wherever your agent vacations.

Thanks for the advice everyone, I have a lot to think about. Another weird thing is, they sent the offer without doing "the call," so I have no idea what they want rewritten or revised, etc. I think I should absolutely require that first before I agree to anything. I hate this because realistically, this might be the only shot I get.

Edit: Here's a draft of my possible reply to this:



I intentionally avoided using contractions to send the message that I intend to be severely businesslike. Good idea? Bad?

'Severely' businesslike is sending it on a lawyer's letterhead.
You are just being polite. And, lengthy, which, if I were a dodgy businessman, might suggest that you are more likely to tiptoe around an uncomfortable situation than come at it head-on, and therefore be an easy target.

Sat Nam! (Literally "Truth Name"--a Sikh greeting)

Be up front about your problems with the clauses. They may well be relict from the bad old photo copy days, but then again... Say what your problems are in that letter, and then say you'd like an answer on whether they'll strike those clauses first...and then you might be interested if you have a phone call first. This may sound hard line to you, but really, if they're going to balk at removing the bad guy clauses, you don't want to do business with them.

Blessings,

Siri Kirpal
Bolding for emphasis. You want to get this settled first.
Then,
worry about revisions and expectations.
What if they make wonderful promises about your work, and your own pet editor, and how they looove your stuff so much, and wouldn't dream of changing a word of it, unless, of course, you think of anything you might want to change. They make talk of the booktour, and the massive sales, and the cover artist who will do whatever you want.
And, in the end, the picture is so dazzling that when they say "No, we're not changing a word of our contract", you can't bear to give up the dream.
Better to get the hard bits settled first, before chances are taken.
 
Last edited:

Carrie in PA

Write All The Words!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
1,942
Reaction score
1,078
Location
in my own little world
Sat Nam! (Literally "Truth Name"--a Sikh greeting)

Be up front about your problems with the clauses. They may well be relict from the bad old photo copy days, but then again... Say what your problems are in that letter, and then say you'd like an answer on whether they'll strike those clauses first...and then you might be interested if you have a phone call first. This may sound hard line to you, but really, if they're going to balk at removing the bad guy clauses, you don't want to do business with them.

Blessings,

Siri Kirpal


^^^ All of this.
 

Fuchsia Groan

Becoming a laptop-human hybrid
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Messages
2,871
Reaction score
1,402
Location
The windswept northern wastes
I had a clause like yours in my contract and was never charged anything. Don’t recall if “travel” was included, just photocopying and mailing.

I would definitely get on the phone with the offering agent before signing anything. They are not going to parse your email as long as it’s clear and professional. But you need to know the agent’s background and/or what they’ve already sold. If you’re not finding that online, a phone call is the place to ask. Don’t be afraid to be direct. Then verify what you’re told. (I subscribed to PM for a month or so specifically for that purpose.) Also, as you’ve said, it’s best to be able to discuss revisions by phone. My agent followed up with notes, but we talked first. Most agents do that to get a sense of how you’d be to work with.
 

mafiaking1936

Nihil debetur. Nihil debens.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2017
Messages
370
Reaction score
100
Location
...from inside the house!!!
Thanks again everyone. Clearly I'm even more clueless about this process than I thought! I think I'll just scrap the email and ask for a phone conversation.