White House bans CNN's Jim Acosta

Night_Writer

It's all symbolic.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
86
Location
The New World
It used to be that reporters covered the news. Now they ARE the news. Donald Trump did that. He made the press its own top story.
 

Ari Meermans

MacAllister's Official Minion & Greeter
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
12,861
Reaction score
3,071
Location
Not where you last saw me.
According to Maggie Haberman of the Times, Jim Acosta received a letter from the WH telling him they'd be yanking his pass again after the judge's order expires. Pissants, the lot of them.
 

Larry M

Banned
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
1,057
Reaction score
331
Location
Texas
Website
www.amazon.com
According to Maggie Haberman of the Times, Jim Acosta received a letter from the WH telling him they'd be yanking his pass again after the judge's order expires. Pissants, the lot of them.

This is yet again, a perfect example of the immaturity of the person posing as president, and the ineptitude of his staff. Any intelligent human says, "this is a stupid fight, so let's not do it."

But no, not this shit show of an "administration."
 

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,783
Reaction score
15,271
Location
Massachusetts
My view is that reporters can and should be able to ask the toughest questions they can think of to the POTUS, or anyone else serving in government.

Agreed.

That being said there has to be a point of order and behavior protocol. Acosta wasn't banned for tough questions. If that was the case he would have been banned a long time ago.

I see a steady ramping up by this president of rhetoric against the press. Having an adversarial relationship with them is nothing new. Calling them the “enemy of the people” is, at least in the U.S. That’s language that dictators use, and it’s very unsettling to hear a U.S. president utter it, repeatedly.

I watched the portion of that press conference. I saw nothing unusual or disrespectful in Acosta’s behavior. Aggressive? Perhaps. It was clear, to me at least, that Trump simply didn’t like the questions asked.

What do you think in Acosta’s questions or manner of asking them were so beyond the pale that it merited having his hard pass revoked?

If you are honestly implying that a POTUS banning one reporter from press conferences is going to lead all the media in the country to being a mouthpiece for the WH I'd say that is a really long stretch.

Our press already has an abysmal record of asking hard questions of our politicians, and insisting on getting real answers. Denying a press pass to anyone who asks questions the president doesn’t like absolutely will move us further down the road of nothing but softball questions and useless fawning interviews. How could it not?
 

cbenoi1

Banned
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
977
Location
Canada
According to Maggie Haberman of the Times, Jim Acosta received a letter from the WH telling him they'd be yanking his pass again after the judge's order expires. Pissants, the lot of them.

This is recent:

CNN asks for emergency hearing after Trump threatens to revoke Acosta's press pass again
https://absolutewrite.com/forums/sh...bans-CNN-s-Jim-Acosta&p=10480818#post10480818

Later that same day, the White House sent Acosta a formal letter outlining a "preliminary decision" to suspend his pass. The letter -- signed by two of the defendants in the suit, press secretary Sarah Sanders and deputy chief of staff for communications Bill Shine --cited Acosta's conduct at President Trump's November 7 press conference, where he asked multiple follow-up questions and didn't give up the microphone right away.

"You failed to abide" by "basic, widely understood practices," the letter to Acosta claimed.

Many journalists have challenged the administration's actions against Acosta, pointing out that aggressive questioning is a tradition that dates back decades.

Funny thing is, no other reporter in the room filed a complaint about Acosta not giving up the mic.

-cb
 
Last edited:

lizmonster

Possibly A Mermaid Queen
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
14,760
Reaction score
24,839
Location
Massachusetts
Website
elizabethbonesteel.com
I don't know whether to laugh or scream at this administration trying to use a violation of "basic, widely understood practices" as an accusation against someone else...
 

cbenoi1

Banned
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
977
Location
Canada
White House backs down from legal fight, restores Jim Acosta's press pass
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/19/media/cnn-acosta-emergency-hearing/index.html

Backs down? Really?

"Having received a formal reply from your counsel to our letter of November 16, we have made a final determination in this process: your hard pass is restored," the White House said in a new letter to Acosta. "Should you refuse to follow these rules in the future, we will take action in accordance with the rules set forth above. The President is aware of this decision and concurs."

The letter detailed several new rules for reporter conduct at presidential press conferences, including "a single question" from each journalist. Follow-ups will only be permitted "at the discretion of the President or other White House officials."

I'm eager to know how the other reporters feel about those new rules.

-cb
 

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,783
Reaction score
15,271
Location
Massachusetts
Such a circus, while Rome burns and Nero throws gasoline in all directions. Sigh.
 

Lyv

I meant to do that.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 5, 2007
Messages
4,958
Reaction score
1,934
Location
Outside Boston
April Ryan asked Trump about "Rep. Cummings' wanting to investigate Ivanka's emails" and Trump pointed at her and walked away. There's video at the link. Is he saying, "You're next to lose your credentials" even though they had to give Jim Acosta's back? That has to be grating on this petty, unwell man. It could be his usual rudeness, but given his steadfast, enthusiastic support of Saudi Arabia's crown prince despite his culpability for the murder of a journalist, I expect he'll ramp up his war on journalists (especially women of color).