That's embarrassing. Do they think we're actually ruled out of Washington? Does their voice matter or are they ensuring their voice doesn't matter?
That's embarrassing. Do they think we're actually ruled out of Washington? Does their voice matter or are they ensuring their voice doesn't matter?
Well, the protest was in front of the U.S. consulate, so I imagine it was the closest they could get to 'Washington'. I think their intention was to take part in the protests and show their support as best they could.That's embarrassing. Do they think we're actually ruled out of Washington? Does their voice matter or are they ensuring their voice doesn't matter?
That's embarrassing. Do they think we're actually ruled out of Washington? Does their voice matter or are they ensuring their voice doesn't matter?
According to The Hill Trump denies knowing Whitaker at all before he appointed him, never spoke to him about the Russia investigation before deciding to appoint him, and chose him only because Whitaker was already at DOJ and had a great reputation in the law enforcement community. (Hannity must have been the reference, assuming anyone at all actually described Whitaker that way.)
If you believe this string of lies, I am sorry to tell you that you are under a curse that has attached itself to your money, and the only way to break the curse is for you to liquidate every asset you have, pack the cash in sturdy cartons and mail it to my PO Box number. I will perform the necessary cleansing ritual. Some or all of your money might be destroyed in the process, but you don't want to live cursed all your life, now do you?
I... don't understand at all why this would be embarrassing. There were protests all over the U.S. This one was just a bit further afield for Americans who happened to be in Canada. And obviously their voices WERE heard, at least a bit, seeing as it made the news.
Unless you mean it could be interpreted as Canada being ruled out of Washington? I don't see how anyone could get that impression from the linked article. The fact that the protesters are American is mentioned right in the title.
If they are Americans in Vancouver protesting, fine. But if it is Canadiuans protesting. . . it's sad. It would be a sign that we haven't given up the colonial way of thinking.
AFAIK, it was 50 American protestors, and the protest was organized by a group called 'Democrats Abroad'. Canada may be a democracy, but 'Democrats' is not one of our political groups. There were also 'supporters' of no specified nationality, but I assume that they are of the 'friends, families, co-workers' nature, rather than random Canadians.If they are Americans in Vancouver protesting, fine. But if it is Canadiuans protesting. . . it's sad. It would be a sign that we haven't given up the colonial way of thinking.
So you think Canadians in support of the American people who are not in support of this insane/inane POTUS suggests colonial thinking?
You are a great Canadian, following politics, and apologising for mixing stuff up! We need more people like you.It was. I apologise. I was mixing two debates (a debate elsewhere) and this which I shouldn't have done.
No US colonies, but there have been border disputes over the years. (Chiefly in the early days, when both countries were expanding, and there were no official borders.)Now that the comment is explained, I sort of get it, although I'm ignorant enough of the history of Canada to have to ask if the US ever had colonies there.
Legal scholars, including several conservatives, also argued that Whitaker's appointment was unconstitutional because he is not a Senate-confirmed administration official. The White House maintains it is on firm legal ground with the Whitaker appointment.
Here's a lovely catch-22.
White House digging in on selection of Matt Whitaker as temporary replacement for Sessions
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/13/politics/white-house-whitaker/index.html
Let me get this right.
Mueller's appointment is not legitimate because it was not approved by the Senate ( clicky ), and yet Whitaker's appointment doesn't need Senate approbation ( clicky) ?
You can't have it both ways, me thinks.
-cb
You can in Upside Down Land, which is where we currently are.
Alternative facts, alternative logic...
Under Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the Trump administration had stopped defending key parts of the Affordable Care Act in court on the grounds that the law became unconstitutional when Congress repealed the tax penalty for individuals' failure to buy health insurance.
Maryland filed suit against Sessions challenging that position.
But now that Sessions is no longer attorney general, Maryland is buttressing its argument. The state contends that Whitaker was unlawfully named acting attorney general, and so he has no authority to respond to its lawsuit.
The lawsuit, filed by Senators Richard Blumenthal, Sheldon Whitehouse and Senator Mazie Hirono, asks a federal court in Washington to deem the appointment unconstitutional and bar Whitaker from serving as the top U.S. law enforcement official. The senators are members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which customarily reviews attorney general nominations.