Thought it needed a new thread besides the Kennedy retirement discussion.
It's easy to find all the bad stuff about the man, even though Grassley (Republican head of the Judiciary Committee) claimed Kavanaugh voted with the majority on the appeals court 97% of the time. I find that hard to believe.
There is a clear record of documented votes and other actions of Kavanaugh that leaves a trail of his beliefs and positions: Church and state should not be separate. You can guess what that means for the LGBTQ and Muslim communities. He's clearly anti-abortion, given he was instrumental trying to deny the immigrant teen in ICE custody an abortion. And he sides with Thomas and Alito when it comes to corporate over individuals. He's voted against unions.
There's more.
There's been a big kerfuffle over Trump refusing to turn over certain documents from the Bush era. Now what could possibly be in those documents that might be so damaging?
Well, there's a suggestion of evidence Kavanaugh perjured himself in a past confirmation hearing. I did not know that. And it involves Bush's disgusting venture into torture.
From the left wing Alternet (go with the facts now, not the handwaving away): Trump's Supreme Court Pick May Have Committed Perjury — And the GOP Appears to Be Suppressing Evidence that Could Prove It
Well here we go, this is something that isn't out much in the public discourse:
And then there's the perjury and the Grassley coverup:
Please share this information, it needs airing.
It's easy to find all the bad stuff about the man, even though Grassley (Republican head of the Judiciary Committee) claimed Kavanaugh voted with the majority on the appeals court 97% of the time. I find that hard to believe.
There is a clear record of documented votes and other actions of Kavanaugh that leaves a trail of his beliefs and positions: Church and state should not be separate. You can guess what that means for the LGBTQ and Muslim communities. He's clearly anti-abortion, given he was instrumental trying to deny the immigrant teen in ICE custody an abortion. And he sides with Thomas and Alito when it comes to corporate over individuals. He's voted against unions.
There's more.
There's been a big kerfuffle over Trump refusing to turn over certain documents from the Bush era. Now what could possibly be in those documents that might be so damaging?
Well, there's a suggestion of evidence Kavanaugh perjured himself in a past confirmation hearing. I did not know that. And it involves Bush's disgusting venture into torture.
From the left wing Alternet (go with the facts now, not the handwaving away): Trump's Supreme Court Pick May Have Committed Perjury — And the GOP Appears to Be Suppressing Evidence that Could Prove It
Sen. Patrick Leahy asserts Republicans were ready to request Brett Kavanaugh's records ... until they weren't.
Well here we go, this is something that isn't out much in the public discourse:
One of the top concerns of Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding President Donald Trump's Supreme Court Nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, is whether he knew anything about, authorized, or advised the Bush administration on their torture program for detainees in the War on Terror while he served as White House staff secretary.
And then there's the perjury and the Grassley coverup:
In 2006, during his confirmation to the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh told senators, under oath, that he was "not involved in the questions about the rules governing detention of combatants," and had no knowledge of issues about "the legal justifications or the policies relating to the treatment of detainees," according to NBC News. However, Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), and Dick Durbin (D-IL) assert that multiple documents and email chains show Kavanaugh was briefed on the issue, implying he was not honest with the Senate.
Some of the documents Judiciary Democrats say prove Kavanaugh's knowledge of the torture program, and potentially even suggest that he perjured himself in his earlier confirmation, have been marked "Committee Confidential" by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) — meaning that even most senators are not allowed to review them.
Please share this information, it needs airing.
Last edited: