- Joined
- Sep 20, 2011
- Messages
- 987
- Reaction score
- 789
- Location
- Bucharest, Romania
- Website
- caribbeandawn1720.jcink.net
Some people say I shouldn't, but the story wants to be told. And it makes sense: people aren't going to be teenagers forever. They grow up. And even those who have screwed up once, have their opportunities to make things right. Nothing is unsalvageable, as long as there is the will to change (and some support for it). This is also a powerful message, not only the coming of age.
On the other side, I heard that if the two novels can be read one without the other, developing the characters in their own independent way, it is OK. Which is how my novels are going to be. The characters who were once teenagers don't have the same personality when they are 40. They have grown up. They have suffered. So the sequel will show them as they are at the maturity age.
The idea had just come to me recently, and it started growing with details. One would say that I am still in love with the characters after completing the first novel. I might be, it is nothing wrong with it. The first novel (in this sort of duo) had been written decades ago (like the other 3 in my signature, which are already published) and polished now for publishing. The sequel will be written next year (as first I have others to finish, and the story, which has just dawned on me, has time to ripe, while I have time to research). Contemporary romance is not my strong point, but I think I can make it.
A secondary character who was in high school and recently graduating high school in the main part of my first novel (which has 2 last chapters, with the value of a sort of an epilogue, showing how the years have passed and it ends with a scene 20 years later) can have their redemption arc in a second novel, starting one year after the moment the first novel had ended. Some characters' stories had been told and completed. This secondary character's has redemption potential in another story, which will be a mature romance (mature not as in explicit, because none of my writings is explicit. There are sweet romances too. But mature as in the second chance at happiness offered by life to a 40 years old man).
Well, some people said I can't make it. Should I prove them wrong?
On the other side, I heard that if the two novels can be read one without the other, developing the characters in their own independent way, it is OK. Which is how my novels are going to be. The characters who were once teenagers don't have the same personality when they are 40. They have grown up. They have suffered. So the sequel will show them as they are at the maturity age.
The idea had just come to me recently, and it started growing with details. One would say that I am still in love with the characters after completing the first novel. I might be, it is nothing wrong with it. The first novel (in this sort of duo) had been written decades ago (like the other 3 in my signature, which are already published) and polished now for publishing. The sequel will be written next year (as first I have others to finish, and the story, which has just dawned on me, has time to ripe, while I have time to research). Contemporary romance is not my strong point, but I think I can make it.
A secondary character who was in high school and recently graduating high school in the main part of my first novel (which has 2 last chapters, with the value of a sort of an epilogue, showing how the years have passed and it ends with a scene 20 years later) can have their redemption arc in a second novel, starting one year after the moment the first novel had ended. Some characters' stories had been told and completed. This secondary character's has redemption potential in another story, which will be a mature romance (mature not as in explicit, because none of my writings is explicit. There are sweet romances too. But mature as in the second chance at happiness offered by life to a 40 years old man).
Well, some people said I can't make it. Should I prove them wrong?