• This forum is specifically for the discussion of factual science and technology. When the topic moves to speculation, then it needs to also move to the parent forum, Science Fiction and Fantasy (SF/F).

    If the topic of a discussion becomes political, even remotely so, then it immediately does no longer belong here. Failure to comply with these simple and reasonable guidelines will result in one of the following.
    1. the thread will be moved to the appropriate forum
    2. the thread will be closed to further posts.
    3. the thread will remain, but the posts that deviate from the topic will be relocated or deleted.
    Thank you for understanding.​

Physics: The Peculiar Math That Could Underlie the Laws of Nature

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
10,771
Reaction score
15,239
Location
Massachusetts
New findings are fueling an old suspicion that fundamental particles and forces spring from strange eight-part numbers called “octonions.”

Quanta Magazine said:
In 2014, a graduate student at the University of Waterloo, Canada, named Cohl Furey rented a car and drove six hours south to Pennsylvania State University, eager to talk to a physics professor there named Murat Günaydin. Furey had figured out how to build on a finding of Günaydin’s from 40 years earlier — a largely forgotten result that supported a powerful suspicion about fundamental physics and its relationship to pure math.

The suspicion, harbored by many physicists and mathematicians over the decades but rarely actively pursued, is that the peculiar panoply of forces and particles that comprise reality spring logically from the properties of eight-dimensional numbers called “octonions.”

As numbers go, the familiar real numbers — those found on the number line, like 1, π and -83.777 — just get things started. Real numbers can be paired up in a particular way to form “complex numbers,” first studied in 16th-century Italy, that behave like coordinates on a 2-D plane. Adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing is like translating and rotating positions around the plane. Complex numbers, suitably paired, form 4-D “quaternions,” discovered in 1843 by the Irish mathematician William Rowan Hamilton, who on the spot ecstatically chiseled the formula into Dublin’s Broome Bridge. John Graves, a lawyer friend of Hamilton’s, subsequently showed that pairs of quaternions make octonions: numbers that define coordinates in an abstract 8-D space.

There the game stops. Proof surfaced in 1898 that the reals, complex numbers, quaternions and octonions are the only kinds of numbers that can be added, subtracted, multiplied and divided. The first three of these “division algebras” would soon lay the mathematical foundation for 20th-century physics, with real numbers appearing ubiquitously, complex numbers providing the math of quantum mechanics, and quaternions underlying Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity. This has led many researchers to wonder about the last and least-understood division algebra. Might the octonions hold secrets of the universe?

“Octonions are to physics what the Sirens were to Ulysses,” Pierre Ramond, a particle physicist and string theorist at the University of Florida, said in an email.

Günaydin, the Penn State professor, was a graduate student at Yale in 1973 when he and his advisor Feza Gürsey found a surprising link between the octonions and the strong force, which binds quarks together inside atomic nuclei. An initial flurry of interest in the finding didn’t last. Everyone at the time was puzzling over the Standard Model of particle physics — the set of equations describing the known elementary particles and their interactions via the strong, weak and electromagnetic forces (all the fundamental forces except gravity). But rather than seek mathematical answers to the Standard Model’s mysteries, most physicists placed their hopes in high-energy particle colliders and other experiments, expecting additional particles to show up and lead the way beyond the Standard Model to a deeper description of reality. They “imagined that the next bit of progress will come from some new pieces being dropped onto the table, [rather than] from thinking harder about the pieces we already have,” said Latham Boyle, a theoretical physicist at the Perimeter Institute of Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Canada.

Decades on, no particles beyond those of the Standard Model have been found. Meanwhile, the strange beauty of the octonions has continued to attract the occasional independent-minded researcher, including Furey, the Canadian grad student who visited Günaydin four years ago. Looking like an interplanetary traveler, with choppy silver bangs that taper to a point between piercing blue eyes, Furey scrawled esoteric symbols on a blackboard, trying to explain to Günaydin that she had extended his and Gürsey’s work by constructing an octonionic model of both the strong and electromagnetic forces.

...
 

shadowsminder

writing in the shadows
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 26, 2018
Messages
487
Reaction score
93
Location
USA
Website
shadowsinmind.carrd.co
Correction, a brilliant woman physicist. :)

She's gorgeous, too. Wow. (I'll get to the topic.)

Her bio reads like a character sheet for a kickass Urban Fantasy MC. (Seriously, I'll get there.)

The Fano plane looks like the Deathly Hallows symbol with two more wands. The term octonions is fantastical. This looks like the math of magic. Did you see the symbols she uses?

To reconstruct particle physics, Furey uses the product of the four division algebras, [FONT=MathJax_AMS]R[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_Main]⊗[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_AMS]C[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_Main]⊗[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_AMS]H[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_Main]⊗[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_AMS]O[/FONT] ([FONT=MathJax_AMS]R[/FONT] for reals, [FONT=MathJax_AMS]C[/FONT] for complex numbers, [FONT=MathJax_AMS]H[/FONT] for quaternions and [FONT=MathJax_AMS]O[/FONT] for octonions) — sometimes called the Dixon algebra[...].

Whereas Dixon and others proceeded by mixing the division algebras with extra mathematical machinery, Furey restricts herself; in her scheme, the algebras “act on themselves.” Combined as [FONT=MathJax_AMS]R[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_Main]⊗[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_AMS]C[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_Main]⊗[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_AMS]H[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_Main]⊗[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_AMS]O[/FONT], the four number systems form a 64-dimensional abstract space. Within this space, in Furey’s model, particles are mathematical “ideals”: elements of a subspace that, when multiplied by other elements, stay in that subspace, allowing particles to stay particles even as they move, rotate, interact and transform. The idea is that these mathematical ideals are the particles of nature, and they manifest the symmetries of [FONT=MathJax_AMS]R[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_Main]⊗[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_AMS]C[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_Main]⊗[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_AMS]H[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_Main]⊗[/FONT][FONT=MathJax_AMS]O[/FONT].

It's witchcraft! How cool! (Okay, I'm done.)

News like this makes me wish I'd trained my mind to better understand complex math.
 

nickj47

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 10, 2018
Messages
261
Reaction score
47
Location
Novato, CA
Nothing peculiar about the math, though it does start to get difficult to visualize. A great explanation of complex numbers, quarternions, and all the other match used to describe the standard model can be found in Roger Penrose's Road to Reality. Great book.