I didn't see another thread for this, and I'm surprised no one brought it up yet. Michelle Wolf hit quite a nerve with her speech at the WHCD.
Michelle Wolf hit quite a nerve with her speech at the WHCD.
"'It's why America hates the out of touch leftist media elite,' Ms. Schlapp tweeted from a limousine en route to an exclusive after-party organized by NBC/MSNBC."
I'm most annoyed by WHO is fomenting the clutching.
First, take out the expected manufactured/amplified outrage. It is especially worse with this snowflake POTUS.
You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it, you can do anything. Grab them by the pussy, you can do anything.
Fox viewers give low marks to bimbo @MegynKelly will consider other programs!
blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her... wherever.
If Hillary Clinton can't satisfy her husband what makes her think she can satisfy America?
@ariannahuff is unattractive both inside and out. I fully understand why her former husband left her for a man- he made a good decision.
Terry Gross on Fresh Air is interviewing Michelle Wolf and it's even funnier the second time around.
Excerpts: 'Fresh Air' Interview with Michelle Wolf
Wolf went after everybody. How can others not see that? She went after CNN and lefts and rights and everyone! She just spoke truth, IMO, in a funny way.
I'm most annoyed by WHO is fomenting the clutching. Andrea Mitchell (NBC) Maggie Haberman (NYT) and Mika Brzezinski, among the people most commonly lied to by this administration, but enablers of his election, all. GMAFB
Introducing the "Daily Show" comic, White House Correspondents' Association President Margaret Talev praised Wolf as someone who was very much not part of the world of Washington. That was seen as a good thing, given that the criticism of Washington and its denizens since the election of Trump is that they/we are deeply out of touch with normal Americans. (A coastal comedian is not exactly "regular" people, but whatever.) I wonder whether Talev thought Wolf's I-could-care-less-about-any-of-you approach was such a great idea after the comedian's speech.
Most comedians who speak at the correspondents' dinner take a fair number of shots at the attendees in the room. But they also play along with theme of the night, which attempts to be a celebration of the free and independent media as well as a chance to shine a light on some of the best journalists in the country.
There are LOTS of way to go after Sanders. I personally think that she is overly antagonistic to the reporters who cover the White House and misleads on the regular. But to make fun of Sanders' makeup? ("I think she's very resourceful, like she burns facts and then she uses that ash to create a perfect smokey eye. Maybe she's born with it, maybe it's lies," said Wolf.) Like, really?
I know lots of liberals will -- and already have via Twitter -- painted the attacks on Sanders as the press secretary getting what she deserved. I don't subscribe to that idea. Sanders showed up, sat on the dais and played along. She knew she was likely to get made fun of. But she would have no reasonable expectation that Wolf would go after her looks and refer to her as an "Uncle Tom, but for white women who disappoint other white women."
I'm stunned that Sanders sat five feet away from Wolf and just took it.
Being funny is one thing. Bullying people because you can is another. And Wolf's treatment of Sanders was bullying.
And, yes, by the way, Trump is a massive bully. Making fun of a disabled reporter, stereotyping ethnic groups, attacking reporters for how they look -- all of that stuff is totally and completely unacceptable. And he knows exactly what he is doing, which makes it worse.
But two wrongs don't make it right. Because Trump bullied a disabled reporter doesn't mean Wolf should be able to bully Sarah Sanders. Bullying is bullying. And it's wrong. Always.
It wasn't funny. If she wants to insult someone to their face but with class, style, and humor she should study Don Rickles. He was THE Master.
It wasn't funny. If she wants to insult someone to their face but with class, style, and humor she should study Don Rickles. He was THE Master.
It wasn't funny. If she wants to insult someone to their face but with class, style, and humor she should study Don Rickles. He was THE Master.
...Her comedy is not of the domestic or slapstick variety, but of social commentary which is more than necessary at this time. In addition, comedy is much more than being "funny" and at the dinner, being "funny" was not actually the point of what she wanted to achieve, which was to use her platform as a comedian, to point out certain truths to the audience - Trump, the political parties, and the reporters who follow them. She more than did that.
Is that like a true Scotsman?A true "Roast" is intended to honor a specific individual with amusing jokes about the person. This was not a "Roast".
I'm not buying this.I thought it was supposed to be comedy. I didn't find it funny.
And now the WHC Association is giving serious thought to changing the format of the dinner. In part because of Wolf's performance. (Also because the President hasn't attended for 2 years - and they've been thinking about it for some years). Just maybe her talk finally pushed them over the edge.