A thread for important news happening under the cover of the Great Distractor (thread expanded)

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,833
Reaction score
6,594
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
... , so we don't lose sight of the damage done.

Most recently we have: Oklahoma Rep. Jim Bridenstine, who has no formal science education, is the president's choice to be NASA's new administrator.
On Friday night, however, the White House announced that the president's pick to be NASA's 13th administrator wouldn't be someone with deep space credentials and all-party support.

Instead, he's nominating Oklahoma GOP Congressman Jim Bridenstine, who's appointment needs approval [was approved after Jeff Flake's vote of approval was bought off] by the Senate. If confirmed, he would become the first elected official to hold the position.

An early Trump supporter, Bridenstine had reportedly lobbied Trump for the job for some time.

He's long been interested in space and in bringing more business interests into the future of space travel. He authored the American Space Renaissance Act, which sought to bring new approaches, including a 20-year plan for NASA. It didn't pass into law, but some of its thoughts were introduced into other legislation.

Bridenstine is also a former executive director of the Tulsa Air and Space Museum and Planetarium and sits on the House Armed Services Committee and the Science, Space and Technology Committee.

But the fact that he is a politician without scientific credentials -- he studied economics, business and psychology at Rice University in Houston, Texas and has an MBA from Cornell -- has caused some to bridle, even on his own political side.
Surprise: a climate change denier who wants to privatize NASA and reap a few crony benefits while he's at it.

There's a long list that belongs in this thread. I'll be adding more and I'm sure others will as well.


Edited to expand the thread to important news getting little coverage because of the Trump TV.
 
Last edited:

AW Admin

Administrator
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Messages
18,772
Reaction score
6,288
Please keep in mind the activism part of the forum title.

What can people who want to counteract this do? Who do they call? Who should they write?

What needs to be changed?
 

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,833
Reaction score
6,594
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
Please keep in mind the activism part of the forum title.

What can people who want to counteract this do? Who do they call? Who should they write?

What needs to be changed?
All good points. Step one, people need to know what is happening.

He's been confirmed, we can't do much about that now. But we can keep an eye on him and take action if he moves on things to benefit himself like many of Trump's appointments have, or if he moves to destroy climate change evidence or end NASA's role in climate research.

At the moment, I think corruption is the first thing we'll see because he has a history.

Daily Beast: How Trump’s NASA Nominee Used a Nonprofit He Ran to Benefit Himself
For this lack of technical experience—along with a skepticism of climate change and opposition to LGBT rights — Bridenstine has faced sharp criticism on the Hill. But another issue may soon end up complicating his nomination. [It didn't.]

An investigation and review of public records by the Project On Government Oversight shows that, prior to his time in Congress, Bridenstine led a small non-profit organization into hefty financial losses. Some of the losses involved the use of the non-profit’s resources to benefit a company that Bridenstine simultaneously co-owned and in which he’d invested substantial sums of his own money.
 
Last edited:

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,130
Reaction score
10,900
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
This isn't political news, but it's an example of how the stuff happening in Washington has eclipsed everything else.

One thing that's happened in the past week that has barely been in the news at all was massive rainfall and flooding in Hawaii, particularly Kauai (last weekend, but it's still going on). The only reason I heard about this is I know someone online who lives over there, and she posted that she was all right on facebook, so I looked it up. A few news outlets have run stories on it, but even though hundreds of people had to be evacuated, the stories were mostly buried. NPR and PRI (I get a lot of my day-to-day news from our local public radio station when I'm driving around) didn't cover it at all for several days (they finally ran this story three days ago).

There are relief funds for victims, but you have to go looking for them. There's a tendency to think everyone in Hawaii is rich, but that isn't the case.

Some also may not know that people in Puerto Rico don't have reliable power yet.
 
Last edited:

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,833
Reaction score
6,594
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
Wow! Thanks for that. I hadn't heard a thing about it and I get my news from multiple sources.

The thread title has been changed.
 
Last edited:

Magdalen

Petulantly Penitent
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
6,372
Reaction score
1,566
Location
Insignificant
Didn't see the Peace in Korea thread before posting - moved comment to that thread. Oops.
 
Last edited:

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,833
Reaction score
6,594
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
This probably falls under 'adds to the distraction' but the news media is so distracted this one didn't rate:

Trump appointing Dr. Oz to his sport, fitness and nutrition council

In case you aren't familiar, Dr Oz is an entertainer, not someone who knows shit about fitness and nutrition.
Oz is well-known as a host of an eponymous television show on health and medical issues and, before that, for appearances on "The Oprah Winfrey Show." But he has become a lightning rod for controversy for featuring what critics say is unscientific advice on his show.

In 2014, a congressional panel questioned Oz over his promotion of weight-loss products on his television show.
"The scientific community is almost monolithic against you in terms of the efficacy of the three products you called 'miracles,'" Sen. Claire McCaskill, a Missouri Democrat, said during the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation subcommittee hearing.

The following year, a group of doctors criticized him harshly, saying he manifested "an egregious lack of integrity" in his TV and promotional work and called his faculty position at Columbia University unacceptable.

The White House also announced on Friday that Trump will appoint former bodybuilder Lou Ferrigno, famous for playing the Hulk in the television show "The Incredible Hulk" in the 1970s and '80s, and New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick to the council for two-year terms.

I've run out of superlatives to describe this insanity.

As for keeping with the forum's purpose, people not familiar with Dr Oz may very well have an erroneous perception that he merely popularizes actual medical advice. No, he's a quack with a medical degree that defrauds people for a profit just like Trump does.

Let your reps know, consider this is an important issue even though it's on the back burner today.
 

Larry M

Banned
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
1,057
Reaction score
331
Location
Texas
Website
www.amazon.com
This meme has made the rounds online for over a year - the 'If you don't know' meme.

It is proudly displayed by conservatives, who don't know that they don't know what it really means.

I wrote a blog piece about this, which you can read if you care to.

Anyone with knowledge of the history of our political parties and the Civil War era knows the fatal flaw in this meme.

Yet they continue to post it as their "proof" that Democrats are bad and Republicans are good.

Like the guy in the thread, they also nearly always (in my experience) refuse to listen to or read the explanation.
 

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,833
Reaction score
6,594
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
Attacking the Parkland students calling them crisis actors is a growing tin-foil-hat phenomena and it's dangerous. I don't know if more exposure that they are a problem, or ignoring them, hoping they stay fringe and go away is better. But for these students and the Sandy Hook parents it's no joke.

WA Po: People think she’s a Parkland ‘crisis actor.’ It’s terrifying.

This poor woman isn't even a Parkland student, she just has the same name. They've doxxed her and they are showing up where she works. She tracked one guy down who had called her workplace:
@911NoPlaner says his name is Ryan Rodrigues.

He’s 34, lives in the East Village and won’t say what he does for a living.

“My hobby is — I’m a false-flag researcher,” he told The Post, which reached him through an Instagram message.

A false flag, as Rodrigues explains it, is a government-staged hoax. He believes the shootings in Parkland, Orlando and Las Vegas were all “false flags,” faked or inflated by the media to help the “deep state” take away people’s guns.

The Sandy Hook parents are suing Alex Jones. That deserves our support.
The torment caused by these conspiracy theories is at the heart of a lawsuit filed last month by three parents whose children died in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. They’re suing right-wing YouTube star Alex Jones, who had suggested the rampage was a hoax that the families had helped perpetuate. The parents said they have suffered “severe degree of mental stress and anguish,” according to the lawsuit, and a “high degree of psychological pain.”


I'm not sure if stalking laws are adequate to cover this. First Amendment or not there needs to be inciting charges for people like Jones who make money off egging these people on (like the Clinton pizza parlor child sex trafficking nonsense that resulted in a idiot taking a gun and showing up there).

It might be tricky to tweak stalking and inciting violence laws to fit this new phenomena, but it does need to be addressed.
 

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,833
Reaction score
6,594
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
NYT: For-profit college fraud investigations scaled back under Betsy DeVos
An investigation into DeVry University, now known as Adtalem Global Education, "ground to a halt early last year," and later, over the summer, DeVos picked Julian Schmoke, a former dean at the school, to be the team's supervisor, the Times reported.
Meanwhile, probes into for-profit education companies Bridgepoint Education and Career Education Corp. also "went dark," the newspaper said. The Times reported that former employees of those institutions are working for DeVos as well, including Robert S. Eitel, a former Bridgepoint attorney who is now her senior counselor, and Diane Auer Jones, a former Career Education employee who is now a senior postsecondary education adviser at the department. The department's recently confirmed general counsel, Carlos G. Muñiz, provided consulting services to Career Education, the newspaper said.
Taking the cue from how Trump staffed departments like the EPA, DeVos has hired the people previously thought to be conning students, charging high tuition paid for with loans, by false claims of employment prospects after graduation that weren't forthcoming.
 

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,833
Reaction score
6,594
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
Looks like states can take action against the dishonest private universities.

They're going to have to take action in this case too, given Pruitt of the EPA is simply on the side of Monsanto and other polluting corporations:

Politico: White House, EPA headed off chemical pollution study.
Scott Pruitt’s EPA and the White House sought to block publication of a federal health study on a nationwide water-contamination crisis, after one Trump administration aide warned it would cause a "public relations nightmare," newly disclosed emails reveal.

The intervention early this year — not previously disclosed — came as HHS' Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry was preparing to publish its assessment of a class of toxic chemicals that has contaminated water supplies near military bases, chemical plants and other sites from New York to Michigan to West Virginia.

The study would show that the chemicals endanger human health at a far lower level than EPA has previously called safe, according to the emails
....

The emails portray a “brazenly political” response to the contamination crisis, said Judith Enck, a former EPA official who dealt with the same pollutants during the Obama administration — saying it goes far beyond a normal debate among scientists....

In his year leading EPA, he has overhauled several scientific advisory panels to include more industry representatives and recently ordered limits on the kinds of scientific studies the agency will consider on the health effects of pollution.

On the other hand, Pruitt has also called water pollution one of his signature priorities.
"War is peace."


It's always only about the money:
The chemicals at issue in the HHS study have long been used in products like Teflon and firefighting foam, and are contaminating water systems around the country. Known as PFOA and PFOS, they have been linked with thyroid defects, problems in pregnancy and certain cancers, even at low levels of exposure.

The problem has already proven to be enormously costly for chemicals manufacturers. The 3M Co., which used them to make Scotchguard, paid more than $1.5 billion to settle lawsuits related to water contamination and personal injury claims....

But some of the biggest liabilities reside with the Defense Department, which used foam containing the chemicals in exercises at bases across the country. In a March report to Congress, the Defense Department listed 126 facilities where tests of nearby water supplies showed the substances exceeded the current safety guidelines.

A government study concluding that the chemicals are more dangerous than previously thought could dramatically increase the cost of cleanups at sites like military bases and chemical manufacturing plants, and force neighboring communities to pour money into treating their drinking water supplies....

Herz, the OMB staffer, forwarded the email warning about the study's "extremely painful" consequences to EPA’s top financial officer on Jan. 30. Later that day, Nancy Beck, deputy assistant administrator for EPA's Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, suggested elevating the study to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs to coordinate an interagency review. Beck, who worked as a toxicologist in that office for 10 years, suggested it would be a "good neutral arbiter" of the dispute.


Merchants of Doubt:
Yogin Kothari, a lobbyist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, called Beck's January email "extremely troubling because it appears as though the White House is trying to interfere in a science-based risk assessment."

Environmentalists say such interference was routine during the Bush administration.

"It’s why the Obama administration issued a call for scientific integrity policies across the federal government," Kothari said in an email to POLITICO. "Dr. Beck should know firsthand that the Bush administration sidelined science at every turn, given that she spent time at OMB during that time." ...

EPA scientists, including career staffers, were already talking with the HHS researchers about the differences in their two approaches to evaluating the chemicals when officials at the White House raised alarm in late January, the emails show. Those differences, according to the correspondence, stemmed from the agencies’ use of different scientific studies as a basis, and from taking different approaches to accounting for the harm that the chemicals can do to the immune system — an area of research that has burgeoned in the two years since EPA issued its health advisory.

Enck, the former EPA official, said she sees one troubling gap in the emails: They make “no mention of the people who are exposed to PFOA or PFOS, there’s no health concern expressed here.”
"Different scientific studies", "the experts don't agree": that is the tactic used by global climate change deniers and it was used in the past to deny cigarettes caused cancer and to deny the dangers of second hand smoke.
 
Last edited:

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,833
Reaction score
6,594
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
This has become more public than not so we may need a separate thread: It has come out in the WA Po that Trump tried to pressure the Postmaster General to double Amazon charges. Trump's vendetta against Jeff Bezos for negative coverage in the WA Po is not so thinly disguised.

Turns out using government agencies to punish one's enemies was one of the impeachment charges against Nixon.

Article 2 of the Nixon Watergate Impeachment
Using the powers of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens, impairing the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, or contravening the laws governing agencies of the executive branch and the purposed of these agencies.

This conduct has included one or more of the following:

He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, endeavoured to obtain from the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, confidential information contained in income tax returns for purposed not authorized by law, and to cause, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, income tax audits or other income tax investigations to be intitiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner.

He misused the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service, and other executive personnel, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, by directing or authorizing such agencies or personnel to conduct or continue electronic surveillance or other investigations for purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or any other lawful function of his office; he did direct, authorize, or permit the use of information obtained thereby for purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or any other lawful function of his office; and he did direct the concealment of certain records made by the Federal Bureau of Investigation of electronic surveillance.

He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, authorized and permitted to be maintained a secret investigative unit within the office of the President, financed in part with money derived from campaign contributions, which unlawfully utilized the resources of the Central Intelligence Agency, engaged in covert and unlawful activities, and attempted to prejudice the constitutional right of an accused to a fair trial.

He has failed to take care that the laws were faithfully executed by failing to act when he knew or had reason to know that his close subordinates endeavoured to impede and frustrate lawful inquiries by duly constituted executive, judicial and legislative entities concerning the unlawful entry into the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee, and the cover-up thereof, and concerning other unlawful activities including those relating to the confirmation of Richard Kleindienst as Attorney General of the United States, the electronic surveillance of private citizens, the break-in into the offices of Dr. Lewis Fielding, and the campaign financing practices of the Committee to Re-elect the President.

In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Criminal Division, and the Office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, of the Department of Justice, and the Central Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.
One of Nixon's targets (on his enemies list) was the LA Times. Maddow tonight played an excerpt from the Nixon tapes of him ordering harassment of all the upper level staff at the LA times.

It is worth sharing to others that this was an impeachable offense in the Watergate hearings. When you hear about the egregious act of Trump trying to screw Bezos, mention to people Nixon was charged for similar offenses.
 
Last edited:

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,833
Reaction score
6,594
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
I could have put this under the Peace in Korea thread since it is a threat to that peace, but the problem is wider than that.

John Bolton has hired as his chief of staff, Fred Fleitz who believes 80% of the Muslims in the US are plotting to take over and force Islam on everyone.

Apparently Flynn was like minded, McMaster wasn't and now Trump picks the worst from the loony bin to reform the NSC in Hitler's image, seriously, just replace Jew with Muslim.

MSNBC: Bolton changes the National Security Council, but not for the better
When Donald Trump named Michael Flynn as the White House National Security Advisor, Flynn took the opportunity to bring a curious cast of characters with him to the National Security Council. After Flynn was ousted, it took a while for his successor, H.R. McMaster, to assemble a more capable and qualified team.

The trouble is, the president soon grew tired of McMaster. In March, Trump showed him the door and brought on John Bolton, who quickly took steps of his own to bring the National Security Council in line with his hawkish, right-wing vision.

Take this week, for example.

White House national security adviser John Bolton tapped controversial longtime security analyst Fred Fleitz Tuesday to serve as the National Security Council's executive secretary and chief of staff.

How all these radicals held national security jobs for years is concerning in itself. Both Bolton and Fleitz have had positions in national security for years despite holding such radical beliefs.
Fleitz clashed with officials in pursuit of bogus intelligence claims; he's been a prominent anti-Muslim voice; and he published a book endorsing an aggressive posture toward North Korea....

Or particular interest is Fleitz's former leadership role at an Islamophobic think tank run by Frank Gaffney, a right-wing activist and conspiracy theorist. For years, Gaffney was widely seen as a fringe crackpot, which mainstream officials kept at arms' length, but in the Trump era, that's changing.
This is some scary stuff. They both want to bomb Iran. And they both believe apparently:
Both Mr. Pompeo and Mr. Bolton have appeared frequently on the radio show of Frank Gaffney Jr., the president and founder of the Center for Security Policy, a think tank that argues that mosques and Muslims across America are engaged in a "stealth jihad" to "Islamize" the country by taking advantage of American pluralism and democracy.

Democracy Now: John Bolton Names Professional Islamophobe & Bush Official Fred Fleitz to National Security Staff There are some audio clips of Fleitz spewing his beliefs. You can stream the newscast, the transcripts are pending.

I can't believe these people are running the country.
 

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,833
Reaction score
6,594
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
Safety Concerns Grow as Inmates Are Guarded by Teachers and Secretaries
The staffing scramble at Big Spring is playing out at federal prisons across the country. As the Trump administration has curtailed hiring in its quest to reduce the size of the government, some prisons are so pressed for guards that they regularly compel teachers, nurses, secretaries and other support staff to step in.

It was not uncommon in the past for prisons to occasionally call upon support workers as substitute guards, especially in emergencies. The practice, which leaves other prison functions short-handed, came under criticism during the Obama administration, which moved in its final year to cut back.

But as the shortage of correctional officers has grown chronic under President Trump — and the practice of drawing upon other workers has become routine — many prisons have been operating in a perpetual state of staffing turmoil, leaving some workers feeling ill-equipped and unsafe on the job, according to interviews and internal documents from the Bureau of Prisons....

...Dozens of workers from prisons across the country said inmates had become more brazen with staff members and more violent with one another. At a prison in West Virginia, violent incidents increased almost 15 percent in 2017 from the year before, according to data obtained by The New York Times. Workers blame the problems on their depleted numbers and the need to push often inexperienced staff members into front-line correctional roles, changes not lost on the prison population.

“When you’re an officer and in the units for eight hours a day, you get to know the inmates,” said a teacher at a Florida prison who was not authorized to speak to the news media. “You can tell when a fight is about to happen. I don’t have that background.” The teacher added: “The inmates see this and they know we are outnumbered. They know we have people working in the units who don’t have the slightest idea what to do.”

Support staff members typically receive only a few weeks’ training in correctional work and, while required under their contracts to serve as substitutes, are often uncomfortable in the roles. Even workers who previously held correctional positions said the cutbacks were unsettling because fewer colleagues were on hand to provide backup when things turned ugly.

This is yet another pending crisis resulting from the myth that taxes are nothing but redistribution of money from the hard working rich to the lazy poor. When framing issues about taxes, consider that taxes are what we pay toward community services. Welfare is one of the smallest fractions of where tax dollars go.
 

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,833
Reaction score
6,594
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
This one is so bad, I may need to start a thread on it.

Thread by @Laurie_Garrett: "Stop whatever you're doing and read the @WhiteHouse plan for complete reorganization of the entire federal government. I have tweeted some h […]" #Trump #MAGA
Stop whatever you're doing and read the @WhiteHouse plan for complete reorganization of the entire federal government. I have tweeted some highlights, but honestly can't begin to capture the horror.
Overall, it privatizes a lot, cuts, & consolidates power.
whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…

Under the Plan, the govt sells off the US Postal Service, FAA, eliminates more than a 1/3rd of the US Public Health Corps, restructures all foreign aid & development programs, and places every single domestic program for poor families & children under a single welfare authority.

The Plan also offers a real estate bonanza for developers, selling off federal properties en masse. And it cuts or restructures all the fedl progs that are meant to educate people about their financial rights & protect them from bank & mortgage fraud.

The #Trump plan cuts R&D @NASA and all forms of alternative energy development are consolidated under a single DOE agency. A Dept of Welfare is created, and all forms of support for health of America's poor leave @HHS & go to new Welfare authority.

The Plan facilitates "streamlined" privatization of federal assets via a Customer Experience (CX) Improvement Capability. It transfers all background/conflicts checks on fedl appointees and employees AWAY from @FBI and into the Dept. of Defense.
whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…

Net impact of the #Trump govt reorg scheme is taking everything across govt that is for poor & needy people and consolidate it under single budgetary authority, cut science all over the place, eliminate the Census Bureau, reduce regulation &, as this closing shot shows, #MAGA .

Delivering Government Solutions in the 21st Century
Reform Plan and Reorganization Recommendations


Some corporate investments in lobbying are geared to profit from selling off of government services like the post office. The lions have been drooling to get their hands on the USPO for years.
15. Devolution of Activities from the Federal Government
a) Sell the transmission assets owned and
operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority
and the Power Marketing Administrations
within DOE, including those of Southwestern
Power Administration, Western Area Power
Administration, and Bonneville Power Administration,
to encourage a more efficient allocation
of economic resources and mitigate unnecessary
risk to taxpayers.

b) Restructure the U.S. Postal System to return
it to a sustainable business model or prepare
it for future conversion from a Government
agency into a privately-held corporation.
The President’s Task Force on the United States
Postal System will make recommendations on
reforms towards this goal in August 2018.

c) Reorganize DOT to better align the agency’s
core missions and programmatic responsibilities,
reduce transportation program
fragmentation across the Government, and
improve outcomes. Changes would include
spinning off Federal responsibility for operating
air traffic control services, integrating into DOT
certain coastal and inland waterways commercial
navigation activities and transportation security
programs, and reassessing the structure and
responsibilities of DOT’s Office of the Secretary.

All the consolidation looks good on paper when only one side with no rebuttal is described. But underlying the consolidation is a plan to gut the regulations these agencies manage.

Public health spending has already been gutted. Here is a plan to further cut this important service:
18. Transform the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned
Corps into a leaner and more efficient
organization that is better prepared to respond
to public health emergencies and provide vital
health services, including by reducing the size
of the Corps and building up a Reserve Corps for
response in public health emergencies.

There is a lot here which amounts to cutting all social services. The Paul Ryan faction of the GOP has had the goal of privatizing Social Security for decades. It's their wet dream. Clearly that is one of the goals here disguised in language framing it as streamlining, increasing efficiency, blah blah blah. It's renaming downsizing and calling it right-sizing.

You can bet the Mercers and the Kochs had a heavy hand in this document.
 

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,833
Reaction score
6,594
Location
Ralph's side of the island.

Brightdreamer

Just Another Lazy Perfectionist
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
13,074
Reaction score
4,674
Location
USA
Website
brightdreamersbookreviews.blogspot.com
This is reassuring but all the more reason to get Democrats into the Congress in Nov:

Sweeping Trump proposal seeks to shrink government, merge agencies
But we shouldn't lose sight of the fact there are a fair number of right wing legislators that are pushing for these goals.

I'm not about to take anything for granted about this regime...

The November election is going to be an indicator of a lot of things.

Which is why we need to get people out to vote (forget the red caps - we need to go for the blues and the ones who sat home in 2016), making sure people get registered and stay on the books and know what to do if they're challenged at the polling place.

And we need to watch like a hypercaffeinated hawk to ensure that the November elections happen without fingers on scales... or happen at all, if the regime panics and decides to manufacture a crisis.
 

lizmonster

Possibly A Mermaid Queen
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
14,747
Reaction score
24,793
Location
Massachusetts
Website
elizabethbonesteel.com
Which is why we need to get people out to vote (forget the red caps - we need to go for the blues and the ones who sat home in 2016), making sure people get registered and stay on the books and know what to do if they're challenged at the polling place.

We need the younger voters. 18-29s lean heavily liberal, but their turnout is always significantly lower. Not sure what can be done there that hasn't already been tried.
 

Alpha Echo

I should be writing.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
9,615
Reaction score
1,852
Location
East Coast
We need the younger voters. 18-29s lean heavily liberal, but their turnout is always significantly lower. Not sure what can be done there that hasn't already been tried.

So true. I just read an article, I'll have to try to find it...Found it.

Generation Pickleball: Welcome to Florida's Political Tomorrowland

Trump supporters who get the most media attention tend to be economically anxious laborers in economically depressed factory towns. But in Florida, economically secure retirement meccas like The Villages are the real reason Trump won in 2016—and why the state’s Republicans, who have controlled Tallahassee for two decades, think they can avoid a blue wave in 2018 and help reelect Trump in 2020. For all the hype about Puerto Ricans moving to the Sunshine State after Hurricane Maria, or high school students like the Parkland gun control activists turning 18 and registering to vote, any Democratic surge could be offset by the migration of Republican-leaning seniors who like Florida’s balmy weather and lack of income tax. If midterm elections typically play out as judgments on the presidency, then Florida’s upcoming contests will be a race between the usual laws of political gravity and the state’s demographic destiny: Trump remains unpopular with younger voters, and Democrats have already flipped four Florida legislative seats in low-profile special elections this year, but the older voters who are most likely to vote in the midterms are increasingly likely to move to Florida and support the president.
 

lizmonster

Possibly A Mermaid Queen
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
14,747
Reaction score
24,793
Location
Massachusetts
Website
elizabethbonesteel.com
I have just come back from Twitter and the latest SCOTUS rulings.

I am sick.

I want to be hopeful, but FFS, how do we do that?
 

Brightdreamer

Just Another Lazy Perfectionist
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
13,074
Reaction score
4,674
Location
USA
Website
brightdreamersbookreviews.blogspot.com
I have just come back from Twitter and the latest SCOTUS rulings.

I am sick.

I want to be hopeful, but FFS, how do we do that?

Tell me about it.

I feel like I'm stuck at a poker game where the dealer just showed their hand: five aces, in a deck that's supposed to have four. And they're smiling and laughing because the game is rigged, always has been, but they're the dealer and I'm not so fuck you.

And I look around the casino, all the other tables: the Russia table, the Venezuela table, the Turkey table...

And I know that will be us. Not might be. Not possibly be. Not "but one more election..." be.

Barring actual revolution, that will be us. It might already be us.
 

MaeZe

Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 6, 2016
Messages
12,833
Reaction score
6,594
Location
Ralph's side of the island.
I NEED TO ADD, THIS ISN'T ABOUT ABORTION AND THERE'S NO REASON TO DISCUSS THAT HERE, IT WILL GET THE THREAD CLOSED.

THIS IS ABOUT SCOTUS OVERTURNING A STATE LAW WHICH WAS INTENDED TO ADRESS FAUX CLINICS (there is no medical care in these 'clinics') INTENDED TO MISLEAD PEOPLE.

Another slipped under the radar story:

SCOTUS decision today to allow pro-life clinics to masquerade as medical clinics and not tell their patients their real goal is to prevent abortions.
In a 5-4 vote, the Court reversed and remanded, holding that the pro-life pregnancy center petitioners were likely to succeed on their claim that the California Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act (the “FACT Act” or the “Act”) violated the First Amendment.

In an opinion authored by Justice Thomas, the Court began its discussion by explaining that the licensed notice was a content-based regulation that likely violated the First Amendment. The court rejected the Ninth Circuit’s characterization of the licensed notice as regulating professional speech, stating that the Court had never recognized “professional speech” as a separate category of speech that was subject to different free speech rules. The Court explained that it had only granted lesser protection to professional speech in two situations--where professionals were required to disclose “factual, noncontroversial information in their ‘commercial speech,’’’ and where states regulated professional conduct that incidentally implicated speech--and that neither of those lines of authority were applicable in the instant case. The Court further stated that it had a long history of protecting the First Amendment rights of professionals outside of those two contexts, emphasizing that imposing content-based regulations on professional speech created a risk of the government seeking to suppress unpopular ideas rather than advance legitimate regulatory objectives. The Court also concluded that the licensed notice did not survive even intermediate scrutiny, as it was “wildly underinclusive” in light of the Act’s stated purpose of providing low income women with information about the state-sponsored health services at issue.

The Court also held that the unlicensed notice unduly burdened protected speech.
The "unlicensed notice" was a state law requiring they post the fact they have no licensed medical providers. It unduly burdens free speech to force a clinic to let patients know they weren't a licensed medical clinic.

Also I need to clarify In addition the law required the clinic post a notice where low cost pregnancy medical care was available. That is an important issue I didn't mean to leave out.
 
Last edited: