• Basic Writing questions is not a crit forum. All crits belong in Share Your Work

Another overused word thread: one, head, and back

blackcat777

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 6, 2017
Messages
415
Reaction score
78
Seeing other threads about popularly overused words, I found some tools to analyze my ms and was surprised by the results. No issues with looks/nods/smiles/shrugs/eyes/that/like... My three most abused words are one (by a huge margin), head, and back.

I'm not sure how this happened. I have three MCs, and word abuse order is MC1, MC2, one, MC3, hand (*but this is intentional), head, back. And then there is a huge nosedive in the frequency of words that occur after these. I'm not sure what everyone is doing with their heads, because I don't have a preponderance of nods or shakes, but it has to be something related to tagging. Back is likely a mix of tagging and directional overuse.

But one? Has anyone else ever abused the word one? I'm going to take the liberty to scratch my head over this (since I apparently don't overdo that in my ms).
 

BethS

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 21, 2005
Messages
11,708
Reaction score
1,763
I guess you'll have to look at the individual occurrences of the word and see what you're doing with it. Also, is it possible that the results are including the letters "o n e" found inside other words?
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,768
Reaction score
4,663
Location
Scotland
Good point, Beth. I think you may have nailed the problem.

I just used 'Find' in Word and entered 'one' with no conditions - came back with over 500 and it included words like done and someone.

You don't say what tool you used, blackcat777, but you may be advised to use a different tool, or try it again for 'one', but in either case check the settings first to see if you can limit the searching to the frequency use of complete words only.
 
Last edited:

morngnstar

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
2,271
Reaction score
297
If one heads there and back a lot, one could overuse those words. Otherwise I'm baffled.

Assuming you aren't using the formal "one" for generalizations, maybe you could be overusing "one of". "One of the Xes" could be replaced with "an X".
 
Last edited:

Maggie Maxwell

Making Einstein cry since 1994
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
11,733
Reaction score
10,523
Location
In my head
Website
thewanderingquille.blogspot.com
"Back" is definitely one of mine. One of my WIPs, I had more instances of "back" than I had pages. Lots of looking back and turning back and touching someone's back. I also overuse "That". Those are the only two words I have on my general editing notes to look for due to overuse. I'm sure that list will grow as I get into more edits.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
Easy substitutes exist for all of those words, and rephrasing sentences may help, too. The fact that you have noticed excessive use is a good thing.

caw
 

blackcat777

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 6, 2017
Messages
415
Reaction score
78
I did some digging in regards to the overuse of one. Someone, anyone, etc. were included, so searching for direct matches cut the use by 1/3.

One thing (HA) I'm experimenting with is an extremely minimalist approach to naming tertiary characters. If I have a group of nameless tertiaries (e.g., in a fight), one pops up a lot. And I absolutely could find more clever ways to structure some of these sentences.
 

indianroads

Wherever I go, there I am.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
2,372
Reaction score
230
Location
Colorado
Website
indianroads.net
Tangent question: (sorry)

When I first started using a computer to write, I used an editor called "VI" (Visual editor) - it's a UNIX thing, and unless you're an old fart such as I, you've probably never heard of it. VI has no spelling check, or grammar, or any of that stuff - and formatting was done with NROFF or TROFF (never mind that) - it was primitive. But one thing I could do in the UNIX environment was easily search for frequency of word usage. It was an external process where you push the VI file into different utilities, to separate each word into a single line, sort it, then do a unique word count (which would give you the number by each word), then then strip out redundancies via a streaming editor. What you would get is a list of words with a number beside it indicating how many times it was used. Sounds confusing, but I could actually do this via a single command.

Now I'm using MS Word (10) and would love to have the same functionality as I had back then. I don't know my way around Word all that well, so I'm probably missing some great feature that would do this for me. Is there a way to do this?

What I currently do is search for words that I suspect might be overused via the 'Find' feature. To me, this is a pretty klutzy method.
 
Last edited:

Enlightened

Always Learning
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 5, 2018
Messages
4,863
Reaction score
167
Location
Colorado
You can try this for frequency counter.... https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us...e/1fdf92c2-615e-49a2-8f12-43e48b031fb3?auth=1

Word underlines grammar problems in green squiggly line. If you have redundancies, such as "that that" put together, it tells you automatically with these error messages. Red squiggles are spelling errors.

Word is not error free. If you meant to type the word public, but you typed pubic, it won't warn you. For an easy count feature, in Word, try clicking the square (bottom right of Word window) that reads Words: #. It gives character counts, how many paragraphs, lines, pages, and words (for the entire document, or for a highlighted portion of text).

An easy way to use find, in Word, is Ctrl+F.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
Word is not error free. If you meant to type the word public, but you typed pubic, it won't warn you.

Not exactly. It won't catch it as a spelling error, but might catch it as a grammar error, depending on context. Which is the best argument for NOT turning off the grammar checker. Easily mistyped things like there for their and it's for its nearly always get nailed by the grammar checker.

caw
 

BethS

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 21, 2005
Messages
11,708
Reaction score
1,763
What I currently do is search for words that I suspect might be overused via the 'Find' feature. To me, this is a pretty klutzy method.

If you use the Replace function when you open the Find window, and choose to replace the word in the search box with the exact same word, it will tell you how many replacements it made.

There may be another way to do it, but that's the only one I'm familiar with.
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,768
Reaction score
4,663
Location
Scotland
'Replace' in a colour (I use red) and the changes stand out.
 

Enlightened

Always Learning
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 5, 2018
Messages
4,863
Reaction score
167
Location
Colorado
Not exactly. It won't catch it as a spelling error, but might catch it as a grammar error, depending on context. Which is the best argument for NOT turning off the grammar checker. Easily mistyped things like there for their and it's for its nearly always get nailed by the grammar checker.

caw

But and might.... Right, not error free. :)
 

vhilal

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Messages
65
Reaction score
7
Great thread. Something I know I need to work on, so I really appreciate the tips :)
 

P.K. Torrens

Saving up for a typewriter
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 15, 2017
Messages
513
Reaction score
313
Location
Auckland, NZ
Scrivener is awesome for this.

It has a lot of bells and whistles but one of the handy features is "project statistics."

It will give you a count of the number of times you use a word.

I could go on and on about the program but it is generally polarising - people love it or hate it.

They have a 30-day free trial so you can see if it works for you :)