Parallelism?

evangaline

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
188
Reaction score
11
I have a question about this sentence: He didn’t dare move, not to wipe the beads of sweat at his hairline or to dry his clammy palms on his jeans.
Do I need the second 'to' (or to dry his clammy palms) to maintain parallel structure?
Thanks, everyone!
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,768
Reaction score
4,663
Location
Scotland
One more option -

He daren't move, neither to wipe the beads of sweat at his hairline nor to dry his clammy palms on his jeans.
 

evangaline

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
188
Reaction score
11
Blackbird, quick question. I read that when you have a negative sentence with ‘not’ instead of ‘neither’ use ‘or’ in the second part of the sentence. Is that not correct?
Thanks, Bufty for the alternative!
 
Last edited:

emlm21

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
66
Reaction score
12
Location
Chicago
I like "He didn’t dare move, neither to wipe the beads of sweat at his hairline nor to dry his clammy palms on his jeans."

I think both "or/nor" can be used with "not" depending on the sentence and how you want it to sound. To me, "nor" gives it more emphasis.
 

BethS

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 21, 2005
Messages
11,708
Reaction score
1,763
I have a question about this sentence: He didn’t dare move, not to wipe the beads of sweat at his hairline or to dry his clammy palms on his jeans.
Do I need the second 'to' (or to dry his clammy palms) to maintain parallel structure?
Thanks, everyone!

"He dared not move" sounds better, at least to my ear. Not sure I agree about "or" becoming "nor." If you'd written "neither to...", then yes. But otherwise, maybe not.

Anyway, that doesn't answer your question. Yes, IMO, you need to retain "to" to give that satisfying sound of parallelism.
 
Last edited:

Zanralotta

Registered
Joined
Apr 27, 2010
Messages
19
Reaction score
8
He didn’t dare move, not to wipe the beads of sweat at his hairline or to dry his clammy palms on his jeans.
Different suggestion that emphazises the parallelism a bit more,

He didn't dare move, not to wipe the beads of sweat at his hairline, not to dry his clammy palms on his jeans.

Eliminates the or/nor question as a bonus :D
 

Night_Writer

It's all symbolic.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
86
Location
The New World
Here's another option:

He didn’t dare move, either to wipe the beads of sweat at his hairline or to dry his clammy palms on his jeans.

And I would leave the second 'to.'
 

Emily Patrice

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 25, 2018
Messages
86
Reaction score
11
The structure is parallel whether or not you have that second "to".

He didn’t dare move, not:
- to wipe the beads of sweat at his hairline or
- to dry his clammy palms on his jeans.

He didn’t dare move, not to:
- wipe the beads of sweat at his hairline or
- dry his clammy palms on his jeans.

I prefer the second option, but I seem to be in a minority.
 

Chris P

Likes metaphors mixed, not stirred
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
22,668
Reaction score
7,356
Location
Wash., D.C. area
My inclination is to retain the second "to" not so much out of parallelism but because the infinitive form of the verb fits there. That said, readers sometimes say my obedience to rules makes my writing too dry.