Are the guidelines for paragraph breaks solidly defined? (also, internal dialog & paragraph breaks)
In my revision process sometimes I break the paragraphs differently, and it changes the reading of a passage. This is similar in my experience to how commas can change the rhythm of a sentence, and (at least in my experience) place the emphasis somewhere new.
I'm breaking paragraphs by feel at the moment. I know that each paragraph is a new 'idea' and that we learn in school that the first sentence defines the intent of the paragraph. But I am finding that it reads 'right'' to break the paragraphs up in new ways - Is this necessarily wrong? Let's say (hypothetically) that I gave a long passage to ten editors with no paragraph breaks, but it needed breaks, would they all create the same breaks?
Are the rules set in stone? Firm clay? Mud?
My instincts are telling me that paragraph breaks can serve as a device to create emphasis where you want to place it. Like, the lone sentence can be very impactful, compared to tucking it in the middle of a paragraph. (I was taught that paragraphs require more than one sentence, FWIW.)
Secondly:
Also about paragraphs. (or, carriage returns.) How does (italicized) internal dialogue impact CRs? Is it treated just like spoken dialogue?
Thirdly:
What if there is a lot of action/narration (three sentences, say) and then a thought - response by a character. (Or spoken response). Does the presence of so much action (three sentences) mean that the response gets its own carriage return?
Please let me know if my questions are unclear. I am hearing varying ideas on whether a thought by a character (e.g. Oh no!) in the middle of a paragraph of narration should be offset with CRs.
In my revision process sometimes I break the paragraphs differently, and it changes the reading of a passage. This is similar in my experience to how commas can change the rhythm of a sentence, and (at least in my experience) place the emphasis somewhere new.
I'm breaking paragraphs by feel at the moment. I know that each paragraph is a new 'idea' and that we learn in school that the first sentence defines the intent of the paragraph. But I am finding that it reads 'right'' to break the paragraphs up in new ways - Is this necessarily wrong? Let's say (hypothetically) that I gave a long passage to ten editors with no paragraph breaks, but it needed breaks, would they all create the same breaks?
Are the rules set in stone? Firm clay? Mud?
My instincts are telling me that paragraph breaks can serve as a device to create emphasis where you want to place it. Like, the lone sentence can be very impactful, compared to tucking it in the middle of a paragraph. (I was taught that paragraphs require more than one sentence, FWIW.)
Secondly:
Also about paragraphs. (or, carriage returns.) How does (italicized) internal dialogue impact CRs? Is it treated just like spoken dialogue?
Thirdly:
What if there is a lot of action/narration (three sentences, say) and then a thought - response by a character. (Or spoken response). Does the presence of so much action (three sentences) mean that the response gets its own carriage return?
Please let me know if my questions are unclear. I am hearing varying ideas on whether a thought by a character (e.g. Oh no!) in the middle of a paragraph of narration should be offset with CRs.
Last edited: