First Shoe

ElaineA

All about that action, boss.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
8,582
Reaction score
8,522
Location
The Seattle suburbs
Website
www.reneedominick.com
...has Manafort's foot in it, along with a long-time business partner, Rick Gates.

I have to assume Manafort's going to take the Fifth, but I do find it intriguing the first charge is said to be money laundering, not collusion. (This is not yet confirmed.)

Personally, not feeling as giddy as many on Twitter, etc, since T has slithered out of pretty much every serious predicament he's ever faced. I do hold out hope about smearing Manafort all over Pence (Manafort's personal pick for VP). Getting him out of there first would make me giddy so we wouldn't have to sit in horror knowing he'd be next in line if they manage to lever T out of there.
 

Twick

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
3,291
Reaction score
715
Location
Canada
Apparently Fox News has been running the breaking story of - the debate about whether cheese should be put over or under the patty in a cheeseburger.
 

Kaiser-Kun

!
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 12, 2009
Messages
6,944
Reaction score
1,915
Age
39
Location
Mexico
Uh oh. Someone's getting antsy.


Apparently Fox News has been running the breaking story of - the debate about whether cheese should be put over or under the patty in a cheeseburger.

What kind of lameass debate is that? OVER!
 

nighttimer

No Gods No Masters
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
4,103
Location
CBUS
Apparently Fox News has been running the breaking story of - the debate about whether cheese should be put over or under the patty in a cheeseburger.

Fox News treats the news as something of an afterthought. Stories about whether you put the cheese and lettuce under or over a burger are very important. Fair and balanced!

George Papadopoulos guilty plea on false statements to FBI wrt meetings with Russia: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4163402/Papadopoulos-Statement-Offense.pdf

This is even bigger than Manafort.

Nah. Now that I know I've been wrong all these years putting the lettuce on top of the burger, I is ashamed.... :e2bummed:
 

Brightdreamer

Just Another Lazy Perfectionist
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
13,056
Reaction score
4,643
Location
USA
Website
brightdreamersbookreviews.blogspot.com
I can't believe this. I really just can't. How far have we fallen as a country, to come to this?

People put cheese *under* the patty?

(As for the other news... I'm waiting to see what other dominoes fall before getting in any way excited. Once bitten twice shy on the hope front...)
 

cbenoi1

Banned
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
5,038
Reaction score
977
Location
Canada
People put cheese *under* the patty?
When you come to think of it, having the cheese on top means the cook has to slide the cheese patty off his spatula with a finger. Just flipping the patty over the lower bun avoids that. It's BRILLIANT.

-cb
 

Chris P

Likes metaphors mixed, not stirred
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
22,668
Reaction score
7,356
Location
Wash., D.C. area
When you come to think of it, having the cheese on top means the cook has to slide the cheese patty off his spatula with a finger. Just flipping the patty over the lower bun avoids that. It's BRILLIANT.

-cb

Except the spatula will scrape off the cheese as it takes the patty off the griddle. Unless, of course, you put a cold cheese slice on the bun then put the patty on top, which an offence Mueller REALLY needs to indict.
 

Brightdreamer

Just Another Lazy Perfectionist
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
13,056
Reaction score
4,643
Location
USA
Website
brightdreamersbookreviews.blogspot.com
When you come to think of it, having the cheese on top means the cook has to slide the cheese patty off his spatula with a finger. Just flipping the patty over the lower bun avoids that. It's BRILLIANT.

-cb

Or one could put the cheese on top of the hot patty once it's off the spatula and on the lower half of the bun. (At least, that's what I do at home; cheese melts fine if the patty's hot.)
 

Gregg

Life is good
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
3,725
Reaction score
248
Age
77
Location
In my house on the river
I heard Manafort's bail was set at $10 million - and, apparently, he's looking at a long prison term for money laundering, tax evasion.............
But there is no mention of Trump/Russia/collusion in the indictment.
We'll have to wait and see if Manafort has some information relating to Trump/Russia/collusion to trade for a lighter sentence.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
I heard Manafort's bail was set at $10 million - and, apparently, he's looking at a long prison term for money laundering, tax evasion.............
But there is no mention of Trump/Russia/collusion in the indictment.
We'll have to wait and see if Manafort has some information relating to Trump/Russia/collusion to trade for a lighter sentence.

Every legal expert I saw interviewed on the news today said the same thing: This is a purely strategic move by Mueller to get Manafort's attention, and that it is likely there will be more charges, unless Manafort cuts some kind of deal to provide information. The latter, apparently, is just what Pappadopolous has already done, which was just revealed today.

The Trump claim that "there is no collusion", at this point, has the substance of morning fog at dawn. Even more pathetic is his continuing attempt to switch the attention to Hillary Clinton. Even if there is something to be investigated with Clinton, that doesn't change anything about what's being investigated with Trump. It's like Ted Bundy trying to get off by pointing the finger at John Gacy. And Mueller wasn't appointed to investigate Hillary Clinton. He was appointed to investigate the campaign activities of the President of the United States, who happens to be . . . ?

And as for "first shoe", this creature appears to be a centipede.

caw
 
Last edited:

James D. Macdonald

Your Genial Uncle
Absolute Sage
VPX
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
25,582
Reaction score
3,785
Location
New Hampshire
Website
madhousemanor.wordpress.com
Apparently Fox News has been running the breaking story of - the debate about whether cheese should be put over or under the patty in a cheeseburger.

This reminds me of the day when General Noriega was indicted for drug trafficking. In Panama City, La Prensa, the anti-government newspaper, didn't get printed that day. The Miami Herald appeared, with huge swatches of white space where entire stories had been deleted. But El Siglo, the pro-government newspaper, appeared with a splash headline ... about werewolves in Chilibre.
 

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,124
Reaction score
10,886
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
And as for "first shoe", this creature appears to be a centipede.

caw

Well said.

Apparently Fox News has been running the breaking story of - the debate about whether cheese should be put over or under the patty in a cheeseburger.

This is just so weird. Who has ever put the cheese and other condiments under the bun? I've never been in a restaurant where it was served that way. I've never even heard of this. As if America wasn't polarized enough over political issues. Now we'll be segregating our dinner guests over hamburger mechanics.
 

Maggie Maxwell

Making Einstein cry since 1994
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 21, 2013
Messages
11,736
Reaction score
10,533
Location
In my head
Website
thewanderingquille.blogspot.com
Well said.



This is just so weird. Who has ever put the cheese and other condiments under the bun? I've never been in a restaurant where it was served that way. I've never even heard of this. As if America wasn't polarized enough over political issues. Now we'll be segregating our dinner guests over hamburger mechanics.

Cheeseburgers are the new toilet paper roll: over or under?
 

rugcat

Lost in the Fog
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
16,339
Reaction score
4,110
Location
East O' The Sun & West O' The Moon
Website
www.jlevitt.com
It shouldn't have been a surprise to anyone that Paul Manafort was arrested. Even looking from the outside, it was abundantly clear that he was involved illegal lobbying, working for a foreign government against the interests of the United States without mentioning that a foreign government was paying him – not a legal way to operate.

Also, it was obvious he was involved in money laundering – the only question was whether it could be proven, and the Feds have some very good white collar crime investigators.

But as the WH quickly pointed out, those charges have nothing to do with collusion and there's no indication that Donald Trump was involved in any fashion. And I don't believe Muller's investigation will turn up any evidence of active collusion with the Russians – it's a hard thing to prove.

They may well find instances of inappropriate and problematic dealings with Russia by campaign officials, which may bring down several more people for lying to the FBI, but the hard legal evidence of active collusion will not be there.

Now, Manafort has been a crook for decades, and has known Donald Trump for decades as well. But just because you hang around with crooks doesn't mean you yourself are a crook, legally speaking. But I find it difficult to believe that Donald Trump was not involved in some of the same sort of shady and outright illegal transactions having to do with large sums of money.

And I think that's what Bob Muller is going to come up with – if he can get hold of Trumps tax returns, the information from them involving his financial transactions will eventually lead to some very bad consequences for the President.

Unless of course, he's fired first. I used to think Trump wouldn't be able to get away with that – that even the Republicans would see it as going too far and finally rise up against him. But now? I think the GOP faithful will rally around him and proclaim Muller went for beyond his mission and that Trump was absolutely right to fire him. They've decided to go all in with Trump, sink or swim.

But firing Mueller could have some bad political consequences – Trump's base will never desert him, but many independants who voted for him to shake things up might see congressional support for the firing as a bridge too far. And possibly that
would affect republicans in the House and Senate running for reelection, though that's very difficult to predict.
 
Last edited:

ElaineA

All about that action, boss.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
8,582
Reaction score
8,522
Location
The Seattle suburbs
Website
www.reneedominick.com
Dare I admit I put the cheese...inside the patty, mixed with the meat?

OK, not always. Don't disqualify me from Americanhood!

As to rugcat's post,

1) If Trump fires Mueller, the Senate can hire him right back, and we'll see how many R's want to hitch their careers to Trump's burning wagon. R's are already coming out saying Trump better keep hands off. Like with Nixon, those who protect him will go down with him.

2) The NY AG Schneiderman has jurisdiction to continue a lot of the investigation, since much of it happened in NY, and I'm pretty sure he will, if necessary.

3) This is the very tippy tip-top of the iceberg. These charges were filed because some of the events were bumping up against the statute of limitations. There are moving pieces all over the board.

4) According to several attorneys I heard speak today, collusion is not a legal term applicable to this situation, so they don't have to worry about "finding evidence of hard, active collusion." (And here's a good POLITICO debrief about it.) The legal issue is conspiracy, or attempt to commit conspiracy, and of that, it seems, there is plenty of smoke swirling. Whether provable before a jury (or Congress, in the case of the President), isn't yet clear.
 
Last edited:

Roxxsmom

Beastly Fido
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
23,124
Reaction score
10,886
Location
Where faults collide
Website
doggedlywriting.blogspot.com
Dare I admit I put the cheese...inside the patty, mixed with the meat?

OK, not always. Don't disqualify me from Americanhood!

You mean you mix chunks of cheese in with the hamburger meat when you're making the patties? I've seen that done. It's sort of the cheesy equivalent of mixing a package of Lipton French onion soup in with the meat for flavor.

Cheeseburgers are the new toilet paper roll: over or under?

Oh, dear. What about option C, leaving the roll propped up on the empty cardboard center of the last roll on the dispenser? What is the burgerly equivalent of that?
Now, Manafort has been a crook for decades, and has known Donald Trump for decades as well. But just because you hang around with crooks doesn't mean you yourself are a crook, legally speaking. But I find it difficult to believe that Donald Trump was not involved in some of the same sort of shady and outright illegal transactions having to do with large sums of money.


This, and the rest of your post, is pretty much what I've been thinking too. It's hard to say what could happen, but there could be a lot more coming out in the future. Whether they'll find a smoking gun that proves beyond reasonable doubt that Trump was complicit in all this? Hard to say at this point, but it's not impossible.

I'm also wondering if Trump might try pardoning someone who has dirt that could come out in his testimony. That seems like the sort of thing he'd do. Like you, though, I've all but given up hope that the Republicans in congress would cry foul on even something that blatant.

Hopefully it will make him look guilty as sin to every American who isn't a die-hard supporter, though.
 
Last edited: