So, when does one cross the line from "armed protester" to "domestic terrorist"?
I'm guessing that when one shoots innocent people (or blows then up) to induce terror--in service to some sort of radical ideology--one has has clearly crossed that line.
These turkeys are clearly engaged in illegal activity, however. Armed protesters, sure. Also, armed criminals.
I personally don't object to "domestic terrorist," given their clueless attempts to justify their stupidity. There's wiggle room to be sure. How about "armed insurrectionists"?
Whatever the label, however, they're still a dangerous crowd of dumbasses. I think an armed occupation of a Federal building is sufficient for a military-style response. Though I guess there's also sense in cutting them off completely and simply waiting them out.
The situation is getting media attention, but it would probably be better if it wasn't. Not much to do for that now.