Obama Changes Stance on Assad

???

  • statesmanship

    Votes: 3 27.3%
  • capitulation

    Votes: 6 54.5%
  • other

    Votes: 2 18.2%

  • Total voters
    11

William Haskins

poet
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
29,114
Reaction score
8,867
Age
58
Website
www.poisonpen.net
from wapo in october:

Finally, on Aug. 18, then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said, “The transition to democracy in Syria has begun and it’s time for Assad to get out of the way.” Obama simply issued a statement: “For the sake of the Syrian people,” he said, “the time has come for President Assad to step aside.”

The route Obama took to that declaration says a lot about where he is today. The president’s insistence that Assad must go has been his only true red line in the Syrian conflict. The red line he drew, and then withdrew, about repercussions of Syria’s use of chemical weapons didn’t happen for more than a year. But Obama’s determination to topple Assad remains one of the main points of friction between the United States and Russia in Syria.

from the AP today:

"The United States and our partners are not seeking so-called regime change," Kerry told reporters in the Russian capital after meeting President Vladimir Putin. A major international conference on Syria would take place later this week in New York, Kerry announced.

<snip>

President Barack Obama first called on Assad to leave power in the summer of 2011, with "Assad must go," being a consistent rallying cry. Later, American officials allowed that he wouldn't have to resign on "Day One" of a transition. Now, Assad's stay could be indefinite.
 
Last edited:

Don

All Living is Local
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
24,567
Reaction score
4,007
Location
Agorism FTW!
Hey, at least he's consistently evolving.
 

Cramp

Pain in the writing wrist
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 5, 2012
Messages
688
Reaction score
72
Location
UK
Looks to me like weary capitulation to the realities of global politics.

I'm not sure what is so "gotcha" about that.
 

William Haskins

poet
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
29,114
Reaction score
8,867
Age
58
Website
www.poisonpen.net
it's not really a "gotcha" for obama, who is running for nothing but his legacy, which has long been stained by ineffectual foreign policy.

it could be a "gotcha" for hillary clinton, who sang from the same hymn book and who should now have to answer as to her position, if the press will do its job.

it's really more of a "gotcha" for the 9 million syrians who have fled their homeland and cannot return without:


  • being gassed, jailed or tortured by a despot that the west assured them they were committed to helping depose,
  • being beheaded, enslaved or raped by the islamists who gained a foothold when it became obvious that the west was more interested in rhetoric than in assisting moderate rebels, or
  • being blown to bits by clinton's "reset" buddies and assad allies in russia for simply trying to determine their own future.

so yeah, i'd say there's a "gotcha" in there, but nothing as petty as you seem to be implying.
 

Cramp

Pain in the writing wrist
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 5, 2012
Messages
688
Reaction score
72
Location
UK
Yes, it sucks to be Syrian right now. The global community has a lot to answer for. As they probably do in Iraq and Afghanistan, and to the victims of Boko Haram and the many other parts of the world where we have fomented and allowed injustice and inhumanity to rule.
 

Myrealana

I aim to misbehave
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
5,425
Reaction score
1,911
Location
Denver, CO
Website
www.badfoodie.com
Looks to me like weary capitulation to the realities of global politics.

I'm not sure what is so "gotcha" about that.
You don't understand how it works. You have to take one position and stick to it forever regardless of any new factors or information, even if the previous position proved untenable or irresponsible, or just isn't working.

Only weakness and lily-livered liberal delusions make a person change a position over time or try new things. Don't you know that?
 

nighttimer

No Gods No Masters
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
4,103
Location
CBUS
Looks to me like weary capitulation to the realities of global politics.

I'm not sure what is so "gotcha" about that.

it's not really a "gotcha" for obama, who is running for nothing but his legacy, which has long been stained by ineffectual foreign policy.

it could be a "gotcha" for hillary clinton, who sang from the same hymn book and who should now have to answer as to her position, if the press will do its job.

it's really more of a "gotcha" for the 9 million syrians who have fled their homeland and cannot return without:


  • being gassed, jailed or tortured by a despot that the west assured them they were committed to helping depose,
  • being beheaded, enslaved or raped by the islamists who gained a foothold when it became obvious that the west was more interested in rhetoric than in assisting moderate rebels, or
  • being blown to bits by clinton's "reset" buddies and assad allies in russia for simply trying to determine their own future.

so yeah, i'd say there's a "gotcha" in there, but nothing as petty as you seem to be implying.

Whoa. Touchy, much? :e2poke: Pull your claws in, Wolverine.

I fail to see anything "petty" in Cramp's post. Maybe I'm just not reading through the lines to find it.
 

William Haskins

poet
Kind Benefactor
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
29,114
Reaction score
8,867
Age
58
Website
www.poisonpen.net
perhaps you should just read the lines as written, then.

i never said there was anything petty in cramp's post.

i said cramp was implying that the OP was a "gotcha" (and thus indicative of a petty motive on my part) and i offered a reasoned rebuttal of why i disagreed.
 

Vince524

Are you gonna finish that bacon?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 8, 2010
Messages
15,903
Reaction score
4,652
Location
In a house
Website
vincentmorrone.com
You don't understand how it works. You have to take one position and stick to it forever regardless of any new factors or information, even if the previous position proved untenable or irresponsible, or just isn't working.

Only weakness and lily-livered liberal delusions make a person change a position over time or try new things. Don't you know that?

No of course someone can change their position. But someone should be able to articulate why.

I once felt this, but after learning and experiencing something, I came to understand that.

Why the change in the Obama stance towards Assad? Did he become less of a monster? Or is it that originally, he never thought Assad would cross that red line and figured he'd never be called on it.
 

nighttimer

No Gods No Masters
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
4,103
Location
CBUS
perhaps you should just read the lines as written, then.

i never said there was anything petty in cramp's post.

i said cramp was implying that the OP was a "gotcha" (and thus indicative of a petty motive on my part) and i offered a reasoned rebuttal of why i disagreed.

Yeah, I know you disagreed with Cramp that the OP was a "gotcha". I did not and do not see anything in the 21 words of Cramp's post which reasonably could be extrapolated to be indicative of a petty motive on your part.

Barring Cramp saying, "Okay, I'll fess up: that was me suggesting Haskins was being petty" or you copping to, "Okay, I'll fess up: it was a "Gotcha!" original post" any and all interpretations are strictly subjective.

Carry on...:e2shrug:
 

raburrell

Treguna Makoidees Trecorum SadisDee
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 24, 2009
Messages
6,902
Reaction score
3,781
Age
50
Location
MA
Website
www.rebeccaburrell.com
Why the change in the Obama stance towards Assad?
One word: Putin.

The statement suggests to me that we've found some limited, perhaps behind-the-scenes way to cooperate with Russia, who after having a plane full of their citizens blown up, suddenly isn't so keen on ISIS either. Assad remains Putin's "red line" however. So, we're stuck with him.

Which, given that the guy has killed at least 10x more people than ISIS so far, really sucks. It's also the reality we're dealing with. I'd probably term it realpolitik more than statesmanship, but... yeah.
 

Vince524

Are you gonna finish that bacon?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 8, 2010
Messages
15,903
Reaction score
4,652
Location
In a house
Website
vincentmorrone.com
Putin has wanted to replace the US as the most powerful country in the world and become the power broker in the Middle East. This suggests that he's succeeding.