goddessofgliese - that's good, having an agent inviting you to submit your next project!! I've had a look at your query (will crit in a bit more detail later), and I doubt very much that one would have ruined your chances with an agent who likes your voice (ie your writing!). What will matter is whether she likes your
concept this time around. And while I do believe the concept could perhaps have been a little bit clearer in your query, it
is there. Don't give up hope yet!
Yes, QLH can be confusing, because there isn't any clear consent about what a good query should look like. Some will look at clarity of concept, grabbing hook etc, others will crit the writing itself – use of active 'strong' verbs, voice etc. And we as writers do have different tastes and opinions on writing etc. so - you will have varying opinions.
It's a good idea to let the crits sit for a while – days, a week – then come back to them and see what resonates with you. Go with that, disregard the rest. Don't try to please every critter. You shouldn't write by committee, whether it's a query or a novel, that will never work.
I agree with ap, it's the pages that really matter, where your writing really needs to shine. Clear, concise description of a great concept in the query, stellar writing in the sample pages, that's what does it, I believe. (Unless you're querying agents who won't see sample pages, that is…then the query needs to do both…)
aceafer - that sounds so encouraging with the 121! Absolutely agree, don't rush your edits. if she's interested in your writing now she'll still be interested a couple of months from now as well. Make it the best you can before sending it out. As for not getting your hopes up, yeah, good look with that! (I would totally - these days, after the two requests for fulls I had at the festival, I'm oscillating wildly between
wow I've totally made it! and
what was I thinking, they're so going to reject me – on the back of a piece of toilet paper!!)
Glad to hear you're doing beetter,
ap! (or should I call you Mrs Fringle, rather?
) And yes I would rather not spend forever querying, sigh… Kind of hope those two fulls now (or one of them) will do it, so I won't have to... Neither realistic nor wise, I know… And yes, synopsises (sp?)
suck! Big time!!!
Congrats with the flash fiction,
Elle! You really have that down, don't you!
Sorry about the rejection
litdawg. Here's your rejection cake, enjoy!
I won't wish for a quiet inbox for you – here's wishing for an inbox overflowing with offers!
Thanks for the hugs,
Patty. Today is one of those days where I really don't believe in anything I've written, ever, how could anyone want to read it, let alone buy it… so good to come here and be among friends. Here's a hug to you as well, and good luck with your project, whether it will be through trade or self pub. You'll make it, I'm sure.
Sorry about your comp,
pingle That's so frustrating when the tech doesn't work. I
hate it when I have to change my writing habits, hampers so much! Hope your little one is doing better also, and you're not coming down with anything serious! I can't give you any advice on genre – ancient Rome does sound like historical to me, but? Does it have any fantasy elements? I read on
Kristin Nelson's blog that Ancient Rome is one of the twelve things she sees the most in her slush pile. She's American of course, so don't know if the same is true for Brit agents. But it does sound as if the competition is stiff there – you really need to stand out. If you write Rome with fantasy elements, maybe that will do it? Make it different enough?