Why? If you're passionate about the story and treat your readers with the respect they deserve, research is simply another aspect of writing, and often fun.. . I never felt like it was work becasue it was all to ensure the story had verisimilitude.
Well, I don't think I'm disrespectful of readers, just that my readers will be different than yours. Please note the tense. I haven't published anything. I was referring to scientific research, most notably the list that starts with
Quantum mechanics and continues through
Cherenkov radiation, when I said it made my head ache. Oww.
Anyway, I don't write sci-fi; I write fantasy, and my research is very different. Still, I think of it as work, because it's the writing of the story that I love to do. I am, however, suitably impressed by your diligence and envious of the obvious pleasure you derive from studying such complicated sciences.
I hope the sequel is coming along. I'm impressed that you're writing battles and Saxons and so on--HF? I've gotten into some organizational stuff lately too, reducing each chapter to a notecard so I can lay them out and sort of get a vision of the whole book. I'm not a fitter-inner either but maybe a lot of us are oddballs on this thread, eh?
From one oddball to another: Sequel is finally moving into a scene I am anxious to write. A battle, yes, but the book is not about
a or
the war with the Saxons. This is more personal. Fantasy, set in a 5th Century Britain in which a swathe of land - that has never existed in this world - runs through its belly, home to a group of monsters - or are they, really? Previous book is in the hands of editor who likes my work.
Notecards. Always knew that was a good idea. I am such a sloppy organizer. I dash notes out in information managers and word processors and then never know where I put them, and I keep EVERYTHING - somewhere.
Note cards. Such a good idea.
BTW. The writing keeps me sane. Don't know how I'd live without it.