- Joined
- Nov 10, 2009
- Messages
- 10,361
- Reaction score
- 1,032
- Location
- In your mind
- Website
- maxoneverything.wordpress.com
In a way this is a remarkable statement by anyone involved in political commentary. The essence of what Ann Coulter is saying here is that nobody has civil rights, except for the ones that government has acted in a systemic way against.
http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/us-pundit-says-civil-rights-are-‘blacks-not-gays’240912
So, in Ms Coulter's views, the only people that have civil rights are black people, because of the history of apartheid and slavery. Nobody else has civil rights. Not women, not hispanics, not LGBT. Note that she did not include rich white people in that list.
The thing is that Ms Coulter has a law degree from University of Michigan and a BA from Cornell. I've never thought Ms Coulter to be stupid - arrogant, pompous, rude, and elitist yes but not stupid. So what gives with her saying this?
http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/us-pundit-says-civil-rights-are-‘blacks-not-gays’240912
In an interview with This Week host George Stephanopoulos, she said: ‘Various groups [including] gay rights groups, those defending immigrants, and feminists have commandeered the black civil rights experience.’
Coulter said she thinks ‘civil rights are for blacks’ because the United States has a ‘legacy of slavery and Jim Crow laws.’
So, in Ms Coulter's views, the only people that have civil rights are black people, because of the history of apartheid and slavery. Nobody else has civil rights. Not women, not hispanics, not LGBT. Note that she did not include rich white people in that list.
The thing is that Ms Coulter has a law degree from University of Michigan and a BA from Cornell. I've never thought Ms Coulter to be stupid - arrogant, pompous, rude, and elitist yes but not stupid. So what gives with her saying this?