- Joined
- Jul 8, 2012
- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 0
I read an article recently that lamented the fact Amanda Hocking has sold so many different titles against Lee's one spectacular success. The author made their disdain of Hocking's writing ability clear, saying it didn't compare to the way Lee crafted her work.
It got me thinking which one I'd rather be. Hocking with lots of titles and a seeming ability to keep creating new work or Lee with sales of about 20 million at the last count.
To me writing is about story telling; exciting and involving people in the problems and exploits of your characters. Taking people into a whole new world of adventure.
I pay a great editor to not only correct my grammar but also to check the plot, look at things from the reader's view, and spot the things that I'm too involved to see. I don't want to win the Pullitzer but I make sure my work's well presented.
I get the impression that Lee isn't entirely comfortable with her legacy and maybe a second or third book, even if not so well received, would have given her more contentment.
Who would you rather be?
It got me thinking which one I'd rather be. Hocking with lots of titles and a seeming ability to keep creating new work or Lee with sales of about 20 million at the last count.
To me writing is about story telling; exciting and involving people in the problems and exploits of your characters. Taking people into a whole new world of adventure.
I pay a great editor to not only correct my grammar but also to check the plot, look at things from the reader's view, and spot the things that I'm too involved to see. I don't want to win the Pullitzer but I make sure my work's well presented.
I get the impression that Lee isn't entirely comfortable with her legacy and maybe a second or third book, even if not so well received, would have given her more contentment.
Who would you rather be?